Cargando…

Eliciting willingness-to-pay to prevent hospital medication administration errors in the UK: a contingent valuation survey

Medication errors are common in hospitals. These errors can result in adverse drug events (ADEs), which can reduce the health and well-being of patients’, and their relatives and caregivers. Interventions have been developed to reduce medication errors, including those that occur at the administrati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hill, Sarah R, Bhattarai, Nawaraj, Tolley, Clare L, Slight, Sarah P, Vale, Luke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053115
_version_ 1784643874435629056
author Hill, Sarah R
Bhattarai, Nawaraj
Tolley, Clare L
Slight, Sarah P
Vale, Luke
author_facet Hill, Sarah R
Bhattarai, Nawaraj
Tolley, Clare L
Slight, Sarah P
Vale, Luke
author_sort Hill, Sarah R
collection PubMed
description Medication errors are common in hospitals. These errors can result in adverse drug events (ADEs), which can reduce the health and well-being of patients’, and their relatives and caregivers. Interventions have been developed to reduce medication errors, including those that occur at the administration stage. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to elicit willingness-to-pay (WTP) values to prevent hospital medication administration errors. DESIGN AND SETTING: An online, contingent valuation (CV) survey was conducted, using the random card-sort elicitation method, to elicit WTP to prevent medication errors. PARTICIPANTS: A representative sample of the UK public. METHODS: Seven medication error scenarios, varying in the potential for harm and the severity of harm, were valued. Scenarios were developed with input from: clinical experts, focus groups with members of the public and piloting. Mean and median WTP values were calculated, excluding protest responses or those that failed a logic test. A two-part model (logit, generalised linear model) regression analysis was conducted to explore predictive characteristics of WTP. RESULTS: Responses were collected from 1001 individuals. The proportion of respondents willing to pay to prevent a medication error increased as the severity of the ADE increased and was highest for scenarios that described actual harm occurring. Mean WTP across the scenarios ranged from £45 (95% CI £36 to £54) to £278 (95% CI £200 to £355). Several factors influenced both the value and likelihood of WTP, such as: income, known experience of medication errors, sex, field of work, marriage status, education level and employment status. Predictors of WTP were not, however, consistent across scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: This CV study highlights how the UK public value preventing medication errors. The findings from this study could be used to carry out a cost–benefit analysis which could inform implementation decisions on the use of technology to reduce medication administration errors in UK hospitals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8808384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88083842022-02-09 Eliciting willingness-to-pay to prevent hospital medication administration errors in the UK: a contingent valuation survey Hill, Sarah R Bhattarai, Nawaraj Tolley, Clare L Slight, Sarah P Vale, Luke BMJ Open Health Economics Medication errors are common in hospitals. These errors can result in adverse drug events (ADEs), which can reduce the health and well-being of patients’, and their relatives and caregivers. Interventions have been developed to reduce medication errors, including those that occur at the administration stage. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to elicit willingness-to-pay (WTP) values to prevent hospital medication administration errors. DESIGN AND SETTING: An online, contingent valuation (CV) survey was conducted, using the random card-sort elicitation method, to elicit WTP to prevent medication errors. PARTICIPANTS: A representative sample of the UK public. METHODS: Seven medication error scenarios, varying in the potential for harm and the severity of harm, were valued. Scenarios were developed with input from: clinical experts, focus groups with members of the public and piloting. Mean and median WTP values were calculated, excluding protest responses or those that failed a logic test. A two-part model (logit, generalised linear model) regression analysis was conducted to explore predictive characteristics of WTP. RESULTS: Responses were collected from 1001 individuals. The proportion of respondents willing to pay to prevent a medication error increased as the severity of the ADE increased and was highest for scenarios that described actual harm occurring. Mean WTP across the scenarios ranged from £45 (95% CI £36 to £54) to £278 (95% CI £200 to £355). Several factors influenced both the value and likelihood of WTP, such as: income, known experience of medication errors, sex, field of work, marriage status, education level and employment status. Predictors of WTP were not, however, consistent across scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: This CV study highlights how the UK public value preventing medication errors. The findings from this study could be used to carry out a cost–benefit analysis which could inform implementation decisions on the use of technology to reduce medication administration errors in UK hospitals. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8808384/ /pubmed/35105580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053115 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Economics
Hill, Sarah R
Bhattarai, Nawaraj
Tolley, Clare L
Slight, Sarah P
Vale, Luke
Eliciting willingness-to-pay to prevent hospital medication administration errors in the UK: a contingent valuation survey
title Eliciting willingness-to-pay to prevent hospital medication administration errors in the UK: a contingent valuation survey
title_full Eliciting willingness-to-pay to prevent hospital medication administration errors in the UK: a contingent valuation survey
title_fullStr Eliciting willingness-to-pay to prevent hospital medication administration errors in the UK: a contingent valuation survey
title_full_unstemmed Eliciting willingness-to-pay to prevent hospital medication administration errors in the UK: a contingent valuation survey
title_short Eliciting willingness-to-pay to prevent hospital medication administration errors in the UK: a contingent valuation survey
title_sort eliciting willingness-to-pay to prevent hospital medication administration errors in the uk: a contingent valuation survey
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053115
work_keys_str_mv AT hillsarahr elicitingwillingnesstopaytopreventhospitalmedicationadministrationerrorsintheukacontingentvaluationsurvey
AT bhattarainawaraj elicitingwillingnesstopaytopreventhospitalmedicationadministrationerrorsintheukacontingentvaluationsurvey
AT tolleyclarel elicitingwillingnesstopaytopreventhospitalmedicationadministrationerrorsintheukacontingentvaluationsurvey
AT slightsarahp elicitingwillingnesstopaytopreventhospitalmedicationadministrationerrorsintheukacontingentvaluationsurvey
AT valeluke elicitingwillingnesstopaytopreventhospitalmedicationadministrationerrorsintheukacontingentvaluationsurvey