Cargando…

Economic Model to Evaluate the Cost-Effectiveness of Second-Line Nilotinib Versus Dasatinib for the Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-CP) in Italy

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of second-line nilotinib versus dasatinib for the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) patients who are intolerant or resistant to imatinib and can transition to treatment-free remissio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonifacio, Massimiliano, Maheshwari, Vikalp, Tran, Diana, Agostoni, Gianluca, Filioussi, Kalitsa, Viana, Ricardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8807738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34297312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-021-00286-3
_version_ 1784643748489068544
author Bonifacio, Massimiliano
Maheshwari, Vikalp
Tran, Diana
Agostoni, Gianluca
Filioussi, Kalitsa
Viana, Ricardo
author_facet Bonifacio, Massimiliano
Maheshwari, Vikalp
Tran, Diana
Agostoni, Gianluca
Filioussi, Kalitsa
Viana, Ricardo
author_sort Bonifacio, Massimiliano
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of second-line nilotinib versus dasatinib for the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) patients who are intolerant or resistant to imatinib and can transition to treatment-free remission (TFR). METHODS: A partitioned survival model was developed to compare the cost effectiveness of nilotinib versus dasatinib. The model was developed from the Italian healthcare payer perspective and included the following health states: on second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), off second-line TKI, accelerated phase/blastic crisis, TFR, and death. Progression-free and overall survival curves were derived from patient-level data that compared nilotinib and dasatinib as second-line therapy in CML-CP patients who were resistant or intolerant to imatinib. Drug costs, healthcare costs, and adverse event costs were based on real-world evidence and publicly available databases. Cost effectiveness was estimated over a 40-year time horizon. Scenario analyses were performed by adjusting time horizon, TFR parameters, costs, and utilities. RESULTS: Second-line nilotinib resulted in greater time spent in TFR (0.91 life-years), increased quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (1.89), increased life-years (2.16), and decreased per-patient costs (− 38,760 €). Therefore, nilotinib was strongly dominant compared with dasatinib in the base-case analysis. Nilotinib remained strongly dominant in most scenario analyses including shorter time horizon, exclusion of TFR, and varying TKI drug costs. CONCLUSIONS: While the model showed that nilotinib treatment of imatinib-intolerant or resistant CML-CP patients was more effective and less costly than dasatinib treatment, there is considerable uncertainty in the findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-021-00286-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8807738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88077382022-02-02 Economic Model to Evaluate the Cost-Effectiveness of Second-Line Nilotinib Versus Dasatinib for the Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-CP) in Italy Bonifacio, Massimiliano Maheshwari, Vikalp Tran, Diana Agostoni, Gianluca Filioussi, Kalitsa Viana, Ricardo Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of second-line nilotinib versus dasatinib for the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) patients who are intolerant or resistant to imatinib and can transition to treatment-free remission (TFR). METHODS: A partitioned survival model was developed to compare the cost effectiveness of nilotinib versus dasatinib. The model was developed from the Italian healthcare payer perspective and included the following health states: on second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), off second-line TKI, accelerated phase/blastic crisis, TFR, and death. Progression-free and overall survival curves were derived from patient-level data that compared nilotinib and dasatinib as second-line therapy in CML-CP patients who were resistant or intolerant to imatinib. Drug costs, healthcare costs, and adverse event costs were based on real-world evidence and publicly available databases. Cost effectiveness was estimated over a 40-year time horizon. Scenario analyses were performed by adjusting time horizon, TFR parameters, costs, and utilities. RESULTS: Second-line nilotinib resulted in greater time spent in TFR (0.91 life-years), increased quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (1.89), increased life-years (2.16), and decreased per-patient costs (− 38,760 €). Therefore, nilotinib was strongly dominant compared with dasatinib in the base-case analysis. Nilotinib remained strongly dominant in most scenario analyses including shorter time horizon, exclusion of TFR, and varying TKI drug costs. CONCLUSIONS: While the model showed that nilotinib treatment of imatinib-intolerant or resistant CML-CP patients was more effective and less costly than dasatinib treatment, there is considerable uncertainty in the findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-021-00286-3. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8807738/ /pubmed/34297312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-021-00286-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Bonifacio, Massimiliano
Maheshwari, Vikalp
Tran, Diana
Agostoni, Gianluca
Filioussi, Kalitsa
Viana, Ricardo
Economic Model to Evaluate the Cost-Effectiveness of Second-Line Nilotinib Versus Dasatinib for the Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-CP) in Italy
title Economic Model to Evaluate the Cost-Effectiveness of Second-Line Nilotinib Versus Dasatinib for the Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-CP) in Italy
title_full Economic Model to Evaluate the Cost-Effectiveness of Second-Line Nilotinib Versus Dasatinib for the Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-CP) in Italy
title_fullStr Economic Model to Evaluate the Cost-Effectiveness of Second-Line Nilotinib Versus Dasatinib for the Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-CP) in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Economic Model to Evaluate the Cost-Effectiveness of Second-Line Nilotinib Versus Dasatinib for the Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-CP) in Italy
title_short Economic Model to Evaluate the Cost-Effectiveness of Second-Line Nilotinib Versus Dasatinib for the Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-CP) in Italy
title_sort economic model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of second-line nilotinib versus dasatinib for the treatment of philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (cml-cp) in italy
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8807738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34297312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-021-00286-3
work_keys_str_mv AT bonifaciomassimiliano economicmodeltoevaluatethecosteffectivenessofsecondlinenilotinibversusdasatinibforthetreatmentofphiladelphiachromosomepositivechronicmyeloidleukemiacmlcpinitaly
AT maheshwarivikalp economicmodeltoevaluatethecosteffectivenessofsecondlinenilotinibversusdasatinibforthetreatmentofphiladelphiachromosomepositivechronicmyeloidleukemiacmlcpinitaly
AT trandiana economicmodeltoevaluatethecosteffectivenessofsecondlinenilotinibversusdasatinibforthetreatmentofphiladelphiachromosomepositivechronicmyeloidleukemiacmlcpinitaly
AT agostonigianluca economicmodeltoevaluatethecosteffectivenessofsecondlinenilotinibversusdasatinibforthetreatmentofphiladelphiachromosomepositivechronicmyeloidleukemiacmlcpinitaly
AT filioussikalitsa economicmodeltoevaluatethecosteffectivenessofsecondlinenilotinibversusdasatinibforthetreatmentofphiladelphiachromosomepositivechronicmyeloidleukemiacmlcpinitaly
AT vianaricardo economicmodeltoevaluatethecosteffectivenessofsecondlinenilotinibversusdasatinibforthetreatmentofphiladelphiachromosomepositivechronicmyeloidleukemiacmlcpinitaly