Cargando…

Assessment of respiratory support decision and the outcome of invasive mechanical ventilation in severe COVID-19 with ARDS()

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an ongoing pandemic. Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is essential for the management of COVID-19 with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to assess the impact of compliance with a respiratory decision support system on the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Shuhan, Zhu, Fangfang, Hu, Hongtao, Xiang, Hui, Wang, Dawei, Wang, Jing, Li, Lu, Yang, Xiao, Qin, Aihua, Rao, Xin, Luo, Yun, Li, Jianguo, Kashani, Kianoush B., Hu, Bo, Peng, Zhiyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8810377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36785779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jointm.2021.12.003
_version_ 1784644242778357760
author Cai, Shuhan
Zhu, Fangfang
Hu, Hongtao
Xiang, Hui
Wang, Dawei
Wang, Jing
Li, Lu
Yang, Xiao
Qin, Aihua
Rao, Xin
Luo, Yun
Li, Jianguo
Kashani, Kianoush B.
Hu, Bo
Peng, Zhiyong
author_facet Cai, Shuhan
Zhu, Fangfang
Hu, Hongtao
Xiang, Hui
Wang, Dawei
Wang, Jing
Li, Lu
Yang, Xiao
Qin, Aihua
Rao, Xin
Luo, Yun
Li, Jianguo
Kashani, Kianoush B.
Hu, Bo
Peng, Zhiyong
author_sort Cai, Shuhan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an ongoing pandemic. Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is essential for the management of COVID-19 with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to assess the impact of compliance with a respiratory decision support system on the outcomes of patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS who required IMV. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center, case series study, patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS who required IMV at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, China, from January 8th, 2020, to March 24th, 2020, with the final follow-up date of April 20th, 2020, were included. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, imaging, and management information were collected and analyzed. Compliance with the respiratory support decision system was documented, and its relationship with 28-day mortality was evaluated. RESULTS: The study included 46 COVID-19-associated ARDS patients who required IMV. The median age of the 46 patients was 68.5 years, and 31 were men. The partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO(2))/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)) ratio at intensive care unit (ICU) admission was 104 mmHg. The median total length of IMV was 12.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.0–27.3) days, and the median respiratory support decision score was 11.0 (IQR: 7.8–16.0). To 28 days after ICU admission, 18 (39.1%) patients died. Survivors had a significantly higher respiratory support decision score than non-survivors (15.0 [10.3–17.0] vs. 8.5 (6.0–10.3), P = 0.001). Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the discrimination of respiratory support decision score to 28-day mortality, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.796 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.657–0.934, P = 0.001) and the cut-off was 11.5 (sensitivity = 0.679, specificity = 0.889). Patients with a higher score (>11.5) were more likely to survive at 28 days after ICU admission (log-rank test, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For severe COVID-19-associated ARDS with IMV, following the respiratory support decision and assessing completion would improve the progress of ventilation. With a decision score of >11.5, the mortality at 28 days after ICU admission showed an obvious decrease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8810377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88103772022-02-03 Assessment of respiratory support decision and the outcome of invasive mechanical ventilation in severe COVID-19 with ARDS() Cai, Shuhan Zhu, Fangfang Hu, Hongtao Xiang, Hui Wang, Dawei Wang, Jing Li, Lu Yang, Xiao Qin, Aihua Rao, Xin Luo, Yun Li, Jianguo Kashani, Kianoush B. Hu, Bo Peng, Zhiyong J Intensive Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an ongoing pandemic. Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is essential for the management of COVID-19 with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to assess the impact of compliance with a respiratory decision support system on the outcomes of patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS who required IMV. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center, case series study, patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS who required IMV at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, China, from January 8th, 2020, to March 24th, 2020, with the final follow-up date of April 20th, 2020, were included. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, imaging, and management information were collected and analyzed. Compliance with the respiratory support decision system was documented, and its relationship with 28-day mortality was evaluated. RESULTS: The study included 46 COVID-19-associated ARDS patients who required IMV. The median age of the 46 patients was 68.5 years, and 31 were men. The partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO(2))/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)) ratio at intensive care unit (ICU) admission was 104 mmHg. The median total length of IMV was 12.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.0–27.3) days, and the median respiratory support decision score was 11.0 (IQR: 7.8–16.0). To 28 days after ICU admission, 18 (39.1%) patients died. Survivors had a significantly higher respiratory support decision score than non-survivors (15.0 [10.3–17.0] vs. 8.5 (6.0–10.3), P = 0.001). Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the discrimination of respiratory support decision score to 28-day mortality, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.796 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.657–0.934, P = 0.001) and the cut-off was 11.5 (sensitivity = 0.679, specificity = 0.889). Patients with a higher score (>11.5) were more likely to survive at 28 days after ICU admission (log-rank test, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For severe COVID-19-associated ARDS with IMV, following the respiratory support decision and assessing completion would improve the progress of ventilation. With a decision score of >11.5, the mortality at 28 days after ICU admission showed an obvious decrease. Elsevier 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8810377/ /pubmed/36785779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jointm.2021.12.003 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Medical Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Cai, Shuhan
Zhu, Fangfang
Hu, Hongtao
Xiang, Hui
Wang, Dawei
Wang, Jing
Li, Lu
Yang, Xiao
Qin, Aihua
Rao, Xin
Luo, Yun
Li, Jianguo
Kashani, Kianoush B.
Hu, Bo
Peng, Zhiyong
Assessment of respiratory support decision and the outcome of invasive mechanical ventilation in severe COVID-19 with ARDS()
title Assessment of respiratory support decision and the outcome of invasive mechanical ventilation in severe COVID-19 with ARDS()
title_full Assessment of respiratory support decision and the outcome of invasive mechanical ventilation in severe COVID-19 with ARDS()
title_fullStr Assessment of respiratory support decision and the outcome of invasive mechanical ventilation in severe COVID-19 with ARDS()
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of respiratory support decision and the outcome of invasive mechanical ventilation in severe COVID-19 with ARDS()
title_short Assessment of respiratory support decision and the outcome of invasive mechanical ventilation in severe COVID-19 with ARDS()
title_sort assessment of respiratory support decision and the outcome of invasive mechanical ventilation in severe covid-19 with ards()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8810377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36785779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jointm.2021.12.003
work_keys_str_mv AT caishuhan assessmentofrespiratorysupportdecisionandtheoutcomeofinvasivemechanicalventilationinseverecovid19withards
AT zhufangfang assessmentofrespiratorysupportdecisionandtheoutcomeofinvasivemechanicalventilationinseverecovid19withards
AT huhongtao assessmentofrespiratorysupportdecisionandtheoutcomeofinvasivemechanicalventilationinseverecovid19withards
AT xianghui assessmentofrespiratorysupportdecisionandtheoutcomeofinvasivemechanicalventilationinseverecovid19withards
AT wangdawei assessmentofrespiratorysupportdecisionandtheoutcomeofinvasivemechanicalventilationinseverecovid19withards
AT wangjing assessmentofrespiratorysupportdecisionandtheoutcomeofinvasivemechanicalventilationinseverecovid19withards
AT lilu assessmentofrespiratorysupportdecisionandtheoutcomeofinvasivemechanicalventilationinseverecovid19withards
AT yangxiao assessmentofrespiratorysupportdecisionandtheoutcomeofinvasivemechanicalventilationinseverecovid19withards
AT qinaihua assessmentofrespiratorysupportdecisionandtheoutcomeofinvasivemechanicalventilationinseverecovid19withards
AT raoxin assessmentofrespiratorysupportdecisionandtheoutcomeofinvasivemechanicalventilationinseverecovid19withards
AT luoyun assessmentofrespiratorysupportdecisionandtheoutcomeofinvasivemechanicalventilationinseverecovid19withards
AT lijianguo assessmentofrespiratorysupportdecisionandtheoutcomeofinvasivemechanicalventilationinseverecovid19withards
AT kashanikianoushb assessmentofrespiratorysupportdecisionandtheoutcomeofinvasivemechanicalventilationinseverecovid19withards
AT hubo assessmentofrespiratorysupportdecisionandtheoutcomeofinvasivemechanicalventilationinseverecovid19withards
AT pengzhiyong assessmentofrespiratorysupportdecisionandtheoutcomeofinvasivemechanicalventilationinseverecovid19withards