Cargando…

Musculoskeletal Imaging for Low Back Pain in Direct Access Physical Therapy Compared to Primary Care: An Observational Study

BACKGROUND: Overutilization of diagnostic imaging is associated with poor outcomes and increased costs. Physical therapists demonstrate the ability to order diagnostic imaging safely and appropriately, and early access to physical therapy reduces unnecessary imaging, lowers healthcare costs, and imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crowell, Michael S, Mason, John S, McGinniss, John H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: NASMI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8805092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35136693
http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.31720
_version_ 1784643171990372352
author Crowell, Michael S
Mason, John S
McGinniss, John H
author_facet Crowell, Michael S
Mason, John S
McGinniss, John H
author_sort Crowell, Michael S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Overutilization of diagnostic imaging is associated with poor outcomes and increased costs. Physical therapists demonstrate the ability to order diagnostic imaging safely and appropriately, and early access to physical therapy reduces unnecessary imaging, lowers healthcare costs, and improves outcomes. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to compare rates of compliance with the National Committee for Quality Assurance – Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) recommendations for diagnostic imaging in low back pain between physical therapists and primary care providers in young, athletic patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Military Health System Data Repository (MDR) data from January 2019 to May 2020 was reviewed for compliance with the low back pain HEDIS recommendation. The low back pain imaging HEDIS measure identifies the percentage of patients who did not have an imaging study (plain X-ray, MRI, CT Scan) ordered on the first encounter with a diagnosis of low back pain or in the 28 days following that first diagnosis. Chi-square tests compared HEDIS compliance rates, with α = 0.05 set a priori. RESULTS: From January 2019 to May 2020, in patients age 18-24, the MDR database identified 1,845 total visits for LBP identified in the Physical Therapy Clinic and 467 total visits for LBP in the Primary Care Clinic. In the Physical Therapy Clinic, 96.7% of encounters did not have imaging ordered within the first 28 days of onset of symptoms, compared with 82.0% in the Primary Care Clinic (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing data from a national standardized healthcare performance measure, physical therapists practicing in a direct-access setting were significantly more likely than primary care providers to adhere to guidelines for low back pain imaging in young, athletic patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8805092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher NASMI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88050922022-02-07 Musculoskeletal Imaging for Low Back Pain in Direct Access Physical Therapy Compared to Primary Care: An Observational Study Crowell, Michael S Mason, John S McGinniss, John H Int J Sports Phys Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: Overutilization of diagnostic imaging is associated with poor outcomes and increased costs. Physical therapists demonstrate the ability to order diagnostic imaging safely and appropriately, and early access to physical therapy reduces unnecessary imaging, lowers healthcare costs, and improves outcomes. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to compare rates of compliance with the National Committee for Quality Assurance – Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) recommendations for diagnostic imaging in low back pain between physical therapists and primary care providers in young, athletic patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Military Health System Data Repository (MDR) data from January 2019 to May 2020 was reviewed for compliance with the low back pain HEDIS recommendation. The low back pain imaging HEDIS measure identifies the percentage of patients who did not have an imaging study (plain X-ray, MRI, CT Scan) ordered on the first encounter with a diagnosis of low back pain or in the 28 days following that first diagnosis. Chi-square tests compared HEDIS compliance rates, with α = 0.05 set a priori. RESULTS: From January 2019 to May 2020, in patients age 18-24, the MDR database identified 1,845 total visits for LBP identified in the Physical Therapy Clinic and 467 total visits for LBP in the Primary Care Clinic. In the Physical Therapy Clinic, 96.7% of encounters did not have imaging ordered within the first 28 days of onset of symptoms, compared with 82.0% in the Primary Care Clinic (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing data from a national standardized healthcare performance measure, physical therapists practicing in a direct-access setting were significantly more likely than primary care providers to adhere to guidelines for low back pain imaging in young, athletic patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. NASMI 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8805092/ /pubmed/35136693 http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.31720 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Crowell, Michael S
Mason, John S
McGinniss, John H
Musculoskeletal Imaging for Low Back Pain in Direct Access Physical Therapy Compared to Primary Care: An Observational Study
title Musculoskeletal Imaging for Low Back Pain in Direct Access Physical Therapy Compared to Primary Care: An Observational Study
title_full Musculoskeletal Imaging for Low Back Pain in Direct Access Physical Therapy Compared to Primary Care: An Observational Study
title_fullStr Musculoskeletal Imaging for Low Back Pain in Direct Access Physical Therapy Compared to Primary Care: An Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Musculoskeletal Imaging for Low Back Pain in Direct Access Physical Therapy Compared to Primary Care: An Observational Study
title_short Musculoskeletal Imaging for Low Back Pain in Direct Access Physical Therapy Compared to Primary Care: An Observational Study
title_sort musculoskeletal imaging for low back pain in direct access physical therapy compared to primary care: an observational study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8805092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35136693
http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.31720
work_keys_str_mv AT crowellmichaels musculoskeletalimagingforlowbackpainindirectaccessphysicaltherapycomparedtoprimarycareanobservationalstudy
AT masonjohns musculoskeletalimagingforlowbackpainindirectaccessphysicaltherapycomparedtoprimarycareanobservationalstudy
AT mcginnissjohnh musculoskeletalimagingforlowbackpainindirectaccessphysicaltherapycomparedtoprimarycareanobservationalstudy