Cargando…

Cattle grazing results in greater floral resources and pollinators than sheep grazing in low‐diversity grasslands

1. Land‐use and land‐cover change associated with agriculture is one of the main drivers of biodiversity loss. In heavily modified agricultural landscapes, grazing lands may be the only areas that can provide essential resources for native grassland species. Management decisions, such as choice of l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cutter, Jasmine, Hovick, Torre, McGranahan, Devan, Harmon, Jason, Limb, Ryan, Spiess, Jonathan, Geaumont, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8809440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35136542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8396
_version_ 1784644016978001920
author Cutter, Jasmine
Hovick, Torre
McGranahan, Devan
Harmon, Jason
Limb, Ryan
Spiess, Jonathan
Geaumont, Benjamin
author_facet Cutter, Jasmine
Hovick, Torre
McGranahan, Devan
Harmon, Jason
Limb, Ryan
Spiess, Jonathan
Geaumont, Benjamin
author_sort Cutter, Jasmine
collection PubMed
description 1. Land‐use and land‐cover change associated with agriculture is one of the main drivers of biodiversity loss. In heavily modified agricultural landscapes, grazing lands may be the only areas that can provide essential resources for native grassland species. Management decisions, such as choice of livestock species, affect the extent to which grazing lands provide suitable habitat for native species such as pollinators. 2. Our study compared how sheep versus cattle herbivory affected floral resources and butterfly abundance across low‐diversity, former Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) pastures managed with patch‐burn grazing. 3. Across all years (2017–2019), flowering species richness and abundance were significantly higher in cattle pastures than sheep pastures. On average, we recorded 6.9 flowering species/transect in cattle pastures and 3.8 flowering species/transect in sheep pastures. The average floral abundance per transect was 1278 stems/transect in cattle pastures and 116 stems/transect in pastures grazed by sheep. 4. Similarly, we observed higher butterfly species richness, diversity, and abundance in cattle than in sheep pastures. In cattle pastures, we observed an average of 75 butterflies and 6.75 species per transect, compared with an average of 52 butterflies and 3.37 species per transect in sheep pastures. However, the butterfly community composition did not significantly differ between grazing treatments likely because agricultural‐tolerant, habitat generalists comprised the majority of the butterfly community. Five generalist butterflies comprised 92.3% of observations; Colias philodice was the most abundant (61% of observations). Speyeria idalia and Danaus plexippus, two butterflies of conservation concern, comprised less than 0.5% of butterfly observations. 5. Our results, which are among the first attempt quantifying butterfly use of post‐CRP fields grazed by livestock, show that increased precipitation and cattle grazing promoted higher forb abundance and richness. However, additional interventions may be needed to enhance floral resources to sustain and improve pollinator diversity in these landscapes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8809440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88094402022-02-07 Cattle grazing results in greater floral resources and pollinators than sheep grazing in low‐diversity grasslands Cutter, Jasmine Hovick, Torre McGranahan, Devan Harmon, Jason Limb, Ryan Spiess, Jonathan Geaumont, Benjamin Ecol Evol Research Articles 1. Land‐use and land‐cover change associated with agriculture is one of the main drivers of biodiversity loss. In heavily modified agricultural landscapes, grazing lands may be the only areas that can provide essential resources for native grassland species. Management decisions, such as choice of livestock species, affect the extent to which grazing lands provide suitable habitat for native species such as pollinators. 2. Our study compared how sheep versus cattle herbivory affected floral resources and butterfly abundance across low‐diversity, former Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) pastures managed with patch‐burn grazing. 3. Across all years (2017–2019), flowering species richness and abundance were significantly higher in cattle pastures than sheep pastures. On average, we recorded 6.9 flowering species/transect in cattle pastures and 3.8 flowering species/transect in sheep pastures. The average floral abundance per transect was 1278 stems/transect in cattle pastures and 116 stems/transect in pastures grazed by sheep. 4. Similarly, we observed higher butterfly species richness, diversity, and abundance in cattle than in sheep pastures. In cattle pastures, we observed an average of 75 butterflies and 6.75 species per transect, compared with an average of 52 butterflies and 3.37 species per transect in sheep pastures. However, the butterfly community composition did not significantly differ between grazing treatments likely because agricultural‐tolerant, habitat generalists comprised the majority of the butterfly community. Five generalist butterflies comprised 92.3% of observations; Colias philodice was the most abundant (61% of observations). Speyeria idalia and Danaus plexippus, two butterflies of conservation concern, comprised less than 0.5% of butterfly observations. 5. Our results, which are among the first attempt quantifying butterfly use of post‐CRP fields grazed by livestock, show that increased precipitation and cattle grazing promoted higher forb abundance and richness. However, additional interventions may be needed to enhance floral resources to sustain and improve pollinator diversity in these landscapes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8809440/ /pubmed/35136542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8396 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Cutter, Jasmine
Hovick, Torre
McGranahan, Devan
Harmon, Jason
Limb, Ryan
Spiess, Jonathan
Geaumont, Benjamin
Cattle grazing results in greater floral resources and pollinators than sheep grazing in low‐diversity grasslands
title Cattle grazing results in greater floral resources and pollinators than sheep grazing in low‐diversity grasslands
title_full Cattle grazing results in greater floral resources and pollinators than sheep grazing in low‐diversity grasslands
title_fullStr Cattle grazing results in greater floral resources and pollinators than sheep grazing in low‐diversity grasslands
title_full_unstemmed Cattle grazing results in greater floral resources and pollinators than sheep grazing in low‐diversity grasslands
title_short Cattle grazing results in greater floral resources and pollinators than sheep grazing in low‐diversity grasslands
title_sort cattle grazing results in greater floral resources and pollinators than sheep grazing in low‐diversity grasslands
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8809440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35136542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8396
work_keys_str_mv AT cutterjasmine cattlegrazingresultsingreaterfloralresourcesandpollinatorsthansheepgrazinginlowdiversitygrasslands
AT hovicktorre cattlegrazingresultsingreaterfloralresourcesandpollinatorsthansheepgrazinginlowdiversitygrasslands
AT mcgranahandevan cattlegrazingresultsingreaterfloralresourcesandpollinatorsthansheepgrazinginlowdiversitygrasslands
AT harmonjason cattlegrazingresultsingreaterfloralresourcesandpollinatorsthansheepgrazinginlowdiversitygrasslands
AT limbryan cattlegrazingresultsingreaterfloralresourcesandpollinatorsthansheepgrazinginlowdiversitygrasslands
AT spiessjonathan cattlegrazingresultsingreaterfloralresourcesandpollinatorsthansheepgrazinginlowdiversitygrasslands
AT geaumontbenjamin cattlegrazingresultsingreaterfloralresourcesandpollinatorsthansheepgrazinginlowdiversitygrasslands