Cargando…

Evaluation of Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Three Concentrations of Ropivacaine

Background: Ultrasound-guided rhombic intercostal block (RIB) is a novel regional block that provides analgesia for patients who have received video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The anesthetic characteristics of ultrasound-guided RIB with different concentrations of ropivacaine are not kno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Wei, Jiang, Chen-Wei, Qian, Ke-jian, Liu, Fen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8805173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35115929
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.774859
_version_ 1784643189268807680
author Deng, Wei
Jiang, Chen-Wei
Qian, Ke-jian
Liu, Fen
author_facet Deng, Wei
Jiang, Chen-Wei
Qian, Ke-jian
Liu, Fen
author_sort Deng, Wei
collection PubMed
description Background: Ultrasound-guided rhombic intercostal block (RIB) is a novel regional block that provides analgesia for patients who have received video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The anesthetic characteristics of ultrasound-guided RIB with different concentrations of ropivacaine are not known. This research primarily hypothesizes that ultrasound-guided RIB, given in combination with the same volume of different concentrations of ropivacaine, would improve the whole quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) among patients with VATS. Approaches: This double-blinded, single-center, prospective, and controlled trial randomized 100 patients undergoing VATS to receive RIB. One hundred patients who have received elective VATS and satisfied inclusion standards were fallen into four groups randomly: control group with no RIB and R(0.2%), R(0.3%), and R(0.4%); they underwent common anesthesia plus the RIB with ropivacaine at 0.2%, 0.3%, and 0.4% in a volume of 30 ml. Outcomes: Groups R(0.2%), R(0.3%), and R(0.4%) displayed great diversities in the overall QoR-40 scores and QoR-40 dimensions (in addition to psychological support) by comparing with the control group (Group C) (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). Groups R(0.3%) and R(0.4%) displayed great diversities in the overall QoR-40 scores and QoR-40 dimensions (in addition to psychological support) by comparing with the R(0.2%) group (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). The overall QoR-40 scores and QoR-40 dimensions [physical comfort (p = 0.585)] did not vary greatly between Groups R(0.3%) and R(0.4%) (p > 0.05 for all contrasts). Groups R(0.2%), R(0.3%), and R(0.4%) showed significant differences in numerical rating scales (NRS) score region under the curve (AUC) at rest and on movement in 48 h when compared with the Group C (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). Groups R(0.3%) and R(0.4%) displayed great diversities in NRS score AUC at rest and on movement in 48 h when compared with the R(0.2%) group (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). The NRS mark AUC at rest and, on movement in 48 h, did not vary greatly between the Group R(0.3%) and R(0.4%) (p > 0.05 for all contrasts). Conclusion: In this study it was found that a dose of 0.3% ropivacaine is the best concentration for RIB for patients undergoing VATS. Through growing ropivacaine concentration, the analgesia of the RIB was not improved greatly. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier ChiCTR2100046254.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8805173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88051732022-02-02 Evaluation of Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Three Concentrations of Ropivacaine Deng, Wei Jiang, Chen-Wei Qian, Ke-jian Liu, Fen Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Ultrasound-guided rhombic intercostal block (RIB) is a novel regional block that provides analgesia for patients who have received video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The anesthetic characteristics of ultrasound-guided RIB with different concentrations of ropivacaine are not known. This research primarily hypothesizes that ultrasound-guided RIB, given in combination with the same volume of different concentrations of ropivacaine, would improve the whole quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) among patients with VATS. Approaches: This double-blinded, single-center, prospective, and controlled trial randomized 100 patients undergoing VATS to receive RIB. One hundred patients who have received elective VATS and satisfied inclusion standards were fallen into four groups randomly: control group with no RIB and R(0.2%), R(0.3%), and R(0.4%); they underwent common anesthesia plus the RIB with ropivacaine at 0.2%, 0.3%, and 0.4% in a volume of 30 ml. Outcomes: Groups R(0.2%), R(0.3%), and R(0.4%) displayed great diversities in the overall QoR-40 scores and QoR-40 dimensions (in addition to psychological support) by comparing with the control group (Group C) (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). Groups R(0.3%) and R(0.4%) displayed great diversities in the overall QoR-40 scores and QoR-40 dimensions (in addition to psychological support) by comparing with the R(0.2%) group (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). The overall QoR-40 scores and QoR-40 dimensions [physical comfort (p = 0.585)] did not vary greatly between Groups R(0.3%) and R(0.4%) (p > 0.05 for all contrasts). Groups R(0.2%), R(0.3%), and R(0.4%) showed significant differences in numerical rating scales (NRS) score region under the curve (AUC) at rest and on movement in 48 h when compared with the Group C (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). Groups R(0.3%) and R(0.4%) displayed great diversities in NRS score AUC at rest and on movement in 48 h when compared with the R(0.2%) group (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). The NRS mark AUC at rest and, on movement in 48 h, did not vary greatly between the Group R(0.3%) and R(0.4%) (p > 0.05 for all contrasts). Conclusion: In this study it was found that a dose of 0.3% ropivacaine is the best concentration for RIB for patients undergoing VATS. Through growing ropivacaine concentration, the analgesia of the RIB was not improved greatly. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier ChiCTR2100046254. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8805173/ /pubmed/35115929 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.774859 Text en Copyright © 2022 Deng, Jiang, Qian and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Deng, Wei
Jiang, Chen-Wei
Qian, Ke-jian
Liu, Fen
Evaluation of Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Three Concentrations of Ropivacaine
title Evaluation of Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Three Concentrations of Ropivacaine
title_full Evaluation of Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Three Concentrations of Ropivacaine
title_fullStr Evaluation of Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Three Concentrations of Ropivacaine
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Three Concentrations of Ropivacaine
title_short Evaluation of Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Three Concentrations of Ropivacaine
title_sort evaluation of rhomboid intercostal block in video-assisted thoracic surgery: comparing three concentrations of ropivacaine
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8805173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35115929
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.774859
work_keys_str_mv AT dengwei evaluationofrhomboidintercostalblockinvideoassistedthoracicsurgerycomparingthreeconcentrationsofropivacaine
AT jiangchenwei evaluationofrhomboidintercostalblockinvideoassistedthoracicsurgerycomparingthreeconcentrationsofropivacaine
AT qiankejian evaluationofrhomboidintercostalblockinvideoassistedthoracicsurgerycomparingthreeconcentrationsofropivacaine
AT liufen evaluationofrhomboidintercostalblockinvideoassistedthoracicsurgerycomparingthreeconcentrationsofropivacaine