Cargando…

The ClearSight System for Postoperative Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring After Carotid Endarterectomy: A Validation Study

BACKGROUND: The majority of postoperative events in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are of hemodynamic origin, requiring preventive strict postoperative arterial blood pressure (BP) control. This study aimed to assess whether BP monitoring with noninvasive beat-to-beat ClearSight fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fassaert, Leonie M M, Plate, Joost D J, Westerink, Jan, Immink, Rogier V, de Borst, Gert J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8807161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34505631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpab140
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The majority of postoperative events in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are of hemodynamic origin, requiring preventive strict postoperative arterial blood pressure (BP) control. This study aimed to assess whether BP monitoring with noninvasive beat-to-beat ClearSight finger BP (BP(CS)) can replace invasive beat-to-beat radial artery BP (BP(RAD)) in the postoperative phase. METHODS: This study was a single-center clinical validation study using a prespecified study protocol. In 48 patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, BP(CS) and BP(RAD) were monitored ipsilateral in a simultaneous manner during a 6-hour period on the recovery unit following CEA. Primary endpoints were accuracy and precision of BP derived by ClearSight (Edward Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) vs. the reference standard (Arbocath 20 G, Hospira, Lake Forest, IL) to investigate if BP(CS) is a reliable noninvasive alternative for BP monitoring postoperatively in CEA patients. Validation was guided by the standard set by the Association for Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), considering a BP-monitor adequate when bias (precision) is <5 (8) mm Hg. Secondary endpoint was percentage under- and overtreatment, defined as exceedance of individual postoperative systolic BP threshold by BP(RAD) or BP(CS) in contrast to BP(CS) or BP(RAD), respectively. RESULTS: The bias (precision) of BP(CS) compared to BP(RAD) was −10 (13.6), 8 (7.2) and 4 (7.8) mm Hg for systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure (MAP), respectively. Based on BP(CS), undertreatment was 5.6% and overtreatment was 2.4%; however, percentages of undertreatment quadrupled for lower systolic BP thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive MAP, but not systolic and diastolic BP, was similar to invasive BP(RAD) during postoperative observation following CEA, based on AAMI criteria. However, as systolic BP is currently leading in postoperative monitoring to adjust BP therapy on, BP(CS) is not a reliable alternative for BP(RAD.)