Cargando…
Quality of Care Indicators for Hospital Physical Therapy Units: A Systematic Review
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to identify quality indicators described in the literature that may be used as quality measures in hospital physical therapy units. METHODS: The following sources were searched for quality indicators or articles: Web of Science, MEDLINE, IBECS, Latin America...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8807027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34935986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab261 |
_version_ | 1784643598497611776 |
---|---|
author | Angel-Garcia, Daniel Martinez-Nicolas, Ismael Salmeri, Bianca Monot, Alizée |
author_facet | Angel-Garcia, Daniel Martinez-Nicolas, Ismael Salmeri, Bianca Monot, Alizée |
author_sort | Angel-Garcia, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to identify quality indicators described in the literature that may be used as quality measures in hospital physical therapy units. METHODS: The following sources were searched for quality indicators or articles: Web of Science, MEDLINE, IBECS, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, Academic Search Complete, SportDiscus, SciELO, PsychINFO, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, and Scopus databases; the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, National Health System Indicator Portal, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development websites; and the National Quality Forum’s measures inventory tool. Search terms included “quality indicator,” “quality measure,” “physiotherapy,” and “physical therapy.” Inclusion criteria were articles written in English, Spanish, French, or Portuguese aimed at measuring the quality of care in hospital physical therapy units. Evidence-based indicators with an explicit formula were extracted by 2 independent reviewers and then classified using the structure-process-outcome model, quality domain, and categories defined by a consensus method. RESULTS: Of the 176 articles identified, only 19 met the criteria. From these articles and from the indicator repository searches, 178 clinical care indicators were included in the qualitative synthesis and presented in this paper. Process and outcome measures were prevalent, and 5 out of the 6 quality domains were represented. No efficiency measures were identified. Moreover, structure indicators, equity and accessibility indicators, and indicators in the cardiovascular and circulatory, mental health, pediatrics, and intensive care categories were underrepresented. CONCLUSIONS: A broad selection of quality indicators was identified from international resources, which can be used to measure the quality of physical therapy care in hospital units. IMPACT: This review identified 178 quality of care indicators that can be used in clinical practice monitoring and quality improvement of hospital physical therapy units. The results highlight a lack of accessibility, equity, and efficiency measures for physical therapy units. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8807027 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88070272022-02-02 Quality of Care Indicators for Hospital Physical Therapy Units: A Systematic Review Angel-Garcia, Daniel Martinez-Nicolas, Ismael Salmeri, Bianca Monot, Alizée Phys Ther Review OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to identify quality indicators described in the literature that may be used as quality measures in hospital physical therapy units. METHODS: The following sources were searched for quality indicators or articles: Web of Science, MEDLINE, IBECS, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, Academic Search Complete, SportDiscus, SciELO, PsychINFO, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, and Scopus databases; the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, National Health System Indicator Portal, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development websites; and the National Quality Forum’s measures inventory tool. Search terms included “quality indicator,” “quality measure,” “physiotherapy,” and “physical therapy.” Inclusion criteria were articles written in English, Spanish, French, or Portuguese aimed at measuring the quality of care in hospital physical therapy units. Evidence-based indicators with an explicit formula were extracted by 2 independent reviewers and then classified using the structure-process-outcome model, quality domain, and categories defined by a consensus method. RESULTS: Of the 176 articles identified, only 19 met the criteria. From these articles and from the indicator repository searches, 178 clinical care indicators were included in the qualitative synthesis and presented in this paper. Process and outcome measures were prevalent, and 5 out of the 6 quality domains were represented. No efficiency measures were identified. Moreover, structure indicators, equity and accessibility indicators, and indicators in the cardiovascular and circulatory, mental health, pediatrics, and intensive care categories were underrepresented. CONCLUSIONS: A broad selection of quality indicators was identified from international resources, which can be used to measure the quality of physical therapy care in hospital units. IMPACT: This review identified 178 quality of care indicators that can be used in clinical practice monitoring and quality improvement of hospital physical therapy units. The results highlight a lack of accessibility, equity, and efficiency measures for physical therapy units. Oxford University Press 2021-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8807027/ /pubmed/34935986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab261 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Physical Therapy Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Review Angel-Garcia, Daniel Martinez-Nicolas, Ismael Salmeri, Bianca Monot, Alizée Quality of Care Indicators for Hospital Physical Therapy Units: A Systematic Review |
title | Quality of Care Indicators for Hospital Physical Therapy Units: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Quality of Care Indicators for Hospital Physical Therapy Units: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Quality of Care Indicators for Hospital Physical Therapy Units: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of Care Indicators for Hospital Physical Therapy Units: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Quality of Care Indicators for Hospital Physical Therapy Units: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | quality of care indicators for hospital physical therapy units: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8807027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34935986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab261 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT angelgarciadaniel qualityofcareindicatorsforhospitalphysicaltherapyunitsasystematicreview AT martineznicolasismael qualityofcareindicatorsforhospitalphysicaltherapyunitsasystematicreview AT salmeribianca qualityofcareindicatorsforhospitalphysicaltherapyunitsasystematicreview AT monotalizee qualityofcareindicatorsforhospitalphysicaltherapyunitsasystematicreview |