Cargando…

Generic analysis method to learn from serious adverse events in Dutch hospitals: a human factors perspective

BACKGROUND: Hospitals in various countries such as the Netherlands investigate and analyse serious adverse events (SAEs) to learn from previous events and attempt to prevent recurrence. However, current methods for SAE analysis do not address the complexity of healthcare and investigations typically...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baartmans, Mees Casper, Van Schoten, Steffie Marijke, Wagner, Cordula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001637
_version_ 1784643888780148736
author Baartmans, Mees Casper
Van Schoten, Steffie Marijke
Wagner, Cordula
author_facet Baartmans, Mees Casper
Van Schoten, Steffie Marijke
Wagner, Cordula
author_sort Baartmans, Mees Casper
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospitals in various countries such as the Netherlands investigate and analyse serious adverse events (SAEs) to learn from previous events and attempt to prevent recurrence. However, current methods for SAE analysis do not address the complexity of healthcare and investigations typically focus on single events on the hospital level. This hampers hospitals in their ambition to learn from SAEs. Integrating human factors thinking and using a holistic and more consistent method could improve learning from SAEs. AIM: This study aims to develop a novel generic analysis method (GAM) to: (1) facilitate a holistic event analysis using a human factors perspective and (2) ease aggregate analysis of events across hospitals. METHODS: Multiple steps of carefully evaluating, testing and continuously refining prototypes of the method were performed. Various Dutch stakeholders in the field of patient safety were involved in each step. Theoretical experts were consulted, and the prototype was pretested using information-rich SAE reports from Dutch hospitals. Expert panels, engaging quality and safety experts and medical specialists from various hospitals were consulted for face and content validity evaluation. User test sessions concluded the development of the method. RESULTS: The final version of the GAM consists of a framework and affiliated questionnaire. GAM combines elements of three methods for SAE analysis currently practised by Dutch hospitals. It is structured according to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model, which incorporates a human factors perspective into the analysis. These eases aggregated analysis of SAEs across hospitals and helps to consider the complexity of healthcare work systems. CONCLUSION: The GAM is a valuable new tool for hospitals to learn from SAEs. The method can facilitate a holistic aggregate analysis of SAEs across hospitals using a human factors perspective, and is now ready for further extensive testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8808443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88084432022-02-09 Generic analysis method to learn from serious adverse events in Dutch hospitals: a human factors perspective Baartmans, Mees Casper Van Schoten, Steffie Marijke Wagner, Cordula BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: Hospitals in various countries such as the Netherlands investigate and analyse serious adverse events (SAEs) to learn from previous events and attempt to prevent recurrence. However, current methods for SAE analysis do not address the complexity of healthcare and investigations typically focus on single events on the hospital level. This hampers hospitals in their ambition to learn from SAEs. Integrating human factors thinking and using a holistic and more consistent method could improve learning from SAEs. AIM: This study aims to develop a novel generic analysis method (GAM) to: (1) facilitate a holistic event analysis using a human factors perspective and (2) ease aggregate analysis of events across hospitals. METHODS: Multiple steps of carefully evaluating, testing and continuously refining prototypes of the method were performed. Various Dutch stakeholders in the field of patient safety were involved in each step. Theoretical experts were consulted, and the prototype was pretested using information-rich SAE reports from Dutch hospitals. Expert panels, engaging quality and safety experts and medical specialists from various hospitals were consulted for face and content validity evaluation. User test sessions concluded the development of the method. RESULTS: The final version of the GAM consists of a framework and affiliated questionnaire. GAM combines elements of three methods for SAE analysis currently practised by Dutch hospitals. It is structured according to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model, which incorporates a human factors perspective into the analysis. These eases aggregated analysis of SAEs across hospitals and helps to consider the complexity of healthcare work systems. CONCLUSION: The GAM is a valuable new tool for hospitals to learn from SAEs. The method can facilitate a holistic aggregate analysis of SAEs across hospitals using a human factors perspective, and is now ready for further extensive testing. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8808443/ /pubmed/35105550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001637 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Baartmans, Mees Casper
Van Schoten, Steffie Marijke
Wagner, Cordula
Generic analysis method to learn from serious adverse events in Dutch hospitals: a human factors perspective
title Generic analysis method to learn from serious adverse events in Dutch hospitals: a human factors perspective
title_full Generic analysis method to learn from serious adverse events in Dutch hospitals: a human factors perspective
title_fullStr Generic analysis method to learn from serious adverse events in Dutch hospitals: a human factors perspective
title_full_unstemmed Generic analysis method to learn from serious adverse events in Dutch hospitals: a human factors perspective
title_short Generic analysis method to learn from serious adverse events in Dutch hospitals: a human factors perspective
title_sort generic analysis method to learn from serious adverse events in dutch hospitals: a human factors perspective
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001637
work_keys_str_mv AT baartmansmeescasper genericanalysismethodtolearnfromseriousadverseeventsindutchhospitalsahumanfactorsperspective
AT vanschotensteffiemarijke genericanalysismethodtolearnfromseriousadverseeventsindutchhospitalsahumanfactorsperspective
AT wagnercordula genericanalysismethodtolearnfromseriousadverseeventsindutchhospitalsahumanfactorsperspective