Cargando…

Cognitive practice effects delay diagnosis of MCI: Implications for clinical trials

INTRODUCTION: Practice effects (PEs) on cognitive tests obscure decline, thereby delaying detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Importantly, PEs may be present even when there are performance declines, if scores would have been even lower without prior test exposure. We assessed how accounti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanderson‐Cimino, Mark, Elman, Jeremy A., Tu, Xin M., Gross, Alden L., Panizzon, Matthew S., Gustavson, Daniel E., Bondi, Mark W., Edmonds, Emily C., Eglit, Graham M.L., Eppig, Joel S., Franz, Carol E., Jak, Amy J., Lyons, Michael J., Thomas, Kelsey R., Williams, McKenna E., Kremen, William S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8804942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12228
_version_ 1784643153227153408
author Sanderson‐Cimino, Mark
Elman, Jeremy A.
Tu, Xin M.
Gross, Alden L.
Panizzon, Matthew S.
Gustavson, Daniel E.
Bondi, Mark W.
Edmonds, Emily C.
Eglit, Graham M.L.
Eppig, Joel S.
Franz, Carol E.
Jak, Amy J.
Lyons, Michael J.
Thomas, Kelsey R.
Williams, McKenna E.
Kremen, William S.
author_facet Sanderson‐Cimino, Mark
Elman, Jeremy A.
Tu, Xin M.
Gross, Alden L.
Panizzon, Matthew S.
Gustavson, Daniel E.
Bondi, Mark W.
Edmonds, Emily C.
Eglit, Graham M.L.
Eppig, Joel S.
Franz, Carol E.
Jak, Amy J.
Lyons, Michael J.
Thomas, Kelsey R.
Williams, McKenna E.
Kremen, William S.
author_sort Sanderson‐Cimino, Mark
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Practice effects (PEs) on cognitive tests obscure decline, thereby delaying detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Importantly, PEs may be present even when there are performance declines, if scores would have been even lower without prior test exposure. We assessed how accounting for PEs using a replacement‐participants method impacts incident MCI diagnosis. METHODS: Of 889 baseline cognitively normal (CN) Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants, 722 returned 1 year later (mean age = 74.9 ± 6.8 at baseline). The scores of test‐naïve demographically matched “replacement” participants who took tests for the first time were compared to returnee scores at follow‐up. PEs—calculated as the difference between returnee follow‐up scores and replacement participants scores—were subtracted from follow‐up scores of returnees. PE‐adjusted cognitive scores were then used to determine if individuals were below the impairment threshold for MCI. Cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta, phosphorylated tau, and total tau were used for criterion validation. In addition, based on screening and recruitment numbers from a clinical trial of amyloid‐positive individuals, we estimated the effect of earlier detection of MCI by accounting for cognitive PEs on a hypothetical clinical trial in which the key outcome was progression to MCI. RESULTS: In the ADNI sample, PE‐adjusted scores increased MCI incidence by 19% (P < .001), increased proportion of amyloid‐positive MCI cases (+12%), and reduced proportion of amyloid‐positive CNs (–5%; P’s < .04). Additional calculations showed that the earlier detection and increased MCI incidence would also substantially reduce necessary sample size and study duration for a clinical trial of progression to MCI. Cost savings were estimated at ≈$5.41 million. DISCUSSION: Detecting MCI as early as possible is of obvious importance. Accounting for cognitive PEs with the replacement‐participants method leads to earlier detection of MCI, improved diagnostic accuracy, and can lead to multi‐million‐dollar cost reductions for clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8804942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88049422022-02-04 Cognitive practice effects delay diagnosis of MCI: Implications for clinical trials Sanderson‐Cimino, Mark Elman, Jeremy A. Tu, Xin M. Gross, Alden L. Panizzon, Matthew S. Gustavson, Daniel E. Bondi, Mark W. Edmonds, Emily C. Eglit, Graham M.L. Eppig, Joel S. Franz, Carol E. Jak, Amy J. Lyons, Michael J. Thomas, Kelsey R. Williams, McKenna E. Kremen, William S. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Research Articles INTRODUCTION: Practice effects (PEs) on cognitive tests obscure decline, thereby delaying detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Importantly, PEs may be present even when there are performance declines, if scores would have been even lower without prior test exposure. We assessed how accounting for PEs using a replacement‐participants method impacts incident MCI diagnosis. METHODS: Of 889 baseline cognitively normal (CN) Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants, 722 returned 1 year later (mean age = 74.9 ± 6.8 at baseline). The scores of test‐naïve demographically matched “replacement” participants who took tests for the first time were compared to returnee scores at follow‐up. PEs—calculated as the difference between returnee follow‐up scores and replacement participants scores—were subtracted from follow‐up scores of returnees. PE‐adjusted cognitive scores were then used to determine if individuals were below the impairment threshold for MCI. Cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta, phosphorylated tau, and total tau were used for criterion validation. In addition, based on screening and recruitment numbers from a clinical trial of amyloid‐positive individuals, we estimated the effect of earlier detection of MCI by accounting for cognitive PEs on a hypothetical clinical trial in which the key outcome was progression to MCI. RESULTS: In the ADNI sample, PE‐adjusted scores increased MCI incidence by 19% (P < .001), increased proportion of amyloid‐positive MCI cases (+12%), and reduced proportion of amyloid‐positive CNs (–5%; P’s < .04). Additional calculations showed that the earlier detection and increased MCI incidence would also substantially reduce necessary sample size and study duration for a clinical trial of progression to MCI. Cost savings were estimated at ≈$5.41 million. DISCUSSION: Detecting MCI as early as possible is of obvious importance. Accounting for cognitive PEs with the replacement‐participants method leads to earlier detection of MCI, improved diagnostic accuracy, and can lead to multi‐million‐dollar cost reductions for clinical trials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8804942/ /pubmed/35128027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12228 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Sanderson‐Cimino, Mark
Elman, Jeremy A.
Tu, Xin M.
Gross, Alden L.
Panizzon, Matthew S.
Gustavson, Daniel E.
Bondi, Mark W.
Edmonds, Emily C.
Eglit, Graham M.L.
Eppig, Joel S.
Franz, Carol E.
Jak, Amy J.
Lyons, Michael J.
Thomas, Kelsey R.
Williams, McKenna E.
Kremen, William S.
Cognitive practice effects delay diagnosis of MCI: Implications for clinical trials
title Cognitive practice effects delay diagnosis of MCI: Implications for clinical trials
title_full Cognitive practice effects delay diagnosis of MCI: Implications for clinical trials
title_fullStr Cognitive practice effects delay diagnosis of MCI: Implications for clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive practice effects delay diagnosis of MCI: Implications for clinical trials
title_short Cognitive practice effects delay diagnosis of MCI: Implications for clinical trials
title_sort cognitive practice effects delay diagnosis of mci: implications for clinical trials
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8804942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12228
work_keys_str_mv AT sandersonciminomark cognitivepracticeeffectsdelaydiagnosisofmciimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT elmanjeremya cognitivepracticeeffectsdelaydiagnosisofmciimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT tuxinm cognitivepracticeeffectsdelaydiagnosisofmciimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT grossaldenl cognitivepracticeeffectsdelaydiagnosisofmciimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT panizzonmatthews cognitivepracticeeffectsdelaydiagnosisofmciimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT gustavsondaniele cognitivepracticeeffectsdelaydiagnosisofmciimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT bondimarkw cognitivepracticeeffectsdelaydiagnosisofmciimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT edmondsemilyc cognitivepracticeeffectsdelaydiagnosisofmciimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT eglitgrahamml cognitivepracticeeffectsdelaydiagnosisofmciimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT eppigjoels cognitivepracticeeffectsdelaydiagnosisofmciimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT franzcarole cognitivepracticeeffectsdelaydiagnosisofmciimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT jakamyj cognitivepracticeeffectsdelaydiagnosisofmciimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT lyonsmichaelj cognitivepracticeeffectsdelaydiagnosisofmciimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT thomaskelseyr cognitivepracticeeffectsdelaydiagnosisofmciimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT williamsmckennae cognitivepracticeeffectsdelaydiagnosisofmciimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT kremenwilliams cognitivepracticeeffectsdelaydiagnosisofmciimplicationsforclinicaltrials
AT cognitivepracticeeffectsdelaydiagnosisofmciimplicationsforclinicaltrials