Cargando…

The importance of cell culture parameter standardization: an assessment of the robustness of the 2102Ep reference cell line

Work undertaken using the embryonic carcinoma 2102Ep line, highlighted the requirement for robust, well-characterized and standardized protocols. A systematic approach utilizing ‘quick hit’ experiments demonstrated variability introduced into culture systems resulting from slight changes to culture...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kusena, James Willard Tonderai, Shariatzadeh, Maryam, Studd, Adam James, James, Jenna Rebekah, Thomas, Robert James, Wilson, Samantha Loiuse
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8806261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2020.1870074
_version_ 1784643405197869056
author Kusena, James Willard Tonderai
Shariatzadeh, Maryam
Studd, Adam James
James, Jenna Rebekah
Thomas, Robert James
Wilson, Samantha Loiuse
author_facet Kusena, James Willard Tonderai
Shariatzadeh, Maryam
Studd, Adam James
James, Jenna Rebekah
Thomas, Robert James
Wilson, Samantha Loiuse
author_sort Kusena, James Willard Tonderai
collection PubMed
description Work undertaken using the embryonic carcinoma 2102Ep line, highlighted the requirement for robust, well-characterized and standardized protocols. A systematic approach utilizing ‘quick hit’ experiments demonstrated variability introduced into culture systems resulting from slight changes to culture conditions (route A). This formed the basis for longitudinal experiments investigating long-term effects of culture parameters including seeding density and feeding regime (route B).Results demonstrated that specific growth rates (SGR) of passage 59 (P59) cells seeded at 20,000 cells/cm(2) and subjected to medium exchange after 48h prior to reseeding at 72h (route B2) on average was marginally higher than, P55 cells cultured under equivalent conditions (route A1); whereby SGR values were (0.021±0.004) and (0.019±0.004). Viability was higher in route B2 over 10 passages with average viability reported as (86.3%±8.1) compared to route A1 (83.3±8.8). The metabolite data demonstrated both culture route B1 (P57 cells seeded at 66,667 cells/cm(2)) and B2 had consistent-specific metabolite rates (SMR) for glucose, but SMR values of route B1 was consistently lower than route B2 (0.00001 mmol, cell-1.d-1 and 0.000025).Results revealed interactions between phenotype, SMR and feeding regime that may not be accurately reflected by growth rate or observed morphology. This implies that current schemes of protocol control do not adequately account for variability, since key cell characteristics, including phenotype and SMR, change regardless of standardized seeding densities. This highlights the need to control culture parameters through defined protocols, for processes that involve culture for therapeutic use, biologics production, and reference lines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8806261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88062612022-02-02 The importance of cell culture parameter standardization: an assessment of the robustness of the 2102Ep reference cell line Kusena, James Willard Tonderai Shariatzadeh, Maryam Studd, Adam James James, Jenna Rebekah Thomas, Robert James Wilson, Samantha Loiuse Bioengineered Research Paper Work undertaken using the embryonic carcinoma 2102Ep line, highlighted the requirement for robust, well-characterized and standardized protocols. A systematic approach utilizing ‘quick hit’ experiments demonstrated variability introduced into culture systems resulting from slight changes to culture conditions (route A). This formed the basis for longitudinal experiments investigating long-term effects of culture parameters including seeding density and feeding regime (route B).Results demonstrated that specific growth rates (SGR) of passage 59 (P59) cells seeded at 20,000 cells/cm(2) and subjected to medium exchange after 48h prior to reseeding at 72h (route B2) on average was marginally higher than, P55 cells cultured under equivalent conditions (route A1); whereby SGR values were (0.021±0.004) and (0.019±0.004). Viability was higher in route B2 over 10 passages with average viability reported as (86.3%±8.1) compared to route A1 (83.3±8.8). The metabolite data demonstrated both culture route B1 (P57 cells seeded at 66,667 cells/cm(2)) and B2 had consistent-specific metabolite rates (SMR) for glucose, but SMR values of route B1 was consistently lower than route B2 (0.00001 mmol, cell-1.d-1 and 0.000025).Results revealed interactions between phenotype, SMR and feeding regime that may not be accurately reflected by growth rate or observed morphology. This implies that current schemes of protocol control do not adequately account for variability, since key cell characteristics, including phenotype and SMR, change regardless of standardized seeding densities. This highlights the need to control culture parameters through defined protocols, for processes that involve culture for therapeutic use, biologics production, and reference lines. Taylor & Francis 2021-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8806261/ /pubmed/33380247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2020.1870074 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Kusena, James Willard Tonderai
Shariatzadeh, Maryam
Studd, Adam James
James, Jenna Rebekah
Thomas, Robert James
Wilson, Samantha Loiuse
The importance of cell culture parameter standardization: an assessment of the robustness of the 2102Ep reference cell line
title The importance of cell culture parameter standardization: an assessment of the robustness of the 2102Ep reference cell line
title_full The importance of cell culture parameter standardization: an assessment of the robustness of the 2102Ep reference cell line
title_fullStr The importance of cell culture parameter standardization: an assessment of the robustness of the 2102Ep reference cell line
title_full_unstemmed The importance of cell culture parameter standardization: an assessment of the robustness of the 2102Ep reference cell line
title_short The importance of cell culture parameter standardization: an assessment of the robustness of the 2102Ep reference cell line
title_sort importance of cell culture parameter standardization: an assessment of the robustness of the 2102ep reference cell line
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8806261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2020.1870074
work_keys_str_mv AT kusenajameswillardtonderai theimportanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline
AT shariatzadehmaryam theimportanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline
AT studdadamjames theimportanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline
AT jamesjennarebekah theimportanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline
AT thomasrobertjames theimportanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline
AT wilsonsamanthaloiuse theimportanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline
AT kusenajameswillardtonderai importanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline
AT shariatzadehmaryam importanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline
AT studdadamjames importanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline
AT jamesjennarebekah importanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline
AT thomasrobertjames importanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline
AT wilsonsamanthaloiuse importanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline