Cargando…
Periosteal Flaps Enhance Prefabricated Engineered Bone Reparative Potential
The clinical translation of bone tissue engineering for reconstructing large bone defects has not advanced without hurdles. The in vivo bioreactor (IVB) concept may therefore bridge between bone tissue engineering and reconstructive surgery by employing the patient body for prefabricating new prevas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345211037247 |
_version_ | 1784643810446278656 |
---|---|
author | Abu-Shahba, A.G. Wilkman, T. Kornilov, R. Adam, M. Salla, K.M. Lindén, J. Lappalainen, A.K. Björkstrand, R. Seppänen-Kaijansinkko, R. Mannerström, B. |
author_facet | Abu-Shahba, A.G. Wilkman, T. Kornilov, R. Adam, M. Salla, K.M. Lindén, J. Lappalainen, A.K. Björkstrand, R. Seppänen-Kaijansinkko, R. Mannerström, B. |
author_sort | Abu-Shahba, A.G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The clinical translation of bone tissue engineering for reconstructing large bone defects has not advanced without hurdles. The in vivo bioreactor (IVB) concept may therefore bridge between bone tissue engineering and reconstructive surgery by employing the patient body for prefabricating new prevascularized tissues. Ideally, IVB should minimize the need for exogenous growth factors/cells. Periosteal tissues are promising for IVB approaches to prefabricate tissue-engineered bone (TEB) flaps. However, the significance of preserving the periosteal vascular supply has not been adequately investigated. This study assessed muscle IVB with and without periosteal/pericranial grafts and flaps for prefabricating TEB flaps to reconstruct mandibular defects in sheep. The sheep (n = 14) were allocated into 4 groups: muscle IVB (M group; n(M) = 3), muscle + periosteal graft (MP group; n(MP) = 4), muscle + periosteal flap (MVP group; n(MVP) = 4), and control group (n(Control) = 3). In the first surgery, alloplastic bone blocks were implanted in the brachiocephalic muscle (M) with a periosteal graft (MP) or with a vascularized periosteal flap (MVP). After 9 wk, the prefabricated TEB flaps were transplanted to reconstruct a mandibular angle defect. In the control group, the defects were reconstructed by non-prevascularized bone blocks. Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed after 13 wk and after 23 wk at termination, followed by micro-CT (µCT) and histological analyses. Both CT and µCT analysis revealed enhanced new bone formation and decreased residual biomaterial volume in the MVP group compared with control and MP groups, while the M group showed less new bone formation and more residual biomaterial. The histological analysis showed that most of the newly formed bone emerged from defect edges, but larger areas of new bone islands were found in MP and MVP groups. The MVP group showed enhanced vascularization and higher biomaterial remodeling rates. The periosteal flaps boosted the reconstructive potential of the prefabricated TEB flaps. The regenerative potential of the periosteum was manifested after the transplantation into the mechanically stimulated bony defect microenvironment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8808084 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88080842022-02-03 Periosteal Flaps Enhance Prefabricated Engineered Bone Reparative Potential Abu-Shahba, A.G. Wilkman, T. Kornilov, R. Adam, M. Salla, K.M. Lindén, J. Lappalainen, A.K. Björkstrand, R. Seppänen-Kaijansinkko, R. Mannerström, B. J Dent Res Research Reports The clinical translation of bone tissue engineering for reconstructing large bone defects has not advanced without hurdles. The in vivo bioreactor (IVB) concept may therefore bridge between bone tissue engineering and reconstructive surgery by employing the patient body for prefabricating new prevascularized tissues. Ideally, IVB should minimize the need for exogenous growth factors/cells. Periosteal tissues are promising for IVB approaches to prefabricate tissue-engineered bone (TEB) flaps. However, the significance of preserving the periosteal vascular supply has not been adequately investigated. This study assessed muscle IVB with and without periosteal/pericranial grafts and flaps for prefabricating TEB flaps to reconstruct mandibular defects in sheep. The sheep (n = 14) were allocated into 4 groups: muscle IVB (M group; n(M) = 3), muscle + periosteal graft (MP group; n(MP) = 4), muscle + periosteal flap (MVP group; n(MVP) = 4), and control group (n(Control) = 3). In the first surgery, alloplastic bone blocks were implanted in the brachiocephalic muscle (M) with a periosteal graft (MP) or with a vascularized periosteal flap (MVP). After 9 wk, the prefabricated TEB flaps were transplanted to reconstruct a mandibular angle defect. In the control group, the defects were reconstructed by non-prevascularized bone blocks. Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed after 13 wk and after 23 wk at termination, followed by micro-CT (µCT) and histological analyses. Both CT and µCT analysis revealed enhanced new bone formation and decreased residual biomaterial volume in the MVP group compared with control and MP groups, while the M group showed less new bone formation and more residual biomaterial. The histological analysis showed that most of the newly formed bone emerged from defect edges, but larger areas of new bone islands were found in MP and MVP groups. The MVP group showed enhanced vascularization and higher biomaterial remodeling rates. The periosteal flaps boosted the reconstructive potential of the prefabricated TEB flaps. The regenerative potential of the periosteum was manifested after the transplantation into the mechanically stimulated bony defect microenvironment. SAGE Publications 2021-09-11 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8808084/ /pubmed/34514892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345211037247 Text en © International Association for Dental Research and American Association for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Research 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Research Reports Abu-Shahba, A.G. Wilkman, T. Kornilov, R. Adam, M. Salla, K.M. Lindén, J. Lappalainen, A.K. Björkstrand, R. Seppänen-Kaijansinkko, R. Mannerström, B. Periosteal Flaps Enhance Prefabricated Engineered Bone Reparative Potential |
title | Periosteal Flaps Enhance Prefabricated Engineered Bone
Reparative Potential |
title_full | Periosteal Flaps Enhance Prefabricated Engineered Bone
Reparative Potential |
title_fullStr | Periosteal Flaps Enhance Prefabricated Engineered Bone
Reparative Potential |
title_full_unstemmed | Periosteal Flaps Enhance Prefabricated Engineered Bone
Reparative Potential |
title_short | Periosteal Flaps Enhance Prefabricated Engineered Bone
Reparative Potential |
title_sort | periosteal flaps enhance prefabricated engineered bone
reparative potential |
topic | Research Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345211037247 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abushahbaag periostealflapsenhanceprefabricatedengineeredbonereparativepotential AT wilkmant periostealflapsenhanceprefabricatedengineeredbonereparativepotential AT kornilovr periostealflapsenhanceprefabricatedengineeredbonereparativepotential AT adamm periostealflapsenhanceprefabricatedengineeredbonereparativepotential AT sallakm periostealflapsenhanceprefabricatedengineeredbonereparativepotential AT lindenj periostealflapsenhanceprefabricatedengineeredbonereparativepotential AT lappalainenak periostealflapsenhanceprefabricatedengineeredbonereparativepotential AT bjorkstrandr periostealflapsenhanceprefabricatedengineeredbonereparativepotential AT seppanenkaijansinkkor periostealflapsenhanceprefabricatedengineeredbonereparativepotential AT mannerstromb periostealflapsenhanceprefabricatedengineeredbonereparativepotential |