Cargando…

Cochrane's risk of bias tool for non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) is frequently misapplied: A methodological systematic review

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to review how ‘Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies–of Interventions’ (ROBINS-I), a Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, has been used in recent systematic reviews. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Database and citation searches were conducted in March 2020 to identify recently pub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Igelström, Erik, Campbell, Mhairi, Craig, Peter, Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Elsevier 2021
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8809341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34437948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.022

Ejemplares similares

Applying the ROBINS-I tool to natural experiments: an example from public health
por: Thomson, Hilary, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Misapplied Sympathy
Publicado: (1878)

Lack of transparency in reporting narrative synthesis of quantitative data: a methodological assessment of systematic reviews
por: Campbell, Mhairi, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

How do systematic reviews incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis of evidence? A methodological study
por: Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Causal inference and effect estimation using observational data
por: Igelström, Erik, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Making the most of natural experiments: What can studies of the withdrawal of public health interventions offer?
por: Craig, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

TIDieR-PHP: a reporting guideline for population health and policy interventions
por: Campbell, Mhairi, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
por: Sterne, Jonathan AC, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

On the identity of Leptoxis taeniata – a misapplied name for the threatened Painted Rocksnail (Cerithioidea, Pleuroceridae)
por: Whelan, Nathan V., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Causal assessment in evidence synthesis: A methodological review of reviews
por: Shimonovich, Michal, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
por: Jørgensen, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Improving Conduct and Reporting of Narrative Synthesis of Quantitative Data (ICONS-Quant): protocol for a mixed methods study to develop a reporting guideline
por: Campbell, Mhairi, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
por: Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
por: Higgins, Julian P T, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Methodological Bias Can Lead the Cochrane Collaboration to Irrelevance in Public Health Decision-Making
por: Montresor, Antonio, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Investigating the salmon bias effect among international immigrants in Sweden: a register-based open cohort study
por: Dunlavy, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Poor Reliability between Cochrane Reviewers and Blinded External Reviewers When Applying the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool in Physical Therapy Trials
por: Armijo-Olivo, Susan, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

It Takes Two: The Round-Robin Methodology for Investigative Interviewing Research
por: Hudson, Charlotte A., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Natural Experiments: An Overview of Methods, Approaches, and Contributions to Public Health Intervention Research
por: Craig, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a study protocol
por: da Costa, Bruno R, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a prospective study
por: da Costa, Bruno R., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

How did policy actors use mass media to influence the Scottish alcohol minimum unit pricing debate? Comparative analysis of newspapers, evidence submissions and interviews
por: Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Characteristics of good supervision: a multi-perspective qualitative exploration of the Masters in Public Health dissertation
por: Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Urban-rural inequalities in suicide among elderly people in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Li, Meizhi, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

More inclusive research is needed for an equitable response to dementia
por: Amele, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews
por: Zhu, Linlin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The health impact of Scotland's Baby Box Scheme: a natural experiment evaluation using national linked health data
por: McCabe, Ronan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Mental health and the jilted generation: Using age-period-cohort analysis to assess differential trends in young people's mental health following the Great Recession and austerity in England
por: Thomson, Rachel M., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Improving the health of trans people: the need for good data
por: Thomson, Rachel M, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The inverse care law in critical care during the COVID-19 pandemic
por: Hainey, Kirsten J, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies
por: Lundh, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Considerations from the risk of bias perspective for updating Cochrane reviews
por: Mayhew, Alain D., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures
por: Bero, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data
por: Anyanwu, Philip Emeka, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Impact of UK Tobacco Control Policies on Inequalities in Youth Smoking Uptake: A Natural Experiment Study
por: Anyanwu, Philip Emeka, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation
por: Savović, Jelena, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Changing Policy Framing as a Deliberate Strategy for Public Health Advocacy: A Qualitative Policy Case Study of Minimum Unit Pricing of Alcohol
por: Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_vnn8p3ghpc0s2gfnnnt8cormc2