Cargando…
Cattle grazing results in greater floral resources and pollinators than sheep grazing in low‐diversity grasslands
1. Land‐use and land‐cover change associated with agriculture is one of the main drivers of biodiversity loss. In heavily modified agricultural landscapes, grazing lands may be the only areas that can provide essential resources for native grassland species. Management decisions, such as choice of l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8809440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35136542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8396 |
_version_ | 1784644016978001920 |
---|---|
author | Cutter, Jasmine Hovick, Torre McGranahan, Devan Harmon, Jason Limb, Ryan Spiess, Jonathan Geaumont, Benjamin |
author_facet | Cutter, Jasmine Hovick, Torre McGranahan, Devan Harmon, Jason Limb, Ryan Spiess, Jonathan Geaumont, Benjamin |
author_sort | Cutter, Jasmine |
collection | PubMed |
description | 1. Land‐use and land‐cover change associated with agriculture is one of the main drivers of biodiversity loss. In heavily modified agricultural landscapes, grazing lands may be the only areas that can provide essential resources for native grassland species. Management decisions, such as choice of livestock species, affect the extent to which grazing lands provide suitable habitat for native species such as pollinators. 2. Our study compared how sheep versus cattle herbivory affected floral resources and butterfly abundance across low‐diversity, former Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) pastures managed with patch‐burn grazing. 3. Across all years (2017–2019), flowering species richness and abundance were significantly higher in cattle pastures than sheep pastures. On average, we recorded 6.9 flowering species/transect in cattle pastures and 3.8 flowering species/transect in sheep pastures. The average floral abundance per transect was 1278 stems/transect in cattle pastures and 116 stems/transect in pastures grazed by sheep. 4. Similarly, we observed higher butterfly species richness, diversity, and abundance in cattle than in sheep pastures. In cattle pastures, we observed an average of 75 butterflies and 6.75 species per transect, compared with an average of 52 butterflies and 3.37 species per transect in sheep pastures. However, the butterfly community composition did not significantly differ between grazing treatments likely because agricultural‐tolerant, habitat generalists comprised the majority of the butterfly community. Five generalist butterflies comprised 92.3% of observations; Colias philodice was the most abundant (61% of observations). Speyeria idalia and Danaus plexippus, two butterflies of conservation concern, comprised less than 0.5% of butterfly observations. 5. Our results, which are among the first attempt quantifying butterfly use of post‐CRP fields grazed by livestock, show that increased precipitation and cattle grazing promoted higher forb abundance and richness. However, additional interventions may be needed to enhance floral resources to sustain and improve pollinator diversity in these landscapes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8809440 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88094402022-02-07 Cattle grazing results in greater floral resources and pollinators than sheep grazing in low‐diversity grasslands Cutter, Jasmine Hovick, Torre McGranahan, Devan Harmon, Jason Limb, Ryan Spiess, Jonathan Geaumont, Benjamin Ecol Evol Research Articles 1. Land‐use and land‐cover change associated with agriculture is one of the main drivers of biodiversity loss. In heavily modified agricultural landscapes, grazing lands may be the only areas that can provide essential resources for native grassland species. Management decisions, such as choice of livestock species, affect the extent to which grazing lands provide suitable habitat for native species such as pollinators. 2. Our study compared how sheep versus cattle herbivory affected floral resources and butterfly abundance across low‐diversity, former Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) pastures managed with patch‐burn grazing. 3. Across all years (2017–2019), flowering species richness and abundance were significantly higher in cattle pastures than sheep pastures. On average, we recorded 6.9 flowering species/transect in cattle pastures and 3.8 flowering species/transect in sheep pastures. The average floral abundance per transect was 1278 stems/transect in cattle pastures and 116 stems/transect in pastures grazed by sheep. 4. Similarly, we observed higher butterfly species richness, diversity, and abundance in cattle than in sheep pastures. In cattle pastures, we observed an average of 75 butterflies and 6.75 species per transect, compared with an average of 52 butterflies and 3.37 species per transect in sheep pastures. However, the butterfly community composition did not significantly differ between grazing treatments likely because agricultural‐tolerant, habitat generalists comprised the majority of the butterfly community. Five generalist butterflies comprised 92.3% of observations; Colias philodice was the most abundant (61% of observations). Speyeria idalia and Danaus plexippus, two butterflies of conservation concern, comprised less than 0.5% of butterfly observations. 5. Our results, which are among the first attempt quantifying butterfly use of post‐CRP fields grazed by livestock, show that increased precipitation and cattle grazing promoted higher forb abundance and richness. However, additional interventions may be needed to enhance floral resources to sustain and improve pollinator diversity in these landscapes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8809440/ /pubmed/35136542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8396 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Cutter, Jasmine Hovick, Torre McGranahan, Devan Harmon, Jason Limb, Ryan Spiess, Jonathan Geaumont, Benjamin Cattle grazing results in greater floral resources and pollinators than sheep grazing in low‐diversity grasslands |
title | Cattle grazing results in greater floral resources and pollinators than sheep grazing in low‐diversity grasslands |
title_full | Cattle grazing results in greater floral resources and pollinators than sheep grazing in low‐diversity grasslands |
title_fullStr | Cattle grazing results in greater floral resources and pollinators than sheep grazing in low‐diversity grasslands |
title_full_unstemmed | Cattle grazing results in greater floral resources and pollinators than sheep grazing in low‐diversity grasslands |
title_short | Cattle grazing results in greater floral resources and pollinators than sheep grazing in low‐diversity grasslands |
title_sort | cattle grazing results in greater floral resources and pollinators than sheep grazing in low‐diversity grasslands |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8809440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35136542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8396 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cutterjasmine cattlegrazingresultsingreaterfloralresourcesandpollinatorsthansheepgrazinginlowdiversitygrasslands AT hovicktorre cattlegrazingresultsingreaterfloralresourcesandpollinatorsthansheepgrazinginlowdiversitygrasslands AT mcgranahandevan cattlegrazingresultsingreaterfloralresourcesandpollinatorsthansheepgrazinginlowdiversitygrasslands AT harmonjason cattlegrazingresultsingreaterfloralresourcesandpollinatorsthansheepgrazinginlowdiversitygrasslands AT limbryan cattlegrazingresultsingreaterfloralresourcesandpollinatorsthansheepgrazinginlowdiversitygrasslands AT spiessjonathan cattlegrazingresultsingreaterfloralresourcesandpollinatorsthansheepgrazinginlowdiversitygrasslands AT geaumontbenjamin cattlegrazingresultsingreaterfloralresourcesandpollinatorsthansheepgrazinginlowdiversitygrasslands |