Cargando…
Evaluation of Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Three Concentrations of Ropivacaine
Background: Ultrasound-guided rhombic intercostal block (RIB) is a novel regional block that provides analgesia for patients who have received video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The anesthetic characteristics of ultrasound-guided RIB with different concentrations of ropivacaine are not kno...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8805173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35115929 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.774859 |
_version_ | 1784643189268807680 |
---|---|
author | Deng, Wei Jiang, Chen-Wei Qian, Ke-jian Liu, Fen |
author_facet | Deng, Wei Jiang, Chen-Wei Qian, Ke-jian Liu, Fen |
author_sort | Deng, Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Ultrasound-guided rhombic intercostal block (RIB) is a novel regional block that provides analgesia for patients who have received video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The anesthetic characteristics of ultrasound-guided RIB with different concentrations of ropivacaine are not known. This research primarily hypothesizes that ultrasound-guided RIB, given in combination with the same volume of different concentrations of ropivacaine, would improve the whole quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) among patients with VATS. Approaches: This double-blinded, single-center, prospective, and controlled trial randomized 100 patients undergoing VATS to receive RIB. One hundred patients who have received elective VATS and satisfied inclusion standards were fallen into four groups randomly: control group with no RIB and R(0.2%), R(0.3%), and R(0.4%); they underwent common anesthesia plus the RIB with ropivacaine at 0.2%, 0.3%, and 0.4% in a volume of 30 ml. Outcomes: Groups R(0.2%), R(0.3%), and R(0.4%) displayed great diversities in the overall QoR-40 scores and QoR-40 dimensions (in addition to psychological support) by comparing with the control group (Group C) (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). Groups R(0.3%) and R(0.4%) displayed great diversities in the overall QoR-40 scores and QoR-40 dimensions (in addition to psychological support) by comparing with the R(0.2%) group (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). The overall QoR-40 scores and QoR-40 dimensions [physical comfort (p = 0.585)] did not vary greatly between Groups R(0.3%) and R(0.4%) (p > 0.05 for all contrasts). Groups R(0.2%), R(0.3%), and R(0.4%) showed significant differences in numerical rating scales (NRS) score region under the curve (AUC) at rest and on movement in 48 h when compared with the Group C (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). Groups R(0.3%) and R(0.4%) displayed great diversities in NRS score AUC at rest and on movement in 48 h when compared with the R(0.2%) group (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). The NRS mark AUC at rest and, on movement in 48 h, did not vary greatly between the Group R(0.3%) and R(0.4%) (p > 0.05 for all contrasts). Conclusion: In this study it was found that a dose of 0.3% ropivacaine is the best concentration for RIB for patients undergoing VATS. Through growing ropivacaine concentration, the analgesia of the RIB was not improved greatly. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier ChiCTR2100046254. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8805173 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88051732022-02-02 Evaluation of Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Three Concentrations of Ropivacaine Deng, Wei Jiang, Chen-Wei Qian, Ke-jian Liu, Fen Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Ultrasound-guided rhombic intercostal block (RIB) is a novel regional block that provides analgesia for patients who have received video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The anesthetic characteristics of ultrasound-guided RIB with different concentrations of ropivacaine are not known. This research primarily hypothesizes that ultrasound-guided RIB, given in combination with the same volume of different concentrations of ropivacaine, would improve the whole quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) among patients with VATS. Approaches: This double-blinded, single-center, prospective, and controlled trial randomized 100 patients undergoing VATS to receive RIB. One hundred patients who have received elective VATS and satisfied inclusion standards were fallen into four groups randomly: control group with no RIB and R(0.2%), R(0.3%), and R(0.4%); they underwent common anesthesia plus the RIB with ropivacaine at 0.2%, 0.3%, and 0.4% in a volume of 30 ml. Outcomes: Groups R(0.2%), R(0.3%), and R(0.4%) displayed great diversities in the overall QoR-40 scores and QoR-40 dimensions (in addition to psychological support) by comparing with the control group (Group C) (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). Groups R(0.3%) and R(0.4%) displayed great diversities in the overall QoR-40 scores and QoR-40 dimensions (in addition to psychological support) by comparing with the R(0.2%) group (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). The overall QoR-40 scores and QoR-40 dimensions [physical comfort (p = 0.585)] did not vary greatly between Groups R(0.3%) and R(0.4%) (p > 0.05 for all contrasts). Groups R(0.2%), R(0.3%), and R(0.4%) showed significant differences in numerical rating scales (NRS) score region under the curve (AUC) at rest and on movement in 48 h when compared with the Group C (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). Groups R(0.3%) and R(0.4%) displayed great diversities in NRS score AUC at rest and on movement in 48 h when compared with the R(0.2%) group (p < 0.001 for all contrasts). The NRS mark AUC at rest and, on movement in 48 h, did not vary greatly between the Group R(0.3%) and R(0.4%) (p > 0.05 for all contrasts). Conclusion: In this study it was found that a dose of 0.3% ropivacaine is the best concentration for RIB for patients undergoing VATS. Through growing ropivacaine concentration, the analgesia of the RIB was not improved greatly. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier ChiCTR2100046254. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8805173/ /pubmed/35115929 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.774859 Text en Copyright © 2022 Deng, Jiang, Qian and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Deng, Wei Jiang, Chen-Wei Qian, Ke-jian Liu, Fen Evaluation of Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Three Concentrations of Ropivacaine |
title | Evaluation of Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Three Concentrations of Ropivacaine |
title_full | Evaluation of Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Three Concentrations of Ropivacaine |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Three Concentrations of Ropivacaine |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Three Concentrations of Ropivacaine |
title_short | Evaluation of Rhomboid Intercostal Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Comparing Three Concentrations of Ropivacaine |
title_sort | evaluation of rhomboid intercostal block in video-assisted thoracic surgery: comparing three concentrations of ropivacaine |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8805173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35115929 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.774859 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dengwei evaluationofrhomboidintercostalblockinvideoassistedthoracicsurgerycomparingthreeconcentrationsofropivacaine AT jiangchenwei evaluationofrhomboidintercostalblockinvideoassistedthoracicsurgerycomparingthreeconcentrationsofropivacaine AT qiankejian evaluationofrhomboidintercostalblockinvideoassistedthoracicsurgerycomparingthreeconcentrationsofropivacaine AT liufen evaluationofrhomboidintercostalblockinvideoassistedthoracicsurgerycomparingthreeconcentrationsofropivacaine |