Cargando…

RAVAL trial: Protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Retrospective data demonstrates that robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery provides many benefits, such as decreased postoperative pain, lower mortality, shorter length of stay, shorter chest tube duration, and reductions in the incidence of common postoperative pulmonary complications,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Yogita S., Hanna, Waël C., Fahim, Christine, Shargall, Yaron, Waddell, Thomas K., Yasufuku, Kazuhiro, Machuca, Tiago N., Pipkin, Mauricio, Baste, Jean-Marc, Xie, Feng, Shiwcharan, Andrea, Foster, Gary, Thabane, Lehana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8809527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35108265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261767
_version_ 1784644034589884416
author Patel, Yogita S.
Hanna, Waël C.
Fahim, Christine
Shargall, Yaron
Waddell, Thomas K.
Yasufuku, Kazuhiro
Machuca, Tiago N.
Pipkin, Mauricio
Baste, Jean-Marc
Xie, Feng
Shiwcharan, Andrea
Foster, Gary
Thabane, Lehana
author_facet Patel, Yogita S.
Hanna, Waël C.
Fahim, Christine
Shargall, Yaron
Waddell, Thomas K.
Yasufuku, Kazuhiro
Machuca, Tiago N.
Pipkin, Mauricio
Baste, Jean-Marc
Xie, Feng
Shiwcharan, Andrea
Foster, Gary
Thabane, Lehana
author_sort Patel, Yogita S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Retrospective data demonstrates that robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery provides many benefits, such as decreased postoperative pain, lower mortality, shorter length of stay, shorter chest tube duration, and reductions in the incidence of common postoperative pulmonary complications, when compared to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Despite the potential benefits of robotic surgery, there are two major barriers against its widespread adoption in thoracic surgery: lack of high-quality prospective data, and the perceived higher cost of it. Therefore, in the face of these barriers, a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing robotic- to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is needed. The RAVAL trial is a two-phase, international, multi-centered, blinded, parallel, randomized controlled trial that is comparing robotic- to video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer that has been enrolling patients since 2016. METHODS: The RAVAL trial will be conducted in two phases: Phase A will enroll 186 early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients who are candidates for minimally invasive pulmonary lobectomy; while Phase B will continue to recruit until 592 patients are enrolled. After consent, participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either robotic- or video-assisted lobectomy, and blinded to the type of surgery they are allocated to. Health-related quality of life questionnaires will be administered at baseline, postoperative day 1, weeks 3, 7, 12, months 6, 12, 18, 24, and years 3, 4, 5. The primary objective of the RAVAL trial is to determine the difference in patient-reported health-related quality of life outcomes between the robotic- and video-assisted lobectomy groups at 12 weeks. Secondary objectives include determining the differences in cost-effectiveness, and in the 5-year survival data between the two arms. The results of the primary objective will be reported once Phase A has completed accrual and the 12-month follow-ups are completed. The results of the secondary objectives will be reported once Phase B has completed accrual and the 5-year follow-ups are completed. DISCUSSION: If successfully completed, the RAVAL Trial will have studied patient-reported outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and survival of robotic- versus video-assisted lobectomy in a prospective, randomized, blinded fashion in an international setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02617186. Registered 22-September-2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02617186
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8809527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88095272022-02-03 RAVAL trial: Protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer Patel, Yogita S. Hanna, Waël C. Fahim, Christine Shargall, Yaron Waddell, Thomas K. Yasufuku, Kazuhiro Machuca, Tiago N. Pipkin, Mauricio Baste, Jean-Marc Xie, Feng Shiwcharan, Andrea Foster, Gary Thabane, Lehana PLoS One Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Retrospective data demonstrates that robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery provides many benefits, such as decreased postoperative pain, lower mortality, shorter length of stay, shorter chest tube duration, and reductions in the incidence of common postoperative pulmonary complications, when compared to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Despite the potential benefits of robotic surgery, there are two major barriers against its widespread adoption in thoracic surgery: lack of high-quality prospective data, and the perceived higher cost of it. Therefore, in the face of these barriers, a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing robotic- to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is needed. The RAVAL trial is a two-phase, international, multi-centered, blinded, parallel, randomized controlled trial that is comparing robotic- to video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer that has been enrolling patients since 2016. METHODS: The RAVAL trial will be conducted in two phases: Phase A will enroll 186 early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients who are candidates for minimally invasive pulmonary lobectomy; while Phase B will continue to recruit until 592 patients are enrolled. After consent, participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either robotic- or video-assisted lobectomy, and blinded to the type of surgery they are allocated to. Health-related quality of life questionnaires will be administered at baseline, postoperative day 1, weeks 3, 7, 12, months 6, 12, 18, 24, and years 3, 4, 5. The primary objective of the RAVAL trial is to determine the difference in patient-reported health-related quality of life outcomes between the robotic- and video-assisted lobectomy groups at 12 weeks. Secondary objectives include determining the differences in cost-effectiveness, and in the 5-year survival data between the two arms. The results of the primary objective will be reported once Phase A has completed accrual and the 12-month follow-ups are completed. The results of the secondary objectives will be reported once Phase B has completed accrual and the 5-year follow-ups are completed. DISCUSSION: If successfully completed, the RAVAL Trial will have studied patient-reported outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and survival of robotic- versus video-assisted lobectomy in a prospective, randomized, blinded fashion in an international setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02617186. Registered 22-September-2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02617186 Public Library of Science 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8809527/ /pubmed/35108265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261767 Text en © 2022 Patel et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Patel, Yogita S.
Hanna, Waël C.
Fahim, Christine
Shargall, Yaron
Waddell, Thomas K.
Yasufuku, Kazuhiro
Machuca, Tiago N.
Pipkin, Mauricio
Baste, Jean-Marc
Xie, Feng
Shiwcharan, Andrea
Foster, Gary
Thabane, Lehana
RAVAL trial: Protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer
title RAVAL trial: Protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer
title_full RAVAL trial: Protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer
title_fullStr RAVAL trial: Protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed RAVAL trial: Protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer
title_short RAVAL trial: Protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer
title_sort raval trial: protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8809527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35108265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261767
work_keys_str_mv AT patelyogitas ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer
AT hannawaelc ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer
AT fahimchristine ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer
AT shargallyaron ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer
AT waddellthomask ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer
AT yasufukukazuhiro ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer
AT machucatiagon ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer
AT pipkinmauricio ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer
AT bastejeanmarc ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer
AT xiefeng ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer
AT shiwcharanandrea ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer
AT fostergary ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer
AT thabanelehana ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer