Cargando…

The effect of shared decision-making on recovery from non-chronic aspecific low back pain in primary care; a post-hoc analysis from the patient, physician and observer perspectives

BACKGROUND: Although shared decision-making (SDM) is increasingly accepted in healthcare and has demonstrated merits for several psychological outcomes, the effect on recovery from somatic conditions is still subject to debate. The objective of this study is to measure the effect of SDM on recovery...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanders, Ariëtte R. J., de Wit, Niek J., Zuithoff, Nicolaas P. A., van Dulmen, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8809011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01624-y
_version_ 1784643933242916864
author Sanders, Ariëtte R. J.
de Wit, Niek J.
Zuithoff, Nicolaas P. A.
van Dulmen, Sandra
author_facet Sanders, Ariëtte R. J.
de Wit, Niek J.
Zuithoff, Nicolaas P. A.
van Dulmen, Sandra
author_sort Sanders, Ariëtte R. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although shared decision-making (SDM) is increasingly accepted in healthcare and has demonstrated merits for several psychological outcomes, the effect on recovery from somatic conditions is still subject to debate. The objective of this study is to measure the effect of SDM on recovery from non-chronic aspecific low back pain (LBP). METHODS: This study is a post-hoc analysis of data from a cluster-randomised trial that evaluated the effectiveness of SDM on recovery in patients with non-chronic aspecific LBP. In this analysis, we re-evaluate the impact of SDM from three perspectives: that of external observers, participating GPs and participating patients. Recovery was measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and with the Roland Morris Disability questionnaire (RMD) and defined as a VAS < 30 and an RMD < 4. Logistic regression was used to analyse the effect of SDM on recovery at 6 and 26 weeks. RESULTS: At 26 weeks, 105 (74%) of all 176 included patients had recovered. No significant effect of SDM on recovery at 6 or 26 weeks after the consultation was found when considering SDM from an observer perspective or a patient perspective. From a GP perspective SDM had a significant effect on recovery, but at 26 weeks only, and with the lowest probability of recovery observed at a medium level of GP-perceived SDM. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that SDM as perceived by the patient or by external observation improves recovery from non-chronic aspecific low back pain. The long-term recovery may be better for patients in whom the GP perceives SDM during their consultations. Further research should highlight the hierarchy and the relation between the perspectives, which is needed to come to an integral effect evaluation of SDM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR) number: NTR1960. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01624-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8809011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88090112022-02-03 The effect of shared decision-making on recovery from non-chronic aspecific low back pain in primary care; a post-hoc analysis from the patient, physician and observer perspectives Sanders, Ariëtte R. J. de Wit, Niek J. Zuithoff, Nicolaas P. A. van Dulmen, Sandra BMC Prim Care Research BACKGROUND: Although shared decision-making (SDM) is increasingly accepted in healthcare and has demonstrated merits for several psychological outcomes, the effect on recovery from somatic conditions is still subject to debate. The objective of this study is to measure the effect of SDM on recovery from non-chronic aspecific low back pain (LBP). METHODS: This study is a post-hoc analysis of data from a cluster-randomised trial that evaluated the effectiveness of SDM on recovery in patients with non-chronic aspecific LBP. In this analysis, we re-evaluate the impact of SDM from three perspectives: that of external observers, participating GPs and participating patients. Recovery was measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and with the Roland Morris Disability questionnaire (RMD) and defined as a VAS < 30 and an RMD < 4. Logistic regression was used to analyse the effect of SDM on recovery at 6 and 26 weeks. RESULTS: At 26 weeks, 105 (74%) of all 176 included patients had recovered. No significant effect of SDM on recovery at 6 or 26 weeks after the consultation was found when considering SDM from an observer perspective or a patient perspective. From a GP perspective SDM had a significant effect on recovery, but at 26 weeks only, and with the lowest probability of recovery observed at a medium level of GP-perceived SDM. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that SDM as perceived by the patient or by external observation improves recovery from non-chronic aspecific low back pain. The long-term recovery may be better for patients in whom the GP perceives SDM during their consultations. Further research should highlight the hierarchy and the relation between the perspectives, which is needed to come to an integral effect evaluation of SDM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR) number: NTR1960. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01624-y. BioMed Central 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8809011/ /pubmed/35172742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01624-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sanders, Ariëtte R. J.
de Wit, Niek J.
Zuithoff, Nicolaas P. A.
van Dulmen, Sandra
The effect of shared decision-making on recovery from non-chronic aspecific low back pain in primary care; a post-hoc analysis from the patient, physician and observer perspectives
title The effect of shared decision-making on recovery from non-chronic aspecific low back pain in primary care; a post-hoc analysis from the patient, physician and observer perspectives
title_full The effect of shared decision-making on recovery from non-chronic aspecific low back pain in primary care; a post-hoc analysis from the patient, physician and observer perspectives
title_fullStr The effect of shared decision-making on recovery from non-chronic aspecific low back pain in primary care; a post-hoc analysis from the patient, physician and observer perspectives
title_full_unstemmed The effect of shared decision-making on recovery from non-chronic aspecific low back pain in primary care; a post-hoc analysis from the patient, physician and observer perspectives
title_short The effect of shared decision-making on recovery from non-chronic aspecific low back pain in primary care; a post-hoc analysis from the patient, physician and observer perspectives
title_sort effect of shared decision-making on recovery from non-chronic aspecific low back pain in primary care; a post-hoc analysis from the patient, physician and observer perspectives
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8809011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01624-y
work_keys_str_mv AT sandersarietterj theeffectofshareddecisionmakingonrecoveryfromnonchronicaspecificlowbackpaininprimarycareaposthocanalysisfromthepatientphysicianandobserverperspectives
AT dewitniekj theeffectofshareddecisionmakingonrecoveryfromnonchronicaspecificlowbackpaininprimarycareaposthocanalysisfromthepatientphysicianandobserverperspectives
AT zuithoffnicolaaspa theeffectofshareddecisionmakingonrecoveryfromnonchronicaspecificlowbackpaininprimarycareaposthocanalysisfromthepatientphysicianandobserverperspectives
AT vandulmensandra theeffectofshareddecisionmakingonrecoveryfromnonchronicaspecificlowbackpaininprimarycareaposthocanalysisfromthepatientphysicianandobserverperspectives
AT sandersarietterj effectofshareddecisionmakingonrecoveryfromnonchronicaspecificlowbackpaininprimarycareaposthocanalysisfromthepatientphysicianandobserverperspectives
AT dewitniekj effectofshareddecisionmakingonrecoveryfromnonchronicaspecificlowbackpaininprimarycareaposthocanalysisfromthepatientphysicianandobserverperspectives
AT zuithoffnicolaaspa effectofshareddecisionmakingonrecoveryfromnonchronicaspecificlowbackpaininprimarycareaposthocanalysisfromthepatientphysicianandobserverperspectives
AT vandulmensandra effectofshareddecisionmakingonrecoveryfromnonchronicaspecificlowbackpaininprimarycareaposthocanalysisfromthepatientphysicianandobserverperspectives