Cargando…

Variable levels of spike and ORF1ab RNA in post-mortem lung samples of SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects: comparison between ISH and RT-PCR

Post-mortem examination plays a pivotal role in understanding the pathobiology of the SARS-CoV-2; thus, the optimization of virus detection on the post-mortem formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is needed. Different techniques are available for the identification of the SARS-CoV-2, includ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zito Marino, Federica, De Cristofaro, Tiziana, Varriale, Massimo, Zannini, Giuseppa, Ronchi, Andrea, La Mantia, Elvira, Campobasso, Carlo Pietro, De Micco, Francesco, Mascolo, Pasquale, Municinò, Maurizio, Municinò, Emilia, Vestini, Francesco, Pinto, Omero, Moccia, Marta, De Stefano, Noè, Nappi, Oscar, Sementa, Carmen, Zotti, Giovanni, Pianese, Lamberto, Giordano, Carmela, Franco, Renato
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8805427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35103846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03262-8
_version_ 1784643249810440192
author Zito Marino, Federica
De Cristofaro, Tiziana
Varriale, Massimo
Zannini, Giuseppa
Ronchi, Andrea
La Mantia, Elvira
Campobasso, Carlo Pietro
De Micco, Francesco
Mascolo, Pasquale
Municinò, Maurizio
Municinò, Emilia
Vestini, Francesco
Pinto, Omero
Moccia, Marta
De Stefano, Noè
Nappi, Oscar
Sementa, Carmen
Zotti, Giovanni
Pianese, Lamberto
Giordano, Carmela
Franco, Renato
author_facet Zito Marino, Federica
De Cristofaro, Tiziana
Varriale, Massimo
Zannini, Giuseppa
Ronchi, Andrea
La Mantia, Elvira
Campobasso, Carlo Pietro
De Micco, Francesco
Mascolo, Pasquale
Municinò, Maurizio
Municinò, Emilia
Vestini, Francesco
Pinto, Omero
Moccia, Marta
De Stefano, Noè
Nappi, Oscar
Sementa, Carmen
Zotti, Giovanni
Pianese, Lamberto
Giordano, Carmela
Franco, Renato
author_sort Zito Marino, Federica
collection PubMed
description Post-mortem examination plays a pivotal role in understanding the pathobiology of the SARS-CoV-2; thus, the optimization of virus detection on the post-mortem formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is needed. Different techniques are available for the identification of the SARS-CoV-2, including reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization (ISH), and electron microscopy. The main goal of this study is to compare ISH versus RT-PCR to detect SARS-CoV-2 on post-mortem lung samples of positive deceased subjects. A total of 27 samples were analyzed by RT-PCR targeting different viral RNA sequences of SARS-CoV-2, including envelope (E), nucleocapsid (N), spike (S), and open reading frame (ORF1ab) genes and ISH targeting S and Orf1ab. All 27 cases showed the N gene amplification, 22 out of 27 the E gene amplification, 26 out of 27 the S gene amplification, and only 6 the ORF1ab gene amplification. The S ISH was positive only in 12 out of 26 cases positive by RT-PCR. The S ISH positive cases with strong and diffuse staining showed a correlation with low values of the number of the amplification cycles by S RT-PCR suggesting that ISH is a sensitive assay mainly in cases carrying high levels of S RNA. In conclusion, our findings demonstrated that ISH assay has lower sensitivity to detect SARS-CoV-2 in FFPE compared to RT-PCR; however, it is able to localize the virus in the cellular context since it preserves the morphology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00428-021-03262-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8805427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88054272022-02-01 Variable levels of spike and ORF1ab RNA in post-mortem lung samples of SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects: comparison between ISH and RT-PCR Zito Marino, Federica De Cristofaro, Tiziana Varriale, Massimo Zannini, Giuseppa Ronchi, Andrea La Mantia, Elvira Campobasso, Carlo Pietro De Micco, Francesco Mascolo, Pasquale Municinò, Maurizio Municinò, Emilia Vestini, Francesco Pinto, Omero Moccia, Marta De Stefano, Noè Nappi, Oscar Sementa, Carmen Zotti, Giovanni Pianese, Lamberto Giordano, Carmela Franco, Renato Virchows Arch Original Article Post-mortem examination plays a pivotal role in understanding the pathobiology of the SARS-CoV-2; thus, the optimization of virus detection on the post-mortem formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is needed. Different techniques are available for the identification of the SARS-CoV-2, including reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization (ISH), and electron microscopy. The main goal of this study is to compare ISH versus RT-PCR to detect SARS-CoV-2 on post-mortem lung samples of positive deceased subjects. A total of 27 samples were analyzed by RT-PCR targeting different viral RNA sequences of SARS-CoV-2, including envelope (E), nucleocapsid (N), spike (S), and open reading frame (ORF1ab) genes and ISH targeting S and Orf1ab. All 27 cases showed the N gene amplification, 22 out of 27 the E gene amplification, 26 out of 27 the S gene amplification, and only 6 the ORF1ab gene amplification. The S ISH was positive only in 12 out of 26 cases positive by RT-PCR. The S ISH positive cases with strong and diffuse staining showed a correlation with low values of the number of the amplification cycles by S RT-PCR suggesting that ISH is a sensitive assay mainly in cases carrying high levels of S RNA. In conclusion, our findings demonstrated that ISH assay has lower sensitivity to detect SARS-CoV-2 in FFPE compared to RT-PCR; however, it is able to localize the virus in the cellular context since it preserves the morphology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00428-021-03262-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-01 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8805427/ /pubmed/35103846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03262-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zito Marino, Federica
De Cristofaro, Tiziana
Varriale, Massimo
Zannini, Giuseppa
Ronchi, Andrea
La Mantia, Elvira
Campobasso, Carlo Pietro
De Micco, Francesco
Mascolo, Pasquale
Municinò, Maurizio
Municinò, Emilia
Vestini, Francesco
Pinto, Omero
Moccia, Marta
De Stefano, Noè
Nappi, Oscar
Sementa, Carmen
Zotti, Giovanni
Pianese, Lamberto
Giordano, Carmela
Franco, Renato
Variable levels of spike and ORF1ab RNA in post-mortem lung samples of SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects: comparison between ISH and RT-PCR
title Variable levels of spike and ORF1ab RNA in post-mortem lung samples of SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects: comparison between ISH and RT-PCR
title_full Variable levels of spike and ORF1ab RNA in post-mortem lung samples of SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects: comparison between ISH and RT-PCR
title_fullStr Variable levels of spike and ORF1ab RNA in post-mortem lung samples of SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects: comparison between ISH and RT-PCR
title_full_unstemmed Variable levels of spike and ORF1ab RNA in post-mortem lung samples of SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects: comparison between ISH and RT-PCR
title_short Variable levels of spike and ORF1ab RNA in post-mortem lung samples of SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects: comparison between ISH and RT-PCR
title_sort variable levels of spike and orf1ab rna in post-mortem lung samples of sars-cov-2-positive subjects: comparison between ish and rt-pcr
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8805427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35103846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03262-8
work_keys_str_mv AT zitomarinofederica variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT decristofarotiziana variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT varrialemassimo variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT zanninigiuseppa variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT ronchiandrea variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT lamantiaelvira variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT campobassocarlopietro variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT demiccofrancesco variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT mascolopasquale variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT municinomaurizio variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT municinoemilia variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT vestinifrancesco variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT pintoomero variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT mocciamarta variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT destefanonoe variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT nappioscar variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT sementacarmen variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT zottigiovanni variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT pianeselamberto variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT giordanocarmela variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr
AT francorenato variablelevelsofspikeandorf1abrnainpostmortemlungsamplesofsarscov2positivesubjectscomparisonbetweenishandrtpcr