Cargando…
Minimally invasive swine spine surgery training: technical aspects, benefits, and anatomical limitations
OBJECTIVE: To describe the technical specificities and feasibility of simulation of minimally invasive spine surgery in live pigs, as well as similarities and differences in comparison to surgery in humans. METHODS: A total of 22 Large White class swine models, weighing between 60 and 80kg, were sub...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8809647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35195190 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO6318 |
_version_ | 1784644064546652160 |
---|---|
author | Gotfryd, Alberto Ofenhejm de Paula, Fábio Chaud Sauma, Marcel Lobato Iutaka, Alexandre Sadao Rodrigues, Luciano Miller Reis Meyer, Guilherme Pereira Correa Teivelis, Marcelo Passos Poetscher, Arthur Werner Del Curto, David Kang, Davi Wen Wei Cintra, Luciana Gregores, Guilherme Buzon Lenza, Mario Ferretti, Mario |
author_facet | Gotfryd, Alberto Ofenhejm de Paula, Fábio Chaud Sauma, Marcel Lobato Iutaka, Alexandre Sadao Rodrigues, Luciano Miller Reis Meyer, Guilherme Pereira Correa Teivelis, Marcelo Passos Poetscher, Arthur Werner Del Curto, David Kang, Davi Wen Wei Cintra, Luciana Gregores, Guilherme Buzon Lenza, Mario Ferretti, Mario |
author_sort | Gotfryd, Alberto Ofenhejm |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To describe the technical specificities and feasibility of simulation of minimally invasive spine surgery in live pigs, as well as similarities and differences in comparison to surgery in humans. METHODS: A total of 22 Large White class swine models, weighing between 60 and 80kg, were submitted to surgical simulations, performed during theoretical-practical courses for training surgical techniques (microsurgical and endoscopic lumbar decompression; percutaneous pedicular instrumentation; lateral access to the thoracic spine, and anterior and retroperitoneal to the lumbar spine, and management of complications) by 86 spine surgeons. For each surgical technique, porcine anatomy (similarities and differences in relation to human anatomy), access route, and dimensions of the instruments and implants used were evaluated. Thus, the authors describe the feasibility of each operative simulation, as well as suggestions to optimize training. Study results are descriptive, with figures and drawings. RESULTS: Neural decompression surgeries (microsurgeries and endoscopic) and pedicular instrumentation presented higher similarities to surgery on humans. On the other hand, intradiscal procedures had limitations due to the narrow disc space in swines. We were able to simulate situations of surgical trauma in surgical complication scenarios, such as cerebrospinal fluid fistulas and excessive bleeding, with comparable realism to surgery on humans. CONCLUSION: A porcine model for simulation of minimally invasive spinal surgical techniques had similarities with surgery on humans, and is therefore feasible for surgeon training. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8809647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88096472022-02-05 Minimally invasive swine spine surgery training: technical aspects, benefits, and anatomical limitations Gotfryd, Alberto Ofenhejm de Paula, Fábio Chaud Sauma, Marcel Lobato Iutaka, Alexandre Sadao Rodrigues, Luciano Miller Reis Meyer, Guilherme Pereira Correa Teivelis, Marcelo Passos Poetscher, Arthur Werner Del Curto, David Kang, Davi Wen Wei Cintra, Luciana Gregores, Guilherme Buzon Lenza, Mario Ferretti, Mario Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To describe the technical specificities and feasibility of simulation of minimally invasive spine surgery in live pigs, as well as similarities and differences in comparison to surgery in humans. METHODS: A total of 22 Large White class swine models, weighing between 60 and 80kg, were submitted to surgical simulations, performed during theoretical-practical courses for training surgical techniques (microsurgical and endoscopic lumbar decompression; percutaneous pedicular instrumentation; lateral access to the thoracic spine, and anterior and retroperitoneal to the lumbar spine, and management of complications) by 86 spine surgeons. For each surgical technique, porcine anatomy (similarities and differences in relation to human anatomy), access route, and dimensions of the instruments and implants used were evaluated. Thus, the authors describe the feasibility of each operative simulation, as well as suggestions to optimize training. Study results are descriptive, with figures and drawings. RESULTS: Neural decompression surgeries (microsurgeries and endoscopic) and pedicular instrumentation presented higher similarities to surgery on humans. On the other hand, intradiscal procedures had limitations due to the narrow disc space in swines. We were able to simulate situations of surgical trauma in surgical complication scenarios, such as cerebrospinal fluid fistulas and excessive bleeding, with comparable realism to surgery on humans. CONCLUSION: A porcine model for simulation of minimally invasive spinal surgical techniques had similarities with surgery on humans, and is therefore feasible for surgeon training. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8809647/ /pubmed/35195190 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO6318 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gotfryd, Alberto Ofenhejm de Paula, Fábio Chaud Sauma, Marcel Lobato Iutaka, Alexandre Sadao Rodrigues, Luciano Miller Reis Meyer, Guilherme Pereira Correa Teivelis, Marcelo Passos Poetscher, Arthur Werner Del Curto, David Kang, Davi Wen Wei Cintra, Luciana Gregores, Guilherme Buzon Lenza, Mario Ferretti, Mario Minimally invasive swine spine surgery training: technical aspects, benefits, and anatomical limitations |
title | Minimally invasive swine spine surgery training: technical aspects, benefits, and anatomical limitations |
title_full | Minimally invasive swine spine surgery training: technical aspects, benefits, and anatomical limitations |
title_fullStr | Minimally invasive swine spine surgery training: technical aspects, benefits, and anatomical limitations |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally invasive swine spine surgery training: technical aspects, benefits, and anatomical limitations |
title_short | Minimally invasive swine spine surgery training: technical aspects, benefits, and anatomical limitations |
title_sort | minimally invasive swine spine surgery training: technical aspects, benefits, and anatomical limitations |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8809647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35195190 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO6318 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gotfrydalbertoofenhejm minimallyinvasiveswinespinesurgerytrainingtechnicalaspectsbenefitsandanatomicallimitations AT depaulafabiochaud minimallyinvasiveswinespinesurgerytrainingtechnicalaspectsbenefitsandanatomicallimitations AT saumamarcellobato minimallyinvasiveswinespinesurgerytrainingtechnicalaspectsbenefitsandanatomicallimitations AT iutakaalexandresadao minimallyinvasiveswinespinesurgerytrainingtechnicalaspectsbenefitsandanatomicallimitations AT rodrigueslucianomillerreis minimallyinvasiveswinespinesurgerytrainingtechnicalaspectsbenefitsandanatomicallimitations AT meyerguilhermepereiracorrea minimallyinvasiveswinespinesurgerytrainingtechnicalaspectsbenefitsandanatomicallimitations AT teivelismarcelopassos minimallyinvasiveswinespinesurgerytrainingtechnicalaspectsbenefitsandanatomicallimitations AT poetscherarthurwerner minimallyinvasiveswinespinesurgerytrainingtechnicalaspectsbenefitsandanatomicallimitations AT delcurtodavid minimallyinvasiveswinespinesurgerytrainingtechnicalaspectsbenefitsandanatomicallimitations AT kangdaviwenwei minimallyinvasiveswinespinesurgerytrainingtechnicalaspectsbenefitsandanatomicallimitations AT cintraluciana minimallyinvasiveswinespinesurgerytrainingtechnicalaspectsbenefitsandanatomicallimitations AT gregoresguilhermebuzon minimallyinvasiveswinespinesurgerytrainingtechnicalaspectsbenefitsandanatomicallimitations AT lenzamario minimallyinvasiveswinespinesurgerytrainingtechnicalaspectsbenefitsandanatomicallimitations AT ferrettimario minimallyinvasiveswinespinesurgerytrainingtechnicalaspectsbenefitsandanatomicallimitations |