Cargando…

The economic and public health impact of intellectual property licensing of medicines for low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study

BACKGROUND: Non-exclusive voluntary licensing that is access-oriented has been suggested as an option to increase access to medicines to address the COVID-19 pandemic. To date, there has been little research on the effect of licensing, mainly focused on economic and supply chain considerations, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morin, Sébastien, Moak, Hannah Barron, Bubb-Humfryes, Oliver, von Drehle, Christian, Lazarus, Jeffrey V, Burrone, Esteban
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8809901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34710359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00202-4
_version_ 1784644122672365568
author Morin, Sébastien
Moak, Hannah Barron
Bubb-Humfryes, Oliver
von Drehle, Christian
Lazarus, Jeffrey V
Burrone, Esteban
author_facet Morin, Sébastien
Moak, Hannah Barron
Bubb-Humfryes, Oliver
von Drehle, Christian
Lazarus, Jeffrey V
Burrone, Esteban
author_sort Morin, Sébastien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-exclusive voluntary licensing that is access-oriented has been suggested as an option to increase access to medicines to address the COVID-19 pandemic. To date, there has been little research on the effect of licensing, mainly focused on economic and supply chain considerations, and not on the benefits in terms of health outcomes. We aimed to study the economic and health effect of voluntary licensing for medicines for HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: A robust modelling framework was created to examine the difference between scenarios, with (factual) and without (counterfactual) a Medicines Patent Pool (MPP) licence for two medicines, dolutegravir and daclatasvir. Data were obtained from MPP licensees, as well as a large number of external sources. The primary outcomes were the cost savings and health impact between scenarios with and without MPP licences across all LMICs. Through its licences, MPP had access to the volumes and prices of licensed generic products sold in all covered countries on a quarterly basis. These data informed the volumes, prices, and uptake for the past factual scenarios and were the basis for modelling the future factual scenarios. These scenarios were then compared with a set of counterfactual scenarios in the absence of the studied licences. FINDINGS: Cumulatively, between 2017 and 2032, the model's central assumptions predicted an additional uptake of 15·494 (range 14·406–15·494) million patient-years of dolutegravir-based HIV treatments, 151 839 (34 575–312 973) deaths averted, and US$3·074 (1·837–5·617) billion saved through the MPP licence compared with the counterfactual scenario. For daclatasvir-based HCV treatments, the cumulative effect from 2015 to 2026 was predicted to be an additional uptake of 428 244 (127 584–636 270) patients treated with daclatasvir, 4070 (225–6323) deaths averted, and $107·593 (30·377–121·284) million saved with the licence compared with the counterfactual scenario. INTERPRETATION: The chain of effects linking upstream licensing to downstream outcomes can be modelled. Accordingly, credible quantitative estimates of economic and health effects arising from access-oriented voluntary licensing were obtained based on assumptions that early generic competition leads to price reductions that influence procurement decisions and enable the faster and broader uptake of recommended medicines, with beneficial economic and health effects. FUNDING: Unitaid.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8809901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88099012022-02-03 The economic and public health impact of intellectual property licensing of medicines for low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study Morin, Sébastien Moak, Hannah Barron Bubb-Humfryes, Oliver von Drehle, Christian Lazarus, Jeffrey V Burrone, Esteban Lancet Public Health Articles BACKGROUND: Non-exclusive voluntary licensing that is access-oriented has been suggested as an option to increase access to medicines to address the COVID-19 pandemic. To date, there has been little research on the effect of licensing, mainly focused on economic and supply chain considerations, and not on the benefits in terms of health outcomes. We aimed to study the economic and health effect of voluntary licensing for medicines for HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: A robust modelling framework was created to examine the difference between scenarios, with (factual) and without (counterfactual) a Medicines Patent Pool (MPP) licence for two medicines, dolutegravir and daclatasvir. Data were obtained from MPP licensees, as well as a large number of external sources. The primary outcomes were the cost savings and health impact between scenarios with and without MPP licences across all LMICs. Through its licences, MPP had access to the volumes and prices of licensed generic products sold in all covered countries on a quarterly basis. These data informed the volumes, prices, and uptake for the past factual scenarios and were the basis for modelling the future factual scenarios. These scenarios were then compared with a set of counterfactual scenarios in the absence of the studied licences. FINDINGS: Cumulatively, between 2017 and 2032, the model's central assumptions predicted an additional uptake of 15·494 (range 14·406–15·494) million patient-years of dolutegravir-based HIV treatments, 151 839 (34 575–312 973) deaths averted, and US$3·074 (1·837–5·617) billion saved through the MPP licence compared with the counterfactual scenario. For daclatasvir-based HCV treatments, the cumulative effect from 2015 to 2026 was predicted to be an additional uptake of 428 244 (127 584–636 270) patients treated with daclatasvir, 4070 (225–6323) deaths averted, and $107·593 (30·377–121·284) million saved with the licence compared with the counterfactual scenario. INTERPRETATION: The chain of effects linking upstream licensing to downstream outcomes can be modelled. Accordingly, credible quantitative estimates of economic and health effects arising from access-oriented voluntary licensing were obtained based on assumptions that early generic competition leads to price reductions that influence procurement decisions and enable the faster and broader uptake of recommended medicines, with beneficial economic and health effects. FUNDING: Unitaid. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-02 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8809901/ /pubmed/34710359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00202-4 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Articles
Morin, Sébastien
Moak, Hannah Barron
Bubb-Humfryes, Oliver
von Drehle, Christian
Lazarus, Jeffrey V
Burrone, Esteban
The economic and public health impact of intellectual property licensing of medicines for low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study
title The economic and public health impact of intellectual property licensing of medicines for low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study
title_full The economic and public health impact of intellectual property licensing of medicines for low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study
title_fullStr The economic and public health impact of intellectual property licensing of medicines for low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study
title_full_unstemmed The economic and public health impact of intellectual property licensing of medicines for low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study
title_short The economic and public health impact of intellectual property licensing of medicines for low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study
title_sort economic and public health impact of intellectual property licensing of medicines for low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8809901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34710359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00202-4
work_keys_str_mv AT morinsebastien theeconomicandpublichealthimpactofintellectualpropertylicensingofmedicinesforlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesamodellingstudy
AT moakhannahbarron theeconomicandpublichealthimpactofintellectualpropertylicensingofmedicinesforlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesamodellingstudy
AT bubbhumfryesoliver theeconomicandpublichealthimpactofintellectualpropertylicensingofmedicinesforlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesamodellingstudy
AT vondrehlechristian theeconomicandpublichealthimpactofintellectualpropertylicensingofmedicinesforlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesamodellingstudy
AT lazarusjeffreyv theeconomicandpublichealthimpactofintellectualpropertylicensingofmedicinesforlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesamodellingstudy
AT burroneesteban theeconomicandpublichealthimpactofintellectualpropertylicensingofmedicinesforlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesamodellingstudy
AT morinsebastien economicandpublichealthimpactofintellectualpropertylicensingofmedicinesforlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesamodellingstudy
AT moakhannahbarron economicandpublichealthimpactofintellectualpropertylicensingofmedicinesforlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesamodellingstudy
AT bubbhumfryesoliver economicandpublichealthimpactofintellectualpropertylicensingofmedicinesforlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesamodellingstudy
AT vondrehlechristian economicandpublichealthimpactofintellectualpropertylicensingofmedicinesforlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesamodellingstudy
AT lazarusjeffreyv economicandpublichealthimpactofintellectualpropertylicensingofmedicinesforlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesamodellingstudy
AT burroneesteban economicandpublichealthimpactofintellectualpropertylicensingofmedicinesforlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesamodellingstudy