Cargando…
RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional–biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls—experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study
INTRODUCTION: Despite good clinical outcomes reported in the literature, to date, scientific evidence for the functional and biomechanical benefit of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with augmentation is scarce. We present an experimental protocol for a detailed multimodal (clinical,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054709 |
_version_ | 1784643887145418752 |
---|---|
author | Müller, Sebastian Bühl, Linda Nüesch, Corina Pagenstert, Geert Mündermann, Annegret Egloff, Christian |
author_facet | Müller, Sebastian Bühl, Linda Nüesch, Corina Pagenstert, Geert Mündermann, Annegret Egloff, Christian |
author_sort | Müller, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Despite good clinical outcomes reported in the literature, to date, scientific evidence for the functional and biomechanical benefit of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with augmentation is scarce. We present an experimental protocol for a detailed multimodal (clinical, socioeconomic, functional and biomechanical) comparative study in patients after primary ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation, patients after ACL reconstruction and healthy controls. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this non-randomised single-centre comparative study with prospective data collection with three arms (patients 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation; patients 2 years after ACL reconstruction using hamstring autografts; and healthy controls), 30 participants per study arm will be included. The study is designed as non-inferiority study with three arms. Required sample size was estimated based on data reported in the literature on muscle strength, proprioception and balance parameters, resulting in at least 28 participants per group. Outcome parameters include patient-reported outcome measures (EQ-5D-5L, Tegner Activity Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee and ACL-Return to Sports Injury Scale), socio-economic parameters, anterior tibial translation, range of motion and functional-biomechanical data of the lower extremities. Functional–biomechanical parameters include proprioception, isokinetic muscle strength, single-leg balance, walking, running and single-leg hops with additional lower extremity 3D joint kinematics and kinetics and muscle activity. These parameters will be compared between limbs in patients, between groups and to the current literature. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. Ethical approval was obtained by the regional ethics board (Ethics Committee Northwest Switzerland EKNZ 2020–00551), and the study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov. Trial registration number NCT04429165. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8808437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88084372022-02-09 RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional–biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls—experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study Müller, Sebastian Bühl, Linda Nüesch, Corina Pagenstert, Geert Mündermann, Annegret Egloff, Christian BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Despite good clinical outcomes reported in the literature, to date, scientific evidence for the functional and biomechanical benefit of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with augmentation is scarce. We present an experimental protocol for a detailed multimodal (clinical, socioeconomic, functional and biomechanical) comparative study in patients after primary ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation, patients after ACL reconstruction and healthy controls. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this non-randomised single-centre comparative study with prospective data collection with three arms (patients 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation; patients 2 years after ACL reconstruction using hamstring autografts; and healthy controls), 30 participants per study arm will be included. The study is designed as non-inferiority study with three arms. Required sample size was estimated based on data reported in the literature on muscle strength, proprioception and balance parameters, resulting in at least 28 participants per group. Outcome parameters include patient-reported outcome measures (EQ-5D-5L, Tegner Activity Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee and ACL-Return to Sports Injury Scale), socio-economic parameters, anterior tibial translation, range of motion and functional-biomechanical data of the lower extremities. Functional–biomechanical parameters include proprioception, isokinetic muscle strength, single-leg balance, walking, running and single-leg hops with additional lower extremity 3D joint kinematics and kinetics and muscle activity. These parameters will be compared between limbs in patients, between groups and to the current literature. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. Ethical approval was obtained by the regional ethics board (Ethics Committee Northwest Switzerland EKNZ 2020–00551), and the study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov. Trial registration number NCT04429165. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8808437/ /pubmed/35105587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054709 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Surgery Müller, Sebastian Bühl, Linda Nüesch, Corina Pagenstert, Geert Mündermann, Annegret Egloff, Christian RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional–biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls—experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study |
title | RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional–biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls—experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study |
title_full | RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional–biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls—experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study |
title_fullStr | RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional–biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls—experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional–biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls—experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study |
title_short | RetroBRACE: clinical, socioeconomic and functional–biomechanical outcomes 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation in comparison to ACL reconstruction and healthy controls—experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study |
title_sort | retrobrace: clinical, socioeconomic and functional–biomechanical outcomes 2 years after acl repair and internalbrace augmentation in comparison to acl reconstruction and healthy controls—experimental protocol of a non-randomised single-centre comparative study |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054709 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullersebastian retrobraceclinicalsocioeconomicandfunctionalbiomechanicaloutcomes2yearsafteraclrepairandinternalbraceaugmentationincomparisontoaclreconstructionandhealthycontrolsexperimentalprotocolofanonrandomisedsinglecentrecomparativestudy AT buhllinda retrobraceclinicalsocioeconomicandfunctionalbiomechanicaloutcomes2yearsafteraclrepairandinternalbraceaugmentationincomparisontoaclreconstructionandhealthycontrolsexperimentalprotocolofanonrandomisedsinglecentrecomparativestudy AT nueschcorina retrobraceclinicalsocioeconomicandfunctionalbiomechanicaloutcomes2yearsafteraclrepairandinternalbraceaugmentationincomparisontoaclreconstructionandhealthycontrolsexperimentalprotocolofanonrandomisedsinglecentrecomparativestudy AT pagenstertgeert retrobraceclinicalsocioeconomicandfunctionalbiomechanicaloutcomes2yearsafteraclrepairandinternalbraceaugmentationincomparisontoaclreconstructionandhealthycontrolsexperimentalprotocolofanonrandomisedsinglecentrecomparativestudy AT mundermannannegret retrobraceclinicalsocioeconomicandfunctionalbiomechanicaloutcomes2yearsafteraclrepairandinternalbraceaugmentationincomparisontoaclreconstructionandhealthycontrolsexperimentalprotocolofanonrandomisedsinglecentrecomparativestudy AT egloffchristian retrobraceclinicalsocioeconomicandfunctionalbiomechanicaloutcomes2yearsafteraclrepairandinternalbraceaugmentationincomparisontoaclreconstructionandhealthycontrolsexperimentalprotocolofanonrandomisedsinglecentrecomparativestudy |