Cargando…

RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional–biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls—experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study

INTRODUCTION: Despite good clinical outcomes reported in the literature, to date, scientific evidence for the functional and biomechanical benefit of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with augmentation is scarce. We present an experimental protocol for a detailed multimodal (clinical,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller, Sebastian, Bühl, Linda, Nüesch, Corina, Pagenstert, Geert, Mündermann, Annegret, Egloff, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054709
_version_ 1784643887145418752
author Müller, Sebastian
Bühl, Linda
Nüesch, Corina
Pagenstert, Geert
Mündermann, Annegret
Egloff, Christian
author_facet Müller, Sebastian
Bühl, Linda
Nüesch, Corina
Pagenstert, Geert
Mündermann, Annegret
Egloff, Christian
author_sort Müller, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite good clinical outcomes reported in the literature, to date, scientific evidence for the functional and biomechanical benefit of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with augmentation is scarce. We present an experimental protocol for a detailed multimodal (clinical, socioeconomic, functional and biomechanical) comparative study in patients after primary ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation, patients after ACL reconstruction and healthy controls. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this non-randomised single-centre comparative study with prospective data collection with three arms (patients 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation; patients 2 years after ACL reconstruction using hamstring autografts; and healthy controls), 30 participants per study arm will be included. The study is designed as non-inferiority study with three arms. Required sample size was estimated based on data reported in the literature on muscle strength, proprioception and balance parameters, resulting in at least 28 participants per group. Outcome parameters include patient-reported outcome measures (EQ-5D-5L, Tegner Activity Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee and ACL-Return to Sports Injury Scale), socio-economic parameters, anterior tibial translation, range of motion and functional-biomechanical data of the lower extremities. Functional–biomechanical parameters include proprioception, isokinetic muscle strength, single-leg balance, walking, running and single-leg hops with additional lower extremity 3D joint kinematics and kinetics and muscle activity. These parameters will be compared between limbs in patients, between groups and to the current literature. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. Ethical approval was obtained by the regional ethics board (Ethics Committee Northwest Switzerland EKNZ 2020–00551), and the study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov. Trial registration number NCT04429165.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8808437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88084372022-02-09 RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional–biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls—experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study Müller, Sebastian Bühl, Linda Nüesch, Corina Pagenstert, Geert Mündermann, Annegret Egloff, Christian BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Despite good clinical outcomes reported in the literature, to date, scientific evidence for the functional and biomechanical benefit of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with augmentation is scarce. We present an experimental protocol for a detailed multimodal (clinical, socioeconomic, functional and biomechanical) comparative study in patients after primary ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation, patients after ACL reconstruction and healthy controls. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this non-randomised single-centre comparative study with prospective data collection with three arms (patients 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation; patients 2 years after ACL reconstruction using hamstring autografts; and healthy controls), 30 participants per study arm will be included. The study is designed as non-inferiority study with three arms. Required sample size was estimated based on data reported in the literature on muscle strength, proprioception and balance parameters, resulting in at least 28 participants per group. Outcome parameters include patient-reported outcome measures (EQ-5D-5L, Tegner Activity Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee and ACL-Return to Sports Injury Scale), socio-economic parameters, anterior tibial translation, range of motion and functional-biomechanical data of the lower extremities. Functional–biomechanical parameters include proprioception, isokinetic muscle strength, single-leg balance, walking, running and single-leg hops with additional lower extremity 3D joint kinematics and kinetics and muscle activity. These parameters will be compared between limbs in patients, between groups and to the current literature. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. Ethical approval was obtained by the regional ethics board (Ethics Committee Northwest Switzerland EKNZ 2020–00551), and the study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov. Trial registration number NCT04429165. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8808437/ /pubmed/35105587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054709 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Surgery
Müller, Sebastian
Bühl, Linda
Nüesch, Corina
Pagenstert, Geert
Mündermann, Annegret
Egloff, Christian
RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional–biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls—experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study
title RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional–biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls—experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study
title_full RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional–biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls—experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study
title_fullStr RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional–biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls—experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study
title_full_unstemmed RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional–biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls—experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study
title_short RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional–biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls—experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study
title_sort retrobrace: clinical, socioeconomic and functional–biomechanical outcomes 2 years after acl repair and internalbrace augmentation in comparison to acl reconstruction and healthy controls—experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054709
work_keys_str_mv AT mullersebastian retrobraceclinicalsocioeconomicandfunctionalbiomechanicaloutcomes2yearsafteraclrepairandinternalbraceaugmentationincomparisontoaclreconstructionandhealthycontrolsexperimentalprotocolofanonrandomisedsinglecentrecomparativestudy
AT buhllinda retrobraceclinicalsocioeconomicandfunctionalbiomechanicaloutcomes2yearsafteraclrepairandinternalbraceaugmentationincomparisontoaclreconstructionandhealthycontrolsexperimentalprotocolofanonrandomisedsinglecentrecomparativestudy
AT nueschcorina retrobraceclinicalsocioeconomicandfunctionalbiomechanicaloutcomes2yearsafteraclrepairandinternalbraceaugmentationincomparisontoaclreconstructionandhealthycontrolsexperimentalprotocolofanonrandomisedsinglecentrecomparativestudy
AT pagenstertgeert retrobraceclinicalsocioeconomicandfunctionalbiomechanicaloutcomes2yearsafteraclrepairandinternalbraceaugmentationincomparisontoaclreconstructionandhealthycontrolsexperimentalprotocolofanonrandomisedsinglecentrecomparativestudy
AT mundermannannegret retrobraceclinicalsocioeconomicandfunctionalbiomechanicaloutcomes2yearsafteraclrepairandinternalbraceaugmentationincomparisontoaclreconstructionandhealthycontrolsexperimentalprotocolofanonrandomisedsinglecentrecomparativestudy
AT egloffchristian retrobraceclinicalsocioeconomicandfunctionalbiomechanicaloutcomes2yearsafteraclrepairandinternalbraceaugmentationincomparisontoaclreconstructionandhealthycontrolsexperimentalprotocolofanonrandomisedsinglecentrecomparativestudy