Cargando…

Pulse Oximeter App Privacy Policies During COVID-19: Scoping Assessment

BACKGROUND: Pulse oximeter apps became of interest to consumers during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly when traditional over-the-counter pulse oximeter devices were in short supply. Yet, no study to date has examined or scoped the state of privacy policies and notices for the top-rated and most...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hendricks-Sturrup, Rachele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8805452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084348
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30361
_version_ 1784643255744331776
author Hendricks-Sturrup, Rachele
author_facet Hendricks-Sturrup, Rachele
author_sort Hendricks-Sturrup, Rachele
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulse oximeter apps became of interest to consumers during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly when traditional over-the-counter pulse oximeter devices were in short supply. Yet, no study to date has examined or scoped the state of privacy policies and notices for the top-rated and most downloaded pulse oximeter apps during COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine, through a high-level qualitative assessment, the state and nature of privacy policies for the downloaded and top-rated pulse oximeter apps during the COVID-19 pandemic to (1) compare findings against comparable research involving other mobile health (mHealth) apps and (2) begin discussions on opportunities for future research or investigation. METHODS: During August-October 2020, privacy policies were reviewed for pulse oximeter apps that had either at least 500 downloads (Google Play Store apps only) or a three out of five-star rating (Apple Store apps only). In addition to determining if the apps had an accessible privacy policy, other key privacy policy–related details that were extracted included, but were not limited to, app developer location (country); whether the app was free or required paid use/subscription; whether an ads disclosure was provided on the app’s site; the scope of personal data collected; proportionality, fundamental rights, and data protection and privacy issues; and privacy safeguards. RESULTS: Six pulse oximeter apps met the inclusion criteria and only 33% (n=2) of the six apps had an accessible privacy policy that was specific to the pulse oximeter app feature (vs the app developer’s website or at all). Variation was found in both the regulatory nature and data privacy protections offered by pulse oximeter apps, with notable privacy protection limitations and gaps, although each app provided at least some information about the scope of personal data collected upon installing the app. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse oximeter app developers should invest in offering stronger privacy protections for their app users, and should provide more accessible and transparent privacy policies. This is a necessary first step to ensure that the data privacy of mHealth consumers is not exploited during public health emergency situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic, where over-the-counter personal health monitoring devices could be in short supply and patients and consumers may, as a result, turn to mHealth apps to fill such supply gaps. Future research considerations and recommendations are also suggested for mHealth technology and privacy researchers who are interested in examining privacy implications associated with the use of pulse oximeter apps during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8805452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88054522022-02-04 Pulse Oximeter App Privacy Policies During COVID-19: Scoping Assessment Hendricks-Sturrup, Rachele JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: Pulse oximeter apps became of interest to consumers during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly when traditional over-the-counter pulse oximeter devices were in short supply. Yet, no study to date has examined or scoped the state of privacy policies and notices for the top-rated and most downloaded pulse oximeter apps during COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine, through a high-level qualitative assessment, the state and nature of privacy policies for the downloaded and top-rated pulse oximeter apps during the COVID-19 pandemic to (1) compare findings against comparable research involving other mobile health (mHealth) apps and (2) begin discussions on opportunities for future research or investigation. METHODS: During August-October 2020, privacy policies were reviewed for pulse oximeter apps that had either at least 500 downloads (Google Play Store apps only) or a three out of five-star rating (Apple Store apps only). In addition to determining if the apps had an accessible privacy policy, other key privacy policy–related details that were extracted included, but were not limited to, app developer location (country); whether the app was free or required paid use/subscription; whether an ads disclosure was provided on the app’s site; the scope of personal data collected; proportionality, fundamental rights, and data protection and privacy issues; and privacy safeguards. RESULTS: Six pulse oximeter apps met the inclusion criteria and only 33% (n=2) of the six apps had an accessible privacy policy that was specific to the pulse oximeter app feature (vs the app developer’s website or at all). Variation was found in both the regulatory nature and data privacy protections offered by pulse oximeter apps, with notable privacy protection limitations and gaps, although each app provided at least some information about the scope of personal data collected upon installing the app. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse oximeter app developers should invest in offering stronger privacy protections for their app users, and should provide more accessible and transparent privacy policies. This is a necessary first step to ensure that the data privacy of mHealth consumers is not exploited during public health emergency situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic, where over-the-counter personal health monitoring devices could be in short supply and patients and consumers may, as a result, turn to mHealth apps to fill such supply gaps. Future research considerations and recommendations are also suggested for mHealth technology and privacy researchers who are interested in examining privacy implications associated with the use of pulse oximeter apps during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. JMIR Publications 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8805452/ /pubmed/35084348 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30361 Text en ©Rachele Hendricks-Sturrup. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 27.01.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Hendricks-Sturrup, Rachele
Pulse Oximeter App Privacy Policies During COVID-19: Scoping Assessment
title Pulse Oximeter App Privacy Policies During COVID-19: Scoping Assessment
title_full Pulse Oximeter App Privacy Policies During COVID-19: Scoping Assessment
title_fullStr Pulse Oximeter App Privacy Policies During COVID-19: Scoping Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Pulse Oximeter App Privacy Policies During COVID-19: Scoping Assessment
title_short Pulse Oximeter App Privacy Policies During COVID-19: Scoping Assessment
title_sort pulse oximeter app privacy policies during covid-19: scoping assessment
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8805452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084348
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30361
work_keys_str_mv AT hendrickssturruprachele pulseoximeterappprivacypoliciesduringcovid19scopingassessment