Cargando…
Barriers and facilitators of following perioperative internal medicine recommendations by surgical teams: a sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study
BACKGROUND: Preoperative medical consultations add expense and burden for patients and the impact of these consults on patient outcomes is conflicting. Previous work suggests that 10–40% of preoperative medical consult recommendations are not followed. This limits measurement of the effect of periop...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8805252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35101113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-021-00236-x |
_version_ | 1784643205370740736 |
---|---|
author | Flemons, Kristin Bosch, Michael Coakeley, Sarah Muzammal, Bushra Kachra, Rahim Ruzycki, Shannon M. |
author_facet | Flemons, Kristin Bosch, Michael Coakeley, Sarah Muzammal, Bushra Kachra, Rahim Ruzycki, Shannon M. |
author_sort | Flemons, Kristin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Preoperative medical consultations add expense and burden for patients and the impact of these consults on patient outcomes is conflicting. Previous work suggests that 10–40% of preoperative medical consult recommendations are not followed. This limits measurement of the effect of perioperative medical consultation on patient outcomes and represents a quality gap, given the patient time and healthcare cost associated with consultation. We aimed to measure, characterize, and understand reasons for missed recommendations from preoperative medical consultation. METHODS: This explanatory, sequential mixed-methods study used chart audits followed by semi-structured interviews. Chart audit of consecutive patients seen in preoperative medical clinic were reviewed to measure the proportion and characterize the type of recommendations that were not completed (“missed”). This phase informed the interview participants and questions. The interview guide was developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Template analysis was used to understand drivers and barriers of missed recommendations RESULTS: Chart audit included 255 patients (n=161, 63.1% female) seen in preadmission clinic between April 1 and April 30, 2019. 55.7% of patients had all recommendations followed (n=142). Postoperative anticoagulation management and postoperative cardiac biomarker surveillance recommendations were least commonly followed (50.0%, n=28, and 68.9%, n=82, respectively). Eighteen surgical team members were interviewed. Missed recommendations were both unintentional and intentional, and the key drivers differed by these categories. Unintentionally missed recommendations occurred due to individual-level factors (drivers: knowledge of the consultation note, lack of routine for reviewing the consultation note, and competing demands on time) and systems-level factors (driver: lack of role clarity). Intentionally missed recommendations occurred due to user error due (drivers: lack of knowledge of guidelines or evidence) and appropriate modifications (driver: need to adapt a preoperative plan for a complicated postoperative course). CONCLUSIONS: Only 55.7% of consult notes had all recommendations followed, suggesting a quality gap in perioperative medical care. Qualitative data suggests multiple drivers of missed recommendations that should be targeted to improve the efficiency of care for these patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13741-021-00236-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8805252 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88052522022-02-03 Barriers and facilitators of following perioperative internal medicine recommendations by surgical teams: a sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study Flemons, Kristin Bosch, Michael Coakeley, Sarah Muzammal, Bushra Kachra, Rahim Ruzycki, Shannon M. Perioper Med (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Preoperative medical consultations add expense and burden for patients and the impact of these consults on patient outcomes is conflicting. Previous work suggests that 10–40% of preoperative medical consult recommendations are not followed. This limits measurement of the effect of perioperative medical consultation on patient outcomes and represents a quality gap, given the patient time and healthcare cost associated with consultation. We aimed to measure, characterize, and understand reasons for missed recommendations from preoperative medical consultation. METHODS: This explanatory, sequential mixed-methods study used chart audits followed by semi-structured interviews. Chart audit of consecutive patients seen in preoperative medical clinic were reviewed to measure the proportion and characterize the type of recommendations that were not completed (“missed”). This phase informed the interview participants and questions. The interview guide was developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Template analysis was used to understand drivers and barriers of missed recommendations RESULTS: Chart audit included 255 patients (n=161, 63.1% female) seen in preadmission clinic between April 1 and April 30, 2019. 55.7% of patients had all recommendations followed (n=142). Postoperative anticoagulation management and postoperative cardiac biomarker surveillance recommendations were least commonly followed (50.0%, n=28, and 68.9%, n=82, respectively). Eighteen surgical team members were interviewed. Missed recommendations were both unintentional and intentional, and the key drivers differed by these categories. Unintentionally missed recommendations occurred due to individual-level factors (drivers: knowledge of the consultation note, lack of routine for reviewing the consultation note, and competing demands on time) and systems-level factors (driver: lack of role clarity). Intentionally missed recommendations occurred due to user error due (drivers: lack of knowledge of guidelines or evidence) and appropriate modifications (driver: need to adapt a preoperative plan for a complicated postoperative course). CONCLUSIONS: Only 55.7% of consult notes had all recommendations followed, suggesting a quality gap in perioperative medical care. Qualitative data suggests multiple drivers of missed recommendations that should be targeted to improve the efficiency of care for these patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13741-021-00236-x. BioMed Central 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8805252/ /pubmed/35101113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-021-00236-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Flemons, Kristin Bosch, Michael Coakeley, Sarah Muzammal, Bushra Kachra, Rahim Ruzycki, Shannon M. Barriers and facilitators of following perioperative internal medicine recommendations by surgical teams: a sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study |
title | Barriers and facilitators of following perioperative internal medicine recommendations by surgical teams: a sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study |
title_full | Barriers and facilitators of following perioperative internal medicine recommendations by surgical teams: a sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study |
title_fullStr | Barriers and facilitators of following perioperative internal medicine recommendations by surgical teams: a sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Barriers and facilitators of following perioperative internal medicine recommendations by surgical teams: a sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study |
title_short | Barriers and facilitators of following perioperative internal medicine recommendations by surgical teams: a sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study |
title_sort | barriers and facilitators of following perioperative internal medicine recommendations by surgical teams: a sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8805252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35101113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-021-00236-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flemonskristin barriersandfacilitatorsoffollowingperioperativeinternalmedicinerecommendationsbysurgicalteamsasequentialexplanatorymixedmethodsstudy AT boschmichael barriersandfacilitatorsoffollowingperioperativeinternalmedicinerecommendationsbysurgicalteamsasequentialexplanatorymixedmethodsstudy AT coakeleysarah barriersandfacilitatorsoffollowingperioperativeinternalmedicinerecommendationsbysurgicalteamsasequentialexplanatorymixedmethodsstudy AT muzammalbushra barriersandfacilitatorsoffollowingperioperativeinternalmedicinerecommendationsbysurgicalteamsasequentialexplanatorymixedmethodsstudy AT kachrarahim barriersandfacilitatorsoffollowingperioperativeinternalmedicinerecommendationsbysurgicalteamsasequentialexplanatorymixedmethodsstudy AT ruzyckishannonm barriersandfacilitatorsoffollowingperioperativeinternalmedicinerecommendationsbysurgicalteamsasequentialexplanatorymixedmethodsstudy |