Cargando…
Prognostic Model for De Novo and Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer
PURPOSE: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has a heterogeneous clinical course. We sought to develop a prognostic model for overall survival (OS) that incorporated contemporary tumor and clinical factors for estimating individual prognosis. METHODS: We identified patients with MBC from our institution...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8807018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34351787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/CCI.21.00020 |
_version_ | 1784643596991856640 |
---|---|
author | Barcenas, Carlos H. Song, Juhee Murthy, Rashmi K. Raghavendra, Akshara S. Li, Yisheng Hsu, Limin Carlson, Robert W. Tripathy, Debu Hortobagyi, Gabriel N. |
author_facet | Barcenas, Carlos H. Song, Juhee Murthy, Rashmi K. Raghavendra, Akshara S. Li, Yisheng Hsu, Limin Carlson, Robert W. Tripathy, Debu Hortobagyi, Gabriel N. |
author_sort | Barcenas, Carlos H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has a heterogeneous clinical course. We sought to develop a prognostic model for overall survival (OS) that incorporated contemporary tumor and clinical factors for estimating individual prognosis. METHODS: We identified patients with MBC from our institution diagnosed between 1998 and 2017. We developed OS prognostic models by Cox regression using demographic, tumor, and treatment variables. We assessed model predictive accuracy and estimated annual OS probabilities. We evaluated model discrimination and prediction calibration using an external validation data set from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. RESULTS: We identified 10,655 patients. A model using age at diagnosis, race or ethnicity, hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 subtype, de novo versus recurrent MBC categorized by metastasis-free interval, Karnofsky performance status, organ involvement, frontline biotherapy, frontline hormone therapy, and the interaction between variables significantly improved predictive accuracy (C-index, 0.731; 95% CI, 0.724 to 0.739) compared with a model with only hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status (C-index, 0.617; 95% CI, 0.609 to 0.626). The extended Cox regression model consisting of six independent models, for < 3, 3-14, 14-20, 20-33, 33-61, and ≥ 61 months, estimated up to 5 years of annual OS probabilities. The selected multifactor model had good discriminative ability but suboptimal calibration in the group of 2,334 National Comprehensive Cancer Network patients. A recalibration model that replaced the baseline survival function with the average of those from the training and validation data improved predictions across both data sets. CONCLUSION: We have generated and validated a robust prognostic OS model for MBC. This model can be used in clinical decision making and stratification in clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8807018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88070182022-02-02 Prognostic Model for De Novo and Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer Barcenas, Carlos H. Song, Juhee Murthy, Rashmi K. Raghavendra, Akshara S. Li, Yisheng Hsu, Limin Carlson, Robert W. Tripathy, Debu Hortobagyi, Gabriel N. JCO Clin Cancer Inform ORIGINAL REPORTS PURPOSE: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has a heterogeneous clinical course. We sought to develop a prognostic model for overall survival (OS) that incorporated contemporary tumor and clinical factors for estimating individual prognosis. METHODS: We identified patients with MBC from our institution diagnosed between 1998 and 2017. We developed OS prognostic models by Cox regression using demographic, tumor, and treatment variables. We assessed model predictive accuracy and estimated annual OS probabilities. We evaluated model discrimination and prediction calibration using an external validation data set from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. RESULTS: We identified 10,655 patients. A model using age at diagnosis, race or ethnicity, hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 subtype, de novo versus recurrent MBC categorized by metastasis-free interval, Karnofsky performance status, organ involvement, frontline biotherapy, frontline hormone therapy, and the interaction between variables significantly improved predictive accuracy (C-index, 0.731; 95% CI, 0.724 to 0.739) compared with a model with only hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status (C-index, 0.617; 95% CI, 0.609 to 0.626). The extended Cox regression model consisting of six independent models, for < 3, 3-14, 14-20, 20-33, 33-61, and ≥ 61 months, estimated up to 5 years of annual OS probabilities. The selected multifactor model had good discriminative ability but suboptimal calibration in the group of 2,334 National Comprehensive Cancer Network patients. A recalibration model that replaced the baseline survival function with the average of those from the training and validation data improved predictions across both data sets. CONCLUSION: We have generated and validated a robust prognostic OS model for MBC. This model can be used in clinical decision making and stratification in clinical trials. Wolters Kluwer Health 2021-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8807018/ /pubmed/34351787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/CCI.21.00020 Text en © 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL REPORTS Barcenas, Carlos H. Song, Juhee Murthy, Rashmi K. Raghavendra, Akshara S. Li, Yisheng Hsu, Limin Carlson, Robert W. Tripathy, Debu Hortobagyi, Gabriel N. Prognostic Model for De Novo and Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer |
title | Prognostic Model for De Novo and Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer |
title_full | Prognostic Model for De Novo and Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Model for De Novo and Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Model for De Novo and Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer |
title_short | Prognostic Model for De Novo and Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer |
title_sort | prognostic model for de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer |
topic | ORIGINAL REPORTS |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8807018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34351787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/CCI.21.00020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barcenascarlosh prognosticmodelfordenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT songjuhee prognosticmodelfordenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT murthyrashmik prognosticmodelfordenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT raghavendraaksharas prognosticmodelfordenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT liyisheng prognosticmodelfordenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT hsulimin prognosticmodelfordenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT carlsonrobertw prognosticmodelfordenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT tripathydebu prognosticmodelfordenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT hortobagyigabrieln prognosticmodelfordenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer |