Cargando…

Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The recurrence rate of spontaneous preterm birth is high, and additional preventive measures are required. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin compared to placebo in the prevention of pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Landman, Anadeijda J. E. M. C., de Boer, Marjon A., Visser, Laura, Nijman, Tobias A. J., Hemels, Marieke A. C., Naaktgeboren, Christiana N., van der Weide, Marijke C., Mol, Ben W., van Laar, Judith O. E. H., Papatsonis, Dimitri N. M., Bekker, Mireille N., van Drongelen, Joris, van Pampus, Mariëlle G., Sueters, Marieke, van der Ham, David P., Sikkema, J. Marko, Zwart, Joost J., Huisjes, Anjoke J. M., van Huizen, Marloes E., Kleiverda, Gunilla, Boon, Janine, Franssen, Maureen T. M., Hermes, Wietske, Visser, Harry, de Groot, Christianne J. M., Oudijk, Martijn A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8806064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35104279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003892
_version_ 1784643365824888832
author Landman, Anadeijda J. E. M. C.
de Boer, Marjon A.
Visser, Laura
Nijman, Tobias A. J.
Hemels, Marieke A. C.
Naaktgeboren, Christiana N.
van der Weide, Marijke C.
Mol, Ben W.
van Laar, Judith O. E. H.
Papatsonis, Dimitri N. M.
Bekker, Mireille N.
van Drongelen, Joris
van Pampus, Mariëlle G.
Sueters, Marieke
van der Ham, David P.
Sikkema, J. Marko
Zwart, Joost J.
Huisjes, Anjoke J. M.
van Huizen, Marloes E.
Kleiverda, Gunilla
Boon, Janine
Franssen, Maureen T. M.
Hermes, Wietske
Visser, Harry
de Groot, Christianne J. M.
Oudijk, Martijn A.
author_facet Landman, Anadeijda J. E. M. C.
de Boer, Marjon A.
Visser, Laura
Nijman, Tobias A. J.
Hemels, Marieke A. C.
Naaktgeboren, Christiana N.
van der Weide, Marijke C.
Mol, Ben W.
van Laar, Judith O. E. H.
Papatsonis, Dimitri N. M.
Bekker, Mireille N.
van Drongelen, Joris
van Pampus, Mariëlle G.
Sueters, Marieke
van der Ham, David P.
Sikkema, J. Marko
Zwart, Joost J.
Huisjes, Anjoke J. M.
van Huizen, Marloes E.
Kleiverda, Gunilla
Boon, Janine
Franssen, Maureen T. M.
Hermes, Wietske
Visser, Harry
de Groot, Christianne J. M.
Oudijk, Martijn A.
author_sort Landman, Anadeijda J. E. M. C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The recurrence rate of spontaneous preterm birth is high, and additional preventive measures are required. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin compared to placebo in the prevention of preterm birth in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a parallel multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (the APRIL study). The study was performed in 8 tertiary and 26 secondary care hospitals in the Netherlands. We included women with a singleton pregnancy and a history of spontaneous preterm birth of a singleton between 22 and 37 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned to aspirin 80 mg daily or placebo initiated between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation and continued until 36 weeks or delivery. Randomisation was computer generated, with allocation concealment by using sequentially numbered medication containers. Participants, their healthcare providers, and researchers were blinded for treatment allocation. The primary outcome was preterm birth <37 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes included a composite of poor neonatal outcome (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, periventricular leukomalacia > grade 1, intraventricular hemorrhage > grade 2, necrotising enterocolitis > stage 1, retinopathy of prematurity, culture proven sepsis, or perinatal death). Analyses were performed by intention to treat. From May 31, 2016 to June 13, 2019, 406 women were randomised to aspirin (n = 204) or placebo (n = 202). A total of 387 women (81.1% of white ethnic origin, mean age 32.5 ± SD 3.8) were included in the final analysis: 194 women were allocated to aspirin and 193 to placebo. Preterm birth <37 weeks occurred in 41 (21.2%) women in the aspirin group and 49 (25.4%) in the placebo group (relative risk (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 1.20, p = 0.32). In women with ≥80% medication adherence, preterm birth occurred in 24 (19.2%) versus 30 (24.8%) women (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.25, p = 0.29). The rate of the composite of poor neonatal outcome was 4.6% (n = 9) versus 2.6% (n = 5) (RR 1.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.25, p = 0.29). Among all randomised women, serious adverse events occurred in 11 out of 204 (5.4%) women allocated to aspirin and 11 out of 202 (5.4%) women allocated to placebo. None of these serious adverse events was considered to be associated with treatment allocation. The main study limitation is the underpowered sample size due to the lower than expected preterm birth rates. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed that low-dose aspirin did not significantly reduce the preterm birth rate in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. However, a modest reduction of preterm birth with aspirin cannot be ruled out. Further research is required to determine a possible beneficial effect of low-dose aspirin for women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register (NL5553, NTR5675) https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5553.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8806064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88060642022-02-02 Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial Landman, Anadeijda J. E. M. C. de Boer, Marjon A. Visser, Laura Nijman, Tobias A. J. Hemels, Marieke A. C. Naaktgeboren, Christiana N. van der Weide, Marijke C. Mol, Ben W. van Laar, Judith O. E. H. Papatsonis, Dimitri N. M. Bekker, Mireille N. van Drongelen, Joris van Pampus, Mariëlle G. Sueters, Marieke van der Ham, David P. Sikkema, J. Marko Zwart, Joost J. Huisjes, Anjoke J. M. van Huizen, Marloes E. Kleiverda, Gunilla Boon, Janine Franssen, Maureen T. M. Hermes, Wietske Visser, Harry de Groot, Christianne J. M. Oudijk, Martijn A. PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The recurrence rate of spontaneous preterm birth is high, and additional preventive measures are required. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin compared to placebo in the prevention of preterm birth in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a parallel multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (the APRIL study). The study was performed in 8 tertiary and 26 secondary care hospitals in the Netherlands. We included women with a singleton pregnancy and a history of spontaneous preterm birth of a singleton between 22 and 37 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned to aspirin 80 mg daily or placebo initiated between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation and continued until 36 weeks or delivery. Randomisation was computer generated, with allocation concealment by using sequentially numbered medication containers. Participants, their healthcare providers, and researchers were blinded for treatment allocation. The primary outcome was preterm birth <37 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes included a composite of poor neonatal outcome (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, periventricular leukomalacia > grade 1, intraventricular hemorrhage > grade 2, necrotising enterocolitis > stage 1, retinopathy of prematurity, culture proven sepsis, or perinatal death). Analyses were performed by intention to treat. From May 31, 2016 to June 13, 2019, 406 women were randomised to aspirin (n = 204) or placebo (n = 202). A total of 387 women (81.1% of white ethnic origin, mean age 32.5 ± SD 3.8) were included in the final analysis: 194 women were allocated to aspirin and 193 to placebo. Preterm birth <37 weeks occurred in 41 (21.2%) women in the aspirin group and 49 (25.4%) in the placebo group (relative risk (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 1.20, p = 0.32). In women with ≥80% medication adherence, preterm birth occurred in 24 (19.2%) versus 30 (24.8%) women (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.25, p = 0.29). The rate of the composite of poor neonatal outcome was 4.6% (n = 9) versus 2.6% (n = 5) (RR 1.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.25, p = 0.29). Among all randomised women, serious adverse events occurred in 11 out of 204 (5.4%) women allocated to aspirin and 11 out of 202 (5.4%) women allocated to placebo. None of these serious adverse events was considered to be associated with treatment allocation. The main study limitation is the underpowered sample size due to the lower than expected preterm birth rates. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed that low-dose aspirin did not significantly reduce the preterm birth rate in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. However, a modest reduction of preterm birth with aspirin cannot be ruled out. Further research is required to determine a possible beneficial effect of low-dose aspirin for women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register (NL5553, NTR5675) https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5553. Public Library of Science 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8806064/ /pubmed/35104279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003892 Text en © 2022 Landman et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Landman, Anadeijda J. E. M. C.
de Boer, Marjon A.
Visser, Laura
Nijman, Tobias A. J.
Hemels, Marieke A. C.
Naaktgeboren, Christiana N.
van der Weide, Marijke C.
Mol, Ben W.
van Laar, Judith O. E. H.
Papatsonis, Dimitri N. M.
Bekker, Mireille N.
van Drongelen, Joris
van Pampus, Mariëlle G.
Sueters, Marieke
van der Ham, David P.
Sikkema, J. Marko
Zwart, Joost J.
Huisjes, Anjoke J. M.
van Huizen, Marloes E.
Kleiverda, Gunilla
Boon, Janine
Franssen, Maureen T. M.
Hermes, Wietske
Visser, Harry
de Groot, Christianne J. M.
Oudijk, Martijn A.
Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
title Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
title_full Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
title_short Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
title_sort evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the april study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8806064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35104279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003892
work_keys_str_mv AT landmananadeijdajemc evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT deboermarjona evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT visserlaura evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT nijmantobiasaj evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT hemelsmariekeac evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT naaktgeborenchristianan evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT vanderweidemarijkec evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT molbenw evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT vanlaarjudithoeh evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT papatsonisdimitrinm evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT bekkermireillen evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT vandrongelenjoris evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT vanpampusmarielleg evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT suetersmarieke evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT vanderhamdavidp evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT sikkemajmarko evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT zwartjoostj evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT huisjesanjokejm evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT vanhuizenmarloese evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT kleiverdagunilla evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT boonjanine evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT franssenmaureentm evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT hermeswietske evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT visserharry evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT degrootchristiannejm evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT oudijkmartijna evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial