Cargando…

Fine Particulate Matter and Lung Function among Burning-Exposed Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Workers

BACKGROUND: During the 2010 Deepwater Horizon (DWH) disaster, controlled burning was conducted to remove oil from the water. Workers near combustion sites were potentially exposed to increased fine particulate matter [with aerodynamic diameter [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text])] levels. Expos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Dazhe, Lawrence, Kaitlyn G., Pratt, Gregory C., Stenzel, Mark R., Stewart, Patricia A., Groth, Caroline P., Banerjee, Sudipto, Christenbury, Kate, Curry, Matthew D., Jackson, W. Braxton, Kwok, Richard K., Blair, Aaron, Engel, Lawrence S., Sandler, Dale P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Environmental Health Perspectives 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8805798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35103485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP8930
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: During the 2010 Deepwater Horizon (DWH) disaster, controlled burning was conducted to remove oil from the water. Workers near combustion sites were potentially exposed to increased fine particulate matter [with aerodynamic diameter [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text])] levels. Exposure to [Formula: see text] has been linked to decreased lung function, but to our knowledge, no study has examined exposure encountered in an oil spill cleanup. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the association between estimated [Formula: see text] only from burning/flaring of oil/gas and lung function measured 1–3 y after the DWH disaster. METHODS: We included workers who participated in response and cleanup activities on the water during the DWH disaster and had lung function measured at a subsequent home visit ([Formula: see text]). [Formula: see text] concentrations were estimated using a Gaussian plume dispersion model and linked to work histories via a job-exposure matrix. We evaluated forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1; milliliters), forced vital capacity (FVC; milliliters), and their ratio (FEV1/FVC; %) in relation to average and cumulative daily maximum exposures using multivariable linear regressions. RESULTS: We observed significant exposure–response trends associating higher cumulative daily maximum [Formula: see text] exposure with lower FEV1 ([Formula: see text]) and FEV1/FVC ([Formula: see text]). In comparison with the referent group (workers not involved in or near the burning), those with higher cumulative exposures had lower FEV1 [[Formula: see text] , 95% confidence interval (CI): [Formula: see text] , 3.7] and FEV1/FVC ([Formula: see text] , 95% CI: [Formula: see text] , 0.2). We also saw nonsignificant reductions in FVC (high vs. referent: [Formula: see text] , 95% CI: [Formula: see text] , 77.6; [Formula: see text]). Similar associations were seen for average daily maximum [Formula: see text] exposure. Inverse associations were also observed in analyses stratified by smoking and time from exposure to spirometry and when we restricted to workers without prespill lung disease. CONCLUSIONS: Among oil spill workers, exposure to [Formula: see text] specifically from controlled burning of oil/gas was associated with significantly lower FEV1 and FEV1/FVC when compared with workers not involved in burning. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP8930