Cargando…

Prognostic Model for De Novo and Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has a heterogeneous clinical course. We sought to develop a prognostic model for overall survival (OS) that incorporated contemporary tumor and clinical factors for estimating individual prognosis. METHODS: We identified patients with MBC from our institution...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barcenas, Carlos H., Song, Juhee, Murthy, Rashmi K., Raghavendra, Akshara S., Li, Yisheng, Hsu, Limin, Carlson, Robert W., Tripathy, Debu, Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8807018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34351787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/CCI.21.00020
_version_ 1784643596991856640
author Barcenas, Carlos H.
Song, Juhee
Murthy, Rashmi K.
Raghavendra, Akshara S.
Li, Yisheng
Hsu, Limin
Carlson, Robert W.
Tripathy, Debu
Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
author_facet Barcenas, Carlos H.
Song, Juhee
Murthy, Rashmi K.
Raghavendra, Akshara S.
Li, Yisheng
Hsu, Limin
Carlson, Robert W.
Tripathy, Debu
Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
author_sort Barcenas, Carlos H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has a heterogeneous clinical course. We sought to develop a prognostic model for overall survival (OS) that incorporated contemporary tumor and clinical factors for estimating individual prognosis. METHODS: We identified patients with MBC from our institution diagnosed between 1998 and 2017. We developed OS prognostic models by Cox regression using demographic, tumor, and treatment variables. We assessed model predictive accuracy and estimated annual OS probabilities. We evaluated model discrimination and prediction calibration using an external validation data set from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. RESULTS: We identified 10,655 patients. A model using age at diagnosis, race or ethnicity, hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 subtype, de novo versus recurrent MBC categorized by metastasis-free interval, Karnofsky performance status, organ involvement, frontline biotherapy, frontline hormone therapy, and the interaction between variables significantly improved predictive accuracy (C-index, 0.731; 95% CI, 0.724 to 0.739) compared with a model with only hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status (C-index, 0.617; 95% CI, 0.609 to 0.626). The extended Cox regression model consisting of six independent models, for < 3, 3-14, 14-20, 20-33, 33-61, and ≥ 61 months, estimated up to 5 years of annual OS probabilities. The selected multifactor model had good discriminative ability but suboptimal calibration in the group of 2,334 National Comprehensive Cancer Network patients. A recalibration model that replaced the baseline survival function with the average of those from the training and validation data improved predictions across both data sets. CONCLUSION: We have generated and validated a robust prognostic OS model for MBC. This model can be used in clinical decision making and stratification in clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8807018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88070182022-02-02 Prognostic Model for De Novo and Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer Barcenas, Carlos H. Song, Juhee Murthy, Rashmi K. Raghavendra, Akshara S. Li, Yisheng Hsu, Limin Carlson, Robert W. Tripathy, Debu Hortobagyi, Gabriel N. JCO Clin Cancer Inform ORIGINAL REPORTS PURPOSE: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has a heterogeneous clinical course. We sought to develop a prognostic model for overall survival (OS) that incorporated contemporary tumor and clinical factors for estimating individual prognosis. METHODS: We identified patients with MBC from our institution diagnosed between 1998 and 2017. We developed OS prognostic models by Cox regression using demographic, tumor, and treatment variables. We assessed model predictive accuracy and estimated annual OS probabilities. We evaluated model discrimination and prediction calibration using an external validation data set from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. RESULTS: We identified 10,655 patients. A model using age at diagnosis, race or ethnicity, hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 subtype, de novo versus recurrent MBC categorized by metastasis-free interval, Karnofsky performance status, organ involvement, frontline biotherapy, frontline hormone therapy, and the interaction between variables significantly improved predictive accuracy (C-index, 0.731; 95% CI, 0.724 to 0.739) compared with a model with only hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status (C-index, 0.617; 95% CI, 0.609 to 0.626). The extended Cox regression model consisting of six independent models, for < 3, 3-14, 14-20, 20-33, 33-61, and ≥ 61 months, estimated up to 5 years of annual OS probabilities. The selected multifactor model had good discriminative ability but suboptimal calibration in the group of 2,334 National Comprehensive Cancer Network patients. A recalibration model that replaced the baseline survival function with the average of those from the training and validation data improved predictions across both data sets. CONCLUSION: We have generated and validated a robust prognostic OS model for MBC. This model can be used in clinical decision making and stratification in clinical trials. Wolters Kluwer Health 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8807018/ /pubmed/34351787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/CCI.21.00020 Text en © 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Barcenas, Carlos H.
Song, Juhee
Murthy, Rashmi K.
Raghavendra, Akshara S.
Li, Yisheng
Hsu, Limin
Carlson, Robert W.
Tripathy, Debu
Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
Prognostic Model for De Novo and Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer
title Prognostic Model for De Novo and Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer
title_full Prognostic Model for De Novo and Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Prognostic Model for De Novo and Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Model for De Novo and Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer
title_short Prognostic Model for De Novo and Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer
title_sort prognostic model for de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8807018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34351787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/CCI.21.00020
work_keys_str_mv AT barcenascarlosh prognosticmodelfordenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT songjuhee prognosticmodelfordenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT murthyrashmik prognosticmodelfordenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT raghavendraaksharas prognosticmodelfordenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT liyisheng prognosticmodelfordenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT hsulimin prognosticmodelfordenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT carlsonrobertw prognosticmodelfordenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT tripathydebu prognosticmodelfordenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT hortobagyigabrieln prognosticmodelfordenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer