Cargando…
RAVAL trial: Protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer
BACKGROUND: Retrospective data demonstrates that robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery provides many benefits, such as decreased postoperative pain, lower mortality, shorter length of stay, shorter chest tube duration, and reductions in the incidence of common postoperative pulmonary complications,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8809527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35108265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261767 |
_version_ | 1784644034589884416 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Yogita S. Hanna, Waël C. Fahim, Christine Shargall, Yaron Waddell, Thomas K. Yasufuku, Kazuhiro Machuca, Tiago N. Pipkin, Mauricio Baste, Jean-Marc Xie, Feng Shiwcharan, Andrea Foster, Gary Thabane, Lehana |
author_facet | Patel, Yogita S. Hanna, Waël C. Fahim, Christine Shargall, Yaron Waddell, Thomas K. Yasufuku, Kazuhiro Machuca, Tiago N. Pipkin, Mauricio Baste, Jean-Marc Xie, Feng Shiwcharan, Andrea Foster, Gary Thabane, Lehana |
author_sort | Patel, Yogita S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Retrospective data demonstrates that robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery provides many benefits, such as decreased postoperative pain, lower mortality, shorter length of stay, shorter chest tube duration, and reductions in the incidence of common postoperative pulmonary complications, when compared to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Despite the potential benefits of robotic surgery, there are two major barriers against its widespread adoption in thoracic surgery: lack of high-quality prospective data, and the perceived higher cost of it. Therefore, in the face of these barriers, a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing robotic- to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is needed. The RAVAL trial is a two-phase, international, multi-centered, blinded, parallel, randomized controlled trial that is comparing robotic- to video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer that has been enrolling patients since 2016. METHODS: The RAVAL trial will be conducted in two phases: Phase A will enroll 186 early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients who are candidates for minimally invasive pulmonary lobectomy; while Phase B will continue to recruit until 592 patients are enrolled. After consent, participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either robotic- or video-assisted lobectomy, and blinded to the type of surgery they are allocated to. Health-related quality of life questionnaires will be administered at baseline, postoperative day 1, weeks 3, 7, 12, months 6, 12, 18, 24, and years 3, 4, 5. The primary objective of the RAVAL trial is to determine the difference in patient-reported health-related quality of life outcomes between the robotic- and video-assisted lobectomy groups at 12 weeks. Secondary objectives include determining the differences in cost-effectiveness, and in the 5-year survival data between the two arms. The results of the primary objective will be reported once Phase A has completed accrual and the 12-month follow-ups are completed. The results of the secondary objectives will be reported once Phase B has completed accrual and the 5-year follow-ups are completed. DISCUSSION: If successfully completed, the RAVAL Trial will have studied patient-reported outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and survival of robotic- versus video-assisted lobectomy in a prospective, randomized, blinded fashion in an international setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02617186. Registered 22-September-2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02617186 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8809527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88095272022-02-03 RAVAL trial: Protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer Patel, Yogita S. Hanna, Waël C. Fahim, Christine Shargall, Yaron Waddell, Thomas K. Yasufuku, Kazuhiro Machuca, Tiago N. Pipkin, Mauricio Baste, Jean-Marc Xie, Feng Shiwcharan, Andrea Foster, Gary Thabane, Lehana PLoS One Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Retrospective data demonstrates that robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery provides many benefits, such as decreased postoperative pain, lower mortality, shorter length of stay, shorter chest tube duration, and reductions in the incidence of common postoperative pulmonary complications, when compared to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Despite the potential benefits of robotic surgery, there are two major barriers against its widespread adoption in thoracic surgery: lack of high-quality prospective data, and the perceived higher cost of it. Therefore, in the face of these barriers, a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing robotic- to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is needed. The RAVAL trial is a two-phase, international, multi-centered, blinded, parallel, randomized controlled trial that is comparing robotic- to video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer that has been enrolling patients since 2016. METHODS: The RAVAL trial will be conducted in two phases: Phase A will enroll 186 early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients who are candidates for minimally invasive pulmonary lobectomy; while Phase B will continue to recruit until 592 patients are enrolled. After consent, participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either robotic- or video-assisted lobectomy, and blinded to the type of surgery they are allocated to. Health-related quality of life questionnaires will be administered at baseline, postoperative day 1, weeks 3, 7, 12, months 6, 12, 18, 24, and years 3, 4, 5. The primary objective of the RAVAL trial is to determine the difference in patient-reported health-related quality of life outcomes between the robotic- and video-assisted lobectomy groups at 12 weeks. Secondary objectives include determining the differences in cost-effectiveness, and in the 5-year survival data between the two arms. The results of the primary objective will be reported once Phase A has completed accrual and the 12-month follow-ups are completed. The results of the secondary objectives will be reported once Phase B has completed accrual and the 5-year follow-ups are completed. DISCUSSION: If successfully completed, the RAVAL Trial will have studied patient-reported outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and survival of robotic- versus video-assisted lobectomy in a prospective, randomized, blinded fashion in an international setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02617186. Registered 22-September-2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02617186 Public Library of Science 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8809527/ /pubmed/35108265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261767 Text en © 2022 Patel et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Patel, Yogita S. Hanna, Waël C. Fahim, Christine Shargall, Yaron Waddell, Thomas K. Yasufuku, Kazuhiro Machuca, Tiago N. Pipkin, Mauricio Baste, Jean-Marc Xie, Feng Shiwcharan, Andrea Foster, Gary Thabane, Lehana RAVAL trial: Protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer |
title | RAVAL trial: Protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer |
title_full | RAVAL trial: Protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer |
title_fullStr | RAVAL trial: Protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | RAVAL trial: Protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer |
title_short | RAVAL trial: Protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer |
title_sort | raval trial: protocol of an international, multi-centered, blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted versus video-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8809527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35108265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261767 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelyogitas ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer AT hannawaelc ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer AT fahimchristine ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer AT shargallyaron ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer AT waddellthomask ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer AT yasufukukazuhiro ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer AT machucatiagon ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer AT pipkinmauricio ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer AT bastejeanmarc ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer AT xiefeng ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer AT shiwcharanandrea ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer AT fostergary ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer AT thabanelehana ravaltrialprotocolofaninternationalmulticenteredblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingroboticassistedversusvideoassistedlobectomyforearlystagelungcancer |