Cargando…

Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing safety and efficacy of the biosimilar BCD-021 with reference bevacizumab

BACKGROUND: BCD-021 is a bevacizumab biosimilar which was shown to be equivalent to reference bevacizumab in a wide panel of physicochemical studies as well as preclinical studies in vitro and in vivo. International multicenter phase III clinical trial was conducted to compare efficacy and safety of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stroyakovskiy, Daniil L., Fadeeva, Natalya V., Matrosova, Marina P., Shelepen, Konstantin G., Adamchuk, Grigoriy A., Roy, Bodhisatta, Nagarkar, Rajnish, Kalloli, Mahesh, Zhuravleva, Daria, Voevodin, Georgiy D., Shustova, Mariya S., Kryukov, Fedor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09243-7
_version_ 1784643929462800384
author Stroyakovskiy, Daniil L.
Fadeeva, Natalya V.
Matrosova, Marina P.
Shelepen, Konstantin G.
Adamchuk, Grigoriy A.
Roy, Bodhisatta
Nagarkar, Rajnish
Kalloli, Mahesh
Zhuravleva, Daria
Voevodin, Georgiy D.
Shustova, Mariya S.
Kryukov, Fedor
author_facet Stroyakovskiy, Daniil L.
Fadeeva, Natalya V.
Matrosova, Marina P.
Shelepen, Konstantin G.
Adamchuk, Grigoriy A.
Roy, Bodhisatta
Nagarkar, Rajnish
Kalloli, Mahesh
Zhuravleva, Daria
Voevodin, Georgiy D.
Shustova, Mariya S.
Kryukov, Fedor
author_sort Stroyakovskiy, Daniil L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: BCD-021 is a bevacizumab biosimilar which was shown to be equivalent to reference bevacizumab in a wide panel of physicochemical studies as well as preclinical studies in vitro and in vivo. International multicenter phase III clinical trial was conducted to compare efficacy and safety of BCD-021 and reference bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in a first-line treatment of inoperable or advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with no previous treatment for advanced non-squamous NSCLC were randomly assigned 3:2 to BCD-021 or reference bevacizumab and were treated with bevacizumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin. Therapy continued for 6 cycles (every 3 weeks), until progression of the disease or unbearable toxicity. The primary study endpoint was the overall response rate. The study goal was to prove the equivalent efficacy of BCD-021 and reference bevacizumab. Equivalence margins for 95% CI for the difference in the overall response rates were set at [-18%; 18%], for 90% CI for the ratio of overall response rate were set at [67%; 150%]. RESULTS: In total 357 patients were enrolled in the study, 212 in the BCD-021 group and 145 in the reference bevacizumab group. The ORR was 34.63% in the BCD-022 group and 33.82% in the reference bevacizumab group. Limits of 95% CI for the difference in overall response rates between the groups were [-9.47%; 11.09%]. Limits of 90% CI for the ratio of overall response rate between the groups were [79.6%; 131.73%]. For both approaches CI lied within predetermined equivalence margins. Profile of adverse events (AEs) was similar between the groups (any AEs were reported in 86.89% of patients in BCD-021 group and 89.05% of patients in reference group). No unexpected adverse reactions were reported throughout the study. No statistically significant differences regarding anti-drug antibody occurrence rate was found between BCD-022 (n=4; 1.96%) and comparator (n=5; 3.65%). Both drug products showed low occurrence rate and short life of anti-bevacizumab antibodies. Pharmacokinetics assessment after 1(st) and 6(th) study drug injection also demonstrated equivalent PK parameters by all outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the results of this study demonstrated therapeutic equivalence of bevacizumab biosimilar BCD-021 and referent bevacizumab drug. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Study Number NCT01763645, date of registration 09/01/2013). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09243-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8808992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88089922022-02-03 Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing safety and efficacy of the biosimilar BCD-021 with reference bevacizumab Stroyakovskiy, Daniil L. Fadeeva, Natalya V. Matrosova, Marina P. Shelepen, Konstantin G. Adamchuk, Grigoriy A. Roy, Bodhisatta Nagarkar, Rajnish Kalloli, Mahesh Zhuravleva, Daria Voevodin, Georgiy D. Shustova, Mariya S. Kryukov, Fedor BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: BCD-021 is a bevacizumab biosimilar which was shown to be equivalent to reference bevacizumab in a wide panel of physicochemical studies as well as preclinical studies in vitro and in vivo. International multicenter phase III clinical trial was conducted to compare efficacy and safety of BCD-021 and reference bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in a first-line treatment of inoperable or advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with no previous treatment for advanced non-squamous NSCLC were randomly assigned 3:2 to BCD-021 or reference bevacizumab and were treated with bevacizumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin. Therapy continued for 6 cycles (every 3 weeks), until progression of the disease or unbearable toxicity. The primary study endpoint was the overall response rate. The study goal was to prove the equivalent efficacy of BCD-021 and reference bevacizumab. Equivalence margins for 95% CI for the difference in the overall response rates were set at [-18%; 18%], for 90% CI for the ratio of overall response rate were set at [67%; 150%]. RESULTS: In total 357 patients were enrolled in the study, 212 in the BCD-021 group and 145 in the reference bevacizumab group. The ORR was 34.63% in the BCD-022 group and 33.82% in the reference bevacizumab group. Limits of 95% CI for the difference in overall response rates between the groups were [-9.47%; 11.09%]. Limits of 90% CI for the ratio of overall response rate between the groups were [79.6%; 131.73%]. For both approaches CI lied within predetermined equivalence margins. Profile of adverse events (AEs) was similar between the groups (any AEs were reported in 86.89% of patients in BCD-021 group and 89.05% of patients in reference group). No unexpected adverse reactions were reported throughout the study. No statistically significant differences regarding anti-drug antibody occurrence rate was found between BCD-022 (n=4; 1.96%) and comparator (n=5; 3.65%). Both drug products showed low occurrence rate and short life of anti-bevacizumab antibodies. Pharmacokinetics assessment after 1(st) and 6(th) study drug injection also demonstrated equivalent PK parameters by all outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the results of this study demonstrated therapeutic equivalence of bevacizumab biosimilar BCD-021 and referent bevacizumab drug. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Study Number NCT01763645, date of registration 09/01/2013). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09243-7. BioMed Central 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8808992/ /pubmed/35105329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09243-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Stroyakovskiy, Daniil L.
Fadeeva, Natalya V.
Matrosova, Marina P.
Shelepen, Konstantin G.
Adamchuk, Grigoriy A.
Roy, Bodhisatta
Nagarkar, Rajnish
Kalloli, Mahesh
Zhuravleva, Daria
Voevodin, Georgiy D.
Shustova, Mariya S.
Kryukov, Fedor
Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing safety and efficacy of the biosimilar BCD-021 with reference bevacizumab
title Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing safety and efficacy of the biosimilar BCD-021 with reference bevacizumab
title_full Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing safety and efficacy of the biosimilar BCD-021 with reference bevacizumab
title_fullStr Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing safety and efficacy of the biosimilar BCD-021 with reference bevacizumab
title_full_unstemmed Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing safety and efficacy of the biosimilar BCD-021 with reference bevacizumab
title_short Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing safety and efficacy of the biosimilar BCD-021 with reference bevacizumab
title_sort randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing safety and efficacy of the biosimilar bcd-021 with reference bevacizumab
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8808992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09243-7
work_keys_str_mv AT stroyakovskiydaniill randomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialcomparingsafetyandefficacyofthebiosimilarbcd021withreferencebevacizumab
AT fadeevanatalyav randomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialcomparingsafetyandefficacyofthebiosimilarbcd021withreferencebevacizumab
AT matrosovamarinap randomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialcomparingsafetyandefficacyofthebiosimilarbcd021withreferencebevacizumab
AT shelepenkonstanting randomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialcomparingsafetyandefficacyofthebiosimilarbcd021withreferencebevacizumab
AT adamchukgrigoriya randomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialcomparingsafetyandefficacyofthebiosimilarbcd021withreferencebevacizumab
AT roybodhisatta randomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialcomparingsafetyandefficacyofthebiosimilarbcd021withreferencebevacizumab
AT nagarkarrajnish randomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialcomparingsafetyandefficacyofthebiosimilarbcd021withreferencebevacizumab
AT kallolimahesh randomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialcomparingsafetyandefficacyofthebiosimilarbcd021withreferencebevacizumab
AT zhuravlevadaria randomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialcomparingsafetyandefficacyofthebiosimilarbcd021withreferencebevacizumab
AT voevodingeorgiyd randomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialcomparingsafetyandefficacyofthebiosimilarbcd021withreferencebevacizumab
AT shustovamariyas randomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialcomparingsafetyandefficacyofthebiosimilarbcd021withreferencebevacizumab
AT kryukovfedor randomizeddoubleblindclinicaltrialcomparingsafetyandefficacyofthebiosimilarbcd021withreferencebevacizumab