Cargando…

Post-implementation perspectives on smokefree prison policy: a qualitative study with staff and people in custody

BACKGROUND: A comprehensive smokefree prison policy (SFPP) was introduced in Scottish prisons from November 2018, reflecting concern about inequalities in occupational exposures to second-hand smoke (SHS) and tobacco-related harms among people in custody (PiC). We aimed to address a gap, whereby few...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Ashley, Mitchell, Danielle, Hunt, Kate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8807073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34448834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckab075
_version_ 1784643607347593216
author Brown, Ashley
Mitchell, Danielle
Hunt, Kate
author_facet Brown, Ashley
Mitchell, Danielle
Hunt, Kate
author_sort Brown, Ashley
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A comprehensive smokefree prison policy (SFPP) was introduced in Scottish prisons from November 2018, reflecting concern about inequalities in occupational exposures to second-hand smoke (SHS) and tobacco-related harms among people in custody (PiC). We aimed to address a gap, whereby few studies have sought to understand SFPP from the perspectives of people living and working in prisons. METHODS: As part of a comprehensive evaluation, focus groups and interviews with staff (n = 99) and interviews with PiC (n = 23) were conducted 6–9 months post-implementation of SFPP in Scotland. Data were analysed using the framework approach. RESULTS: Our study found that new restrictions on smoking had been widely accepted by PiC, after a period of adjustment which was less troublesome than participants had anticipated. Benefits of the SFPP for the safety and comfort of staff and PiC who were no longer exposed to SHS, and additionally for the health of PiC who were now smoking-abstinent, were widely acknowledged. Drawbacks of the SFPP, such as difficulties managing without tobacco and use of alternatives (e.g. e-cigarettes and changes in use of illegal drugs), were also reported. Contraband tobacco was not reported to be a major problem following prisons becoming smokefree. CONCLUSIONS: The findings strengthen evidence that SFPPs can be implemented without causing major disruption and highlight the need for removal of tobacco to be underpinned by careful planning, partnership working and ensuring the availability of support for smokers. Experiences from Scotland may be of interest and some comfort, internationally for jurisdictions considering smoke-free rules in prisons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8807073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88070732022-02-02 Post-implementation perspectives on smokefree prison policy: a qualitative study with staff and people in custody Brown, Ashley Mitchell, Danielle Hunt, Kate Eur J Public Health Smoking BACKGROUND: A comprehensive smokefree prison policy (SFPP) was introduced in Scottish prisons from November 2018, reflecting concern about inequalities in occupational exposures to second-hand smoke (SHS) and tobacco-related harms among people in custody (PiC). We aimed to address a gap, whereby few studies have sought to understand SFPP from the perspectives of people living and working in prisons. METHODS: As part of a comprehensive evaluation, focus groups and interviews with staff (n = 99) and interviews with PiC (n = 23) were conducted 6–9 months post-implementation of SFPP in Scotland. Data were analysed using the framework approach. RESULTS: Our study found that new restrictions on smoking had been widely accepted by PiC, after a period of adjustment which was less troublesome than participants had anticipated. Benefits of the SFPP for the safety and comfort of staff and PiC who were no longer exposed to SHS, and additionally for the health of PiC who were now smoking-abstinent, were widely acknowledged. Drawbacks of the SFPP, such as difficulties managing without tobacco and use of alternatives (e.g. e-cigarettes and changes in use of illegal drugs), were also reported. Contraband tobacco was not reported to be a major problem following prisons becoming smokefree. CONCLUSIONS: The findings strengthen evidence that SFPPs can be implemented without causing major disruption and highlight the need for removal of tobacco to be underpinned by careful planning, partnership working and ensuring the availability of support for smokers. Experiences from Scotland may be of interest and some comfort, internationally for jurisdictions considering smoke-free rules in prisons. Oxford University Press 2021-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8807073/ /pubmed/34448834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckab075 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Smoking
Brown, Ashley
Mitchell, Danielle
Hunt, Kate
Post-implementation perspectives on smokefree prison policy: a qualitative study with staff and people in custody
title Post-implementation perspectives on smokefree prison policy: a qualitative study with staff and people in custody
title_full Post-implementation perspectives on smokefree prison policy: a qualitative study with staff and people in custody
title_fullStr Post-implementation perspectives on smokefree prison policy: a qualitative study with staff and people in custody
title_full_unstemmed Post-implementation perspectives on smokefree prison policy: a qualitative study with staff and people in custody
title_short Post-implementation perspectives on smokefree prison policy: a qualitative study with staff and people in custody
title_sort post-implementation perspectives on smokefree prison policy: a qualitative study with staff and people in custody
topic Smoking
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8807073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34448834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckab075
work_keys_str_mv AT brownashley postimplementationperspectivesonsmokefreeprisonpolicyaqualitativestudywithstaffandpeopleincustody
AT mitchelldanielle postimplementationperspectivesonsmokefreeprisonpolicyaqualitativestudywithstaffandpeopleincustody
AT huntkate postimplementationperspectivesonsmokefreeprisonpolicyaqualitativestudywithstaffandpeopleincustody