Cargando…

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and TLIF for Treatment of Lumbar Spine Stenosis

With the development of minimally invasive technology, minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion has become an effective way to treat lumbar spinal stenosis. Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the common diseases that cause backache or lumbago and sciatica. This article compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Guodong, Cao, Linzhong, Du, Xiaozheng, Xu, Bin, Zhang, Ping, Zhang, Xiaogang, Wang, Rong, Quan, Zhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9389239
_version_ 1784643837758537728
author Gao, Guodong
Cao, Linzhong
Du, Xiaozheng
Xu, Bin
Zhang, Ping
Zhang, Xiaogang
Wang, Rong
Quan, Zhen
author_facet Gao, Guodong
Cao, Linzhong
Du, Xiaozheng
Xu, Bin
Zhang, Ping
Zhang, Xiaogang
Wang, Rong
Quan, Zhen
author_sort Gao, Guodong
collection PubMed
description With the development of minimally invasive technology, minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion has become an effective way to treat lumbar spinal stenosis. Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the common diseases that cause backache or lumbago and sciatica. This article compares and analyzes the clinical efficacy of 60 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. It can be seen that the wound by MIS-TLIF is significantly less than that of traditional open surgery, and the postoperative recovery of MIS-TLIF is faster. So, MIS-TLIF is one of the concepts of minimally invasive surgery. The age distribution ranged from 56 to 78 years, with an average of 65.7 years. 31 cases were treated with MIS-TLIF (MIS-TLIF group), and 29 were treated with traditional posterior open surgery (TLIF group). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative drainage of the operation area were recorded. After statistical testing, the intraoperative blood loss, incision size, and postoperative drainage volume of the wound in the MIS-TLIF group were significantly less than those in the TLIF group. The results of JOA score, ODI score, and VAS score during the postoperative follow-up period were comparable to those of open surgery. Therefore, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is effective in treating lumbar spinal stenosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8808212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88082122022-02-03 Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and TLIF for Treatment of Lumbar Spine Stenosis Gao, Guodong Cao, Linzhong Du, Xiaozheng Xu, Bin Zhang, Ping Zhang, Xiaogang Wang, Rong Quan, Zhen J Healthc Eng Research Article With the development of minimally invasive technology, minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion has become an effective way to treat lumbar spinal stenosis. Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the common diseases that cause backache or lumbago and sciatica. This article compares and analyzes the clinical efficacy of 60 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. It can be seen that the wound by MIS-TLIF is significantly less than that of traditional open surgery, and the postoperative recovery of MIS-TLIF is faster. So, MIS-TLIF is one of the concepts of minimally invasive surgery. The age distribution ranged from 56 to 78 years, with an average of 65.7 years. 31 cases were treated with MIS-TLIF (MIS-TLIF group), and 29 were treated with traditional posterior open surgery (TLIF group). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative drainage of the operation area were recorded. After statistical testing, the intraoperative blood loss, incision size, and postoperative drainage volume of the wound in the MIS-TLIF group were significantly less than those in the TLIF group. The results of JOA score, ODI score, and VAS score during the postoperative follow-up period were comparable to those of open surgery. Therefore, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is effective in treating lumbar spinal stenosis. Hindawi 2022-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8808212/ /pubmed/35126956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9389239 Text en Copyright © 2022 Guodong Gao et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gao, Guodong
Cao, Linzhong
Du, Xiaozheng
Xu, Bin
Zhang, Ping
Zhang, Xiaogang
Wang, Rong
Quan, Zhen
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and TLIF for Treatment of Lumbar Spine Stenosis
title Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and TLIF for Treatment of Lumbar Spine Stenosis
title_full Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and TLIF for Treatment of Lumbar Spine Stenosis
title_fullStr Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and TLIF for Treatment of Lumbar Spine Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and TLIF for Treatment of Lumbar Spine Stenosis
title_short Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and TLIF for Treatment of Lumbar Spine Stenosis
title_sort comparison of minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and tlif for treatment of lumbar spine stenosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9389239
work_keys_str_mv AT gaoguodong comparisonofminimallyinvasivesurgerytransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionandtliffortreatmentoflumbarspinestenosis
AT caolinzhong comparisonofminimallyinvasivesurgerytransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionandtliffortreatmentoflumbarspinestenosis
AT duxiaozheng comparisonofminimallyinvasivesurgerytransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionandtliffortreatmentoflumbarspinestenosis
AT xubin comparisonofminimallyinvasivesurgerytransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionandtliffortreatmentoflumbarspinestenosis
AT zhangping comparisonofminimallyinvasivesurgerytransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionandtliffortreatmentoflumbarspinestenosis
AT zhangxiaogang comparisonofminimallyinvasivesurgerytransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionandtliffortreatmentoflumbarspinestenosis
AT wangrong comparisonofminimallyinvasivesurgerytransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionandtliffortreatmentoflumbarspinestenosis
AT quanzhen comparisonofminimallyinvasivesurgerytransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionandtliffortreatmentoflumbarspinestenosis