Cargando…

Development of support material for health professionals who are implementing Shared Decision-making in breast cancer screening: validation using the Delphi technique

BACKGROUND: The Literature is no report support material on Shared Decision-making applied to breast cancer screening that is intended for Spanish health professionals. The researcher created both a handbook and a guide for this topic using an adaption of the Three-talk model. OBJECTIVE: A Delphi me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hernández-Leal, María José, Codern-Bové, Núria, Pérez-Lacasta, María José, Cardona, Angels, Vidal-Lancis, Carmen, Carles-Lavila, Misericòrdia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052566
_version_ 1784643891802144768
author Hernández-Leal, María José
Codern-Bové, Núria
Pérez-Lacasta, María José
Cardona, Angels
Vidal-Lancis, Carmen
Carles-Lavila, Misericòrdia
author_facet Hernández-Leal, María José
Codern-Bové, Núria
Pérez-Lacasta, María José
Cardona, Angels
Vidal-Lancis, Carmen
Carles-Lavila, Misericòrdia
author_sort Hernández-Leal, María José
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Literature is no report support material on Shared Decision-making applied to breast cancer screening that is intended for Spanish health professionals. The researcher created both a handbook and a guide for this topic using an adaption of the Three-talk model. OBJECTIVE: A Delphi method will be used to reach an agreement among experts on the contents and design of a manual and guide, designed by the research team, and to be used by health professionals in the application of SDM in breast cancer screening. DESIGN: A qualitative study. The content and design of the handbook and the guide was discussed by 20 experts. The Delphi techniques was in an online mode between July and October 2020 and researchers used Google forms in three rounds with open and closed questions. The criterion established for consensus was a coefficient of concordance (Cc) above 75, for questions using a Likert scale of 1–6—in which 1 meant ‘completely disagree’ and 6 ‘completely agree’—with a cut-off point equal to or higher than 4. RESULTS: Participants considered the Three-talk model suitable for the screening context. The handbook sections and level of detail were considered satisfactory (Cc=90). The summary provided by the clinical practice guide was considered necessary (Cc=75), as it was the self-assessment tool for professionals (Cc=85). Content was added: addressing the limitations of the SDM model; extending the number of sample dialogues for health professionals; providing supplementary resources on using Patient Decisions aids and adding references on communication skills. CONCLUSIONS AND APPLICATIONS: The first handbook and clinical practice guide providing unique SDM support material for health professionals have been developed. The handbook and guide are useful and innovative as supporting material for health professionals, but training strategies for SDM and a piloting plan for the use of materials are requested, in order to facilitate its implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8808455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88084552022-02-09 Development of support material for health professionals who are implementing Shared Decision-making in breast cancer screening: validation using the Delphi technique Hernández-Leal, María José Codern-Bové, Núria Pérez-Lacasta, María José Cardona, Angels Vidal-Lancis, Carmen Carles-Lavila, Misericòrdia BMJ Open Medical Education and Training BACKGROUND: The Literature is no report support material on Shared Decision-making applied to breast cancer screening that is intended for Spanish health professionals. The researcher created both a handbook and a guide for this topic using an adaption of the Three-talk model. OBJECTIVE: A Delphi method will be used to reach an agreement among experts on the contents and design of a manual and guide, designed by the research team, and to be used by health professionals in the application of SDM in breast cancer screening. DESIGN: A qualitative study. The content and design of the handbook and the guide was discussed by 20 experts. The Delphi techniques was in an online mode between July and October 2020 and researchers used Google forms in three rounds with open and closed questions. The criterion established for consensus was a coefficient of concordance (Cc) above 75, for questions using a Likert scale of 1–6—in which 1 meant ‘completely disagree’ and 6 ‘completely agree’—with a cut-off point equal to or higher than 4. RESULTS: Participants considered the Three-talk model suitable for the screening context. The handbook sections and level of detail were considered satisfactory (Cc=90). The summary provided by the clinical practice guide was considered necessary (Cc=75), as it was the self-assessment tool for professionals (Cc=85). Content was added: addressing the limitations of the SDM model; extending the number of sample dialogues for health professionals; providing supplementary resources on using Patient Decisions aids and adding references on communication skills. CONCLUSIONS AND APPLICATIONS: The first handbook and clinical practice guide providing unique SDM support material for health professionals have been developed. The handbook and guide are useful and innovative as supporting material for health professionals, but training strategies for SDM and a piloting plan for the use of materials are requested, in order to facilitate its implementation. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8808455/ /pubmed/35105575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052566 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Hernández-Leal, María José
Codern-Bové, Núria
Pérez-Lacasta, María José
Cardona, Angels
Vidal-Lancis, Carmen
Carles-Lavila, Misericòrdia
Development of support material for health professionals who are implementing Shared Decision-making in breast cancer screening: validation using the Delphi technique
title Development of support material for health professionals who are implementing Shared Decision-making in breast cancer screening: validation using the Delphi technique
title_full Development of support material for health professionals who are implementing Shared Decision-making in breast cancer screening: validation using the Delphi technique
title_fullStr Development of support material for health professionals who are implementing Shared Decision-making in breast cancer screening: validation using the Delphi technique
title_full_unstemmed Development of support material for health professionals who are implementing Shared Decision-making in breast cancer screening: validation using the Delphi technique
title_short Development of support material for health professionals who are implementing Shared Decision-making in breast cancer screening: validation using the Delphi technique
title_sort development of support material for health professionals who are implementing shared decision-making in breast cancer screening: validation using the delphi technique
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052566
work_keys_str_mv AT hernandezlealmariajose developmentofsupportmaterialforhealthprofessionalswhoareimplementingshareddecisionmakinginbreastcancerscreeningvalidationusingthedelphitechnique
AT codernbovenuria developmentofsupportmaterialforhealthprofessionalswhoareimplementingshareddecisionmakinginbreastcancerscreeningvalidationusingthedelphitechnique
AT perezlacastamariajose developmentofsupportmaterialforhealthprofessionalswhoareimplementingshareddecisionmakinginbreastcancerscreeningvalidationusingthedelphitechnique
AT cardonaangels developmentofsupportmaterialforhealthprofessionalswhoareimplementingshareddecisionmakinginbreastcancerscreeningvalidationusingthedelphitechnique
AT vidallanciscarmen developmentofsupportmaterialforhealthprofessionalswhoareimplementingshareddecisionmakinginbreastcancerscreeningvalidationusingthedelphitechnique
AT carleslavilamisericordia developmentofsupportmaterialforhealthprofessionalswhoareimplementingshareddecisionmakinginbreastcancerscreeningvalidationusingthedelphitechnique
AT developmentofsupportmaterialforhealthprofessionalswhoareimplementingshareddecisionmakinginbreastcancerscreeningvalidationusingthedelphitechnique