Cargando…
Patient experiences of co-designed rehabilitation interventions: protocol for a rapid review
INTRODUCTION: Patient-centred care can be facilitated by co-design, which refers to collaboration between healthcare professionals and consumers in producing and implementing healthcare. Systematic reviews on co-design have mainly focused on the effectiveness of co-produced healthcare interventions....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056927 |
_version_ | 1784643874196553728 |
---|---|
author | McKercher, Jonathan P Slade, Susan C Jazayeri, Jalal Hodge, Anita Knight, Matthew Green, Janet Woods, Jeffrey Morris, Meg E |
author_facet | McKercher, Jonathan P Slade, Susan C Jazayeri, Jalal Hodge, Anita Knight, Matthew Green, Janet Woods, Jeffrey Morris, Meg E |
author_sort | McKercher, Jonathan P |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Patient-centred care can be facilitated by co-design, which refers to collaboration between healthcare professionals and consumers in producing and implementing healthcare. Systematic reviews on co-design have mainly focused on the effectiveness of co-produced healthcare interventions. Less attention has been directed towards the experiences of patients in co-designed interventions. This rapid review aims to explore patient experiences of co-designed rehabilitation interventions and inform rehabilitation decision-making. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A rapid review will expedite timely information on co-design experiences for stakeholders. Four electronic databases, including Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL, will be searched for papers published from 1 January 2000 to 1 January 2022. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool will be used for randomised trials. Critical appraisal checklists from The Joanna Briggs Institute shall evaluate the risk of bias of non-randomised trials and qualitative studies. A narrative synthesis will be provided for the quantitative studies. Thematic synthesis will be conducted on qualitative findings. The overall strength of the evidence will be measured using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework for quantitative investigations and the GRADE-Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research for qualitative studies. The results will be presented using narrative summaries, identified themes, summary tables, flow charts and quantitative statistical analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for the review. The protocol and rapid review will be submitted to an online, open access and peer-reviewed journal for publication. The review findings will be rapidly translated to consumers, clinicians, healthcare leaders, organisations, researchers and policy makers via publications, evidence summaries, conferences, workshops, websites, social media and online events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021264547. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8808383 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88083832022-02-09 Patient experiences of co-designed rehabilitation interventions: protocol for a rapid review McKercher, Jonathan P Slade, Susan C Jazayeri, Jalal Hodge, Anita Knight, Matthew Green, Janet Woods, Jeffrey Morris, Meg E BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Patient-centred care can be facilitated by co-design, which refers to collaboration between healthcare professionals and consumers in producing and implementing healthcare. Systematic reviews on co-design have mainly focused on the effectiveness of co-produced healthcare interventions. Less attention has been directed towards the experiences of patients in co-designed interventions. This rapid review aims to explore patient experiences of co-designed rehabilitation interventions and inform rehabilitation decision-making. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A rapid review will expedite timely information on co-design experiences for stakeholders. Four electronic databases, including Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL, will be searched for papers published from 1 January 2000 to 1 January 2022. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool will be used for randomised trials. Critical appraisal checklists from The Joanna Briggs Institute shall evaluate the risk of bias of non-randomised trials and qualitative studies. A narrative synthesis will be provided for the quantitative studies. Thematic synthesis will be conducted on qualitative findings. The overall strength of the evidence will be measured using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework for quantitative investigations and the GRADE-Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research for qualitative studies. The results will be presented using narrative summaries, identified themes, summary tables, flow charts and quantitative statistical analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for the review. The protocol and rapid review will be submitted to an online, open access and peer-reviewed journal for publication. The review findings will be rapidly translated to consumers, clinicians, healthcare leaders, organisations, researchers and policy makers via publications, evidence summaries, conferences, workshops, websites, social media and online events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021264547. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8808383/ /pubmed/35105653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056927 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine McKercher, Jonathan P Slade, Susan C Jazayeri, Jalal Hodge, Anita Knight, Matthew Green, Janet Woods, Jeffrey Morris, Meg E Patient experiences of co-designed rehabilitation interventions: protocol for a rapid review |
title | Patient experiences of co-designed rehabilitation interventions: protocol for a rapid review |
title_full | Patient experiences of co-designed rehabilitation interventions: protocol for a rapid review |
title_fullStr | Patient experiences of co-designed rehabilitation interventions: protocol for a rapid review |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient experiences of co-designed rehabilitation interventions: protocol for a rapid review |
title_short | Patient experiences of co-designed rehabilitation interventions: protocol for a rapid review |
title_sort | patient experiences of co-designed rehabilitation interventions: protocol for a rapid review |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056927 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mckercherjonathanp patientexperiencesofcodesignedrehabilitationinterventionsprotocolforarapidreview AT sladesusanc patientexperiencesofcodesignedrehabilitationinterventionsprotocolforarapidreview AT jazayerijalal patientexperiencesofcodesignedrehabilitationinterventionsprotocolforarapidreview AT hodgeanita patientexperiencesofcodesignedrehabilitationinterventionsprotocolforarapidreview AT knightmatthew patientexperiencesofcodesignedrehabilitationinterventionsprotocolforarapidreview AT greenjanet patientexperiencesofcodesignedrehabilitationinterventionsprotocolforarapidreview AT woodsjeffrey patientexperiencesofcodesignedrehabilitationinterventionsprotocolforarapidreview AT morrismege patientexperiencesofcodesignedrehabilitationinterventionsprotocolforarapidreview |