Cargando…
The importance of cell culture parameter standardization: an assessment of the robustness of the 2102Ep reference cell line
Work undertaken using the embryonic carcinoma 2102Ep line, highlighted the requirement for robust, well-characterized and standardized protocols. A systematic approach utilizing ‘quick hit’ experiments demonstrated variability introduced into culture systems resulting from slight changes to culture...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8806261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2020.1870074 |
_version_ | 1784643405197869056 |
---|---|
author | Kusena, James Willard Tonderai Shariatzadeh, Maryam Studd, Adam James James, Jenna Rebekah Thomas, Robert James Wilson, Samantha Loiuse |
author_facet | Kusena, James Willard Tonderai Shariatzadeh, Maryam Studd, Adam James James, Jenna Rebekah Thomas, Robert James Wilson, Samantha Loiuse |
author_sort | Kusena, James Willard Tonderai |
collection | PubMed |
description | Work undertaken using the embryonic carcinoma 2102Ep line, highlighted the requirement for robust, well-characterized and standardized protocols. A systematic approach utilizing ‘quick hit’ experiments demonstrated variability introduced into culture systems resulting from slight changes to culture conditions (route A). This formed the basis for longitudinal experiments investigating long-term effects of culture parameters including seeding density and feeding regime (route B).Results demonstrated that specific growth rates (SGR) of passage 59 (P59) cells seeded at 20,000 cells/cm(2) and subjected to medium exchange after 48h prior to reseeding at 72h (route B2) on average was marginally higher than, P55 cells cultured under equivalent conditions (route A1); whereby SGR values were (0.021±0.004) and (0.019±0.004). Viability was higher in route B2 over 10 passages with average viability reported as (86.3%±8.1) compared to route A1 (83.3±8.8). The metabolite data demonstrated both culture route B1 (P57 cells seeded at 66,667 cells/cm(2)) and B2 had consistent-specific metabolite rates (SMR) for glucose, but SMR values of route B1 was consistently lower than route B2 (0.00001 mmol, cell-1.d-1 and 0.000025).Results revealed interactions between phenotype, SMR and feeding regime that may not be accurately reflected by growth rate or observed morphology. This implies that current schemes of protocol control do not adequately account for variability, since key cell characteristics, including phenotype and SMR, change regardless of standardized seeding densities. This highlights the need to control culture parameters through defined protocols, for processes that involve culture for therapeutic use, biologics production, and reference lines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8806261 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88062612022-02-02 The importance of cell culture parameter standardization: an assessment of the robustness of the 2102Ep reference cell line Kusena, James Willard Tonderai Shariatzadeh, Maryam Studd, Adam James James, Jenna Rebekah Thomas, Robert James Wilson, Samantha Loiuse Bioengineered Research Paper Work undertaken using the embryonic carcinoma 2102Ep line, highlighted the requirement for robust, well-characterized and standardized protocols. A systematic approach utilizing ‘quick hit’ experiments demonstrated variability introduced into culture systems resulting from slight changes to culture conditions (route A). This formed the basis for longitudinal experiments investigating long-term effects of culture parameters including seeding density and feeding regime (route B).Results demonstrated that specific growth rates (SGR) of passage 59 (P59) cells seeded at 20,000 cells/cm(2) and subjected to medium exchange after 48h prior to reseeding at 72h (route B2) on average was marginally higher than, P55 cells cultured under equivalent conditions (route A1); whereby SGR values were (0.021±0.004) and (0.019±0.004). Viability was higher in route B2 over 10 passages with average viability reported as (86.3%±8.1) compared to route A1 (83.3±8.8). The metabolite data demonstrated both culture route B1 (P57 cells seeded at 66,667 cells/cm(2)) and B2 had consistent-specific metabolite rates (SMR) for glucose, but SMR values of route B1 was consistently lower than route B2 (0.00001 mmol, cell-1.d-1 and 0.000025).Results revealed interactions between phenotype, SMR and feeding regime that may not be accurately reflected by growth rate or observed morphology. This implies that current schemes of protocol control do not adequately account for variability, since key cell characteristics, including phenotype and SMR, change regardless of standardized seeding densities. This highlights the need to control culture parameters through defined protocols, for processes that involve culture for therapeutic use, biologics production, and reference lines. Taylor & Francis 2021-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8806261/ /pubmed/33380247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2020.1870074 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Kusena, James Willard Tonderai Shariatzadeh, Maryam Studd, Adam James James, Jenna Rebekah Thomas, Robert James Wilson, Samantha Loiuse The importance of cell culture parameter standardization: an assessment of the robustness of the 2102Ep reference cell line |
title | The importance of cell culture parameter standardization: an assessment of the robustness of the 2102Ep reference cell line |
title_full | The importance of cell culture parameter standardization: an assessment of the robustness of the 2102Ep reference cell line |
title_fullStr | The importance of cell culture parameter standardization: an assessment of the robustness of the 2102Ep reference cell line |
title_full_unstemmed | The importance of cell culture parameter standardization: an assessment of the robustness of the 2102Ep reference cell line |
title_short | The importance of cell culture parameter standardization: an assessment of the robustness of the 2102Ep reference cell line |
title_sort | importance of cell culture parameter standardization: an assessment of the robustness of the 2102ep reference cell line |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8806261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2020.1870074 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kusenajameswillardtonderai theimportanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline AT shariatzadehmaryam theimportanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline AT studdadamjames theimportanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline AT jamesjennarebekah theimportanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline AT thomasrobertjames theimportanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline AT wilsonsamanthaloiuse theimportanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline AT kusenajameswillardtonderai importanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline AT shariatzadehmaryam importanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline AT studdadamjames importanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline AT jamesjennarebekah importanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline AT thomasrobertjames importanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline AT wilsonsamanthaloiuse importanceofcellcultureparameterstandardizationanassessmentoftherobustnessofthe2102epreferencecellline |