Cargando…
Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The recurrence rate of spontaneous preterm birth is high, and additional preventive measures are required. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin compared to placebo in the prevention of pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8806064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35104279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003892 |
_version_ | 1784643365824888832 |
---|---|
author | Landman, Anadeijda J. E. M. C. de Boer, Marjon A. Visser, Laura Nijman, Tobias A. J. Hemels, Marieke A. C. Naaktgeboren, Christiana N. van der Weide, Marijke C. Mol, Ben W. van Laar, Judith O. E. H. Papatsonis, Dimitri N. M. Bekker, Mireille N. van Drongelen, Joris van Pampus, Mariëlle G. Sueters, Marieke van der Ham, David P. Sikkema, J. Marko Zwart, Joost J. Huisjes, Anjoke J. M. van Huizen, Marloes E. Kleiverda, Gunilla Boon, Janine Franssen, Maureen T. M. Hermes, Wietske Visser, Harry de Groot, Christianne J. M. Oudijk, Martijn A. |
author_facet | Landman, Anadeijda J. E. M. C. de Boer, Marjon A. Visser, Laura Nijman, Tobias A. J. Hemels, Marieke A. C. Naaktgeboren, Christiana N. van der Weide, Marijke C. Mol, Ben W. van Laar, Judith O. E. H. Papatsonis, Dimitri N. M. Bekker, Mireille N. van Drongelen, Joris van Pampus, Mariëlle G. Sueters, Marieke van der Ham, David P. Sikkema, J. Marko Zwart, Joost J. Huisjes, Anjoke J. M. van Huizen, Marloes E. Kleiverda, Gunilla Boon, Janine Franssen, Maureen T. M. Hermes, Wietske Visser, Harry de Groot, Christianne J. M. Oudijk, Martijn A. |
author_sort | Landman, Anadeijda J. E. M. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The recurrence rate of spontaneous preterm birth is high, and additional preventive measures are required. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin compared to placebo in the prevention of preterm birth in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a parallel multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (the APRIL study). The study was performed in 8 tertiary and 26 secondary care hospitals in the Netherlands. We included women with a singleton pregnancy and a history of spontaneous preterm birth of a singleton between 22 and 37 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned to aspirin 80 mg daily or placebo initiated between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation and continued until 36 weeks or delivery. Randomisation was computer generated, with allocation concealment by using sequentially numbered medication containers. Participants, their healthcare providers, and researchers were blinded for treatment allocation. The primary outcome was preterm birth <37 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes included a composite of poor neonatal outcome (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, periventricular leukomalacia > grade 1, intraventricular hemorrhage > grade 2, necrotising enterocolitis > stage 1, retinopathy of prematurity, culture proven sepsis, or perinatal death). Analyses were performed by intention to treat. From May 31, 2016 to June 13, 2019, 406 women were randomised to aspirin (n = 204) or placebo (n = 202). A total of 387 women (81.1% of white ethnic origin, mean age 32.5 ± SD 3.8) were included in the final analysis: 194 women were allocated to aspirin and 193 to placebo. Preterm birth <37 weeks occurred in 41 (21.2%) women in the aspirin group and 49 (25.4%) in the placebo group (relative risk (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 1.20, p = 0.32). In women with ≥80% medication adherence, preterm birth occurred in 24 (19.2%) versus 30 (24.8%) women (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.25, p = 0.29). The rate of the composite of poor neonatal outcome was 4.6% (n = 9) versus 2.6% (n = 5) (RR 1.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.25, p = 0.29). Among all randomised women, serious adverse events occurred in 11 out of 204 (5.4%) women allocated to aspirin and 11 out of 202 (5.4%) women allocated to placebo. None of these serious adverse events was considered to be associated with treatment allocation. The main study limitation is the underpowered sample size due to the lower than expected preterm birth rates. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed that low-dose aspirin did not significantly reduce the preterm birth rate in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. However, a modest reduction of preterm birth with aspirin cannot be ruled out. Further research is required to determine a possible beneficial effect of low-dose aspirin for women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register (NL5553, NTR5675) https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5553. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8806064 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88060642022-02-02 Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial Landman, Anadeijda J. E. M. C. de Boer, Marjon A. Visser, Laura Nijman, Tobias A. J. Hemels, Marieke A. C. Naaktgeboren, Christiana N. van der Weide, Marijke C. Mol, Ben W. van Laar, Judith O. E. H. Papatsonis, Dimitri N. M. Bekker, Mireille N. van Drongelen, Joris van Pampus, Mariëlle G. Sueters, Marieke van der Ham, David P. Sikkema, J. Marko Zwart, Joost J. Huisjes, Anjoke J. M. van Huizen, Marloes E. Kleiverda, Gunilla Boon, Janine Franssen, Maureen T. M. Hermes, Wietske Visser, Harry de Groot, Christianne J. M. Oudijk, Martijn A. PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The recurrence rate of spontaneous preterm birth is high, and additional preventive measures are required. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin compared to placebo in the prevention of preterm birth in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a parallel multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (the APRIL study). The study was performed in 8 tertiary and 26 secondary care hospitals in the Netherlands. We included women with a singleton pregnancy and a history of spontaneous preterm birth of a singleton between 22 and 37 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned to aspirin 80 mg daily or placebo initiated between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation and continued until 36 weeks or delivery. Randomisation was computer generated, with allocation concealment by using sequentially numbered medication containers. Participants, their healthcare providers, and researchers were blinded for treatment allocation. The primary outcome was preterm birth <37 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes included a composite of poor neonatal outcome (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, periventricular leukomalacia > grade 1, intraventricular hemorrhage > grade 2, necrotising enterocolitis > stage 1, retinopathy of prematurity, culture proven sepsis, or perinatal death). Analyses were performed by intention to treat. From May 31, 2016 to June 13, 2019, 406 women were randomised to aspirin (n = 204) or placebo (n = 202). A total of 387 women (81.1% of white ethnic origin, mean age 32.5 ± SD 3.8) were included in the final analysis: 194 women were allocated to aspirin and 193 to placebo. Preterm birth <37 weeks occurred in 41 (21.2%) women in the aspirin group and 49 (25.4%) in the placebo group (relative risk (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 1.20, p = 0.32). In women with ≥80% medication adherence, preterm birth occurred in 24 (19.2%) versus 30 (24.8%) women (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.25, p = 0.29). The rate of the composite of poor neonatal outcome was 4.6% (n = 9) versus 2.6% (n = 5) (RR 1.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.25, p = 0.29). Among all randomised women, serious adverse events occurred in 11 out of 204 (5.4%) women allocated to aspirin and 11 out of 202 (5.4%) women allocated to placebo. None of these serious adverse events was considered to be associated with treatment allocation. The main study limitation is the underpowered sample size due to the lower than expected preterm birth rates. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed that low-dose aspirin did not significantly reduce the preterm birth rate in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. However, a modest reduction of preterm birth with aspirin cannot be ruled out. Further research is required to determine a possible beneficial effect of low-dose aspirin for women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register (NL5553, NTR5675) https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5553. Public Library of Science 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8806064/ /pubmed/35104279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003892 Text en © 2022 Landman et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Landman, Anadeijda J. E. M. C. de Boer, Marjon A. Visser, Laura Nijman, Tobias A. J. Hemels, Marieke A. C. Naaktgeboren, Christiana N. van der Weide, Marijke C. Mol, Ben W. van Laar, Judith O. E. H. Papatsonis, Dimitri N. M. Bekker, Mireille N. van Drongelen, Joris van Pampus, Mariëlle G. Sueters, Marieke van der Ham, David P. Sikkema, J. Marko Zwart, Joost J. Huisjes, Anjoke J. M. van Huizen, Marloes E. Kleiverda, Gunilla Boon, Janine Franssen, Maureen T. M. Hermes, Wietske Visser, Harry de Groot, Christianne J. M. Oudijk, Martijn A. Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial |
title | Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial |
title_full | Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial |
title_short | Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial |
title_sort | evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the april study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8806064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35104279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003892 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT landmananadeijdajemc evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT deboermarjona evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT visserlaura evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT nijmantobiasaj evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT hemelsmariekeac evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT naaktgeborenchristianan evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT vanderweidemarijkec evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT molbenw evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT vanlaarjudithoeh evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT papatsonisdimitrinm evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT bekkermireillen evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT vandrongelenjoris evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT vanpampusmarielleg evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT suetersmarieke evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT vanderhamdavidp evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT sikkemajmarko evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT zwartjoostj evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT huisjesanjokejm evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT vanhuizenmarloese evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT kleiverdagunilla evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT boonjanine evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT franssenmaureentm evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT hermeswietske evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT visserharry evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT degrootchristiannejm evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial AT oudijkmartijna evaluationoflowdoseaspirininthepreventionofrecurrentspontaneouspretermlabourtheaprilstudyamulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial |