Cargando…

Assessment of preauthorization and 24-hour expert consultation as a restrictive antimicrobial stewardship bundle in a Brazilian tertiary-care hospital: an interrupted time series analysis

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, healthcare facilities face high and often inappropriate consumption of antimicrobials. However, there are limited antimicrobial stewardship (ASP) studies from low- and middle-income countries that include restrictive measures and their impacts on antimicrobial consumption. AIM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doltrario, Andréa Beltrami, Gaspar, Gilberto Gambero, Ungari, Andrea Queiroz, Martinez, Roberto, Pazin Filho, Antonio, Maciel, Benedito Carlos, Bellissimo-Rodrigues, Fernando, Santana, Rodrigo de Carvalho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8810400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35141515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2022.100201
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Worldwide, healthcare facilities face high and often inappropriate consumption of antimicrobials. However, there are limited antimicrobial stewardship (ASP) studies from low- and middle-income countries that include restrictive measures and their impacts on antimicrobial consumption. AIM: This study aims to assess the impact of a restrictive bundle (preauthorization requirements and offering consultation with an infectious diseases physician 24 hours a day) on antimicrobial consumption, in a tertiary hospital in Brazil. METHODS: We conducted an interrupted time series analysis (ITS) with pharmacy-based data from January 2010 to December 2018 to evaluate changes of level and slope in antimicrobial consumption (expressed in DDD/1,000 patient-days) after the implementation of the restrictive bundle in September 2014. Fourteen restricted antimicrobials (amphotericin B deoxycholate, liposomal amphotericin B, micafungin, voriconazole, ganciclovir, amikacin, ampicillin/sulbactam, daptomycin, ertapenem, levofloxacin, linezolid, piperacillin/tazobactam, polymyxin B, and tigecycline) and eight unrestricted were analysed. FINDINGS: Among the 14 restricted antimicrobials, four presented a significant negative level change: micafungin (-2,14, p=.027), voriconazole (-14.72, p<.001), ertapenem (-1.89, p=.007) and amikacin (-13.98, p<.001). The only negative slope change was observed for the liposomal amphotericin B, -0.532 (p=.009). The restricted antibiotics group presented an increased consumption trend (1.068, p=.002) compared to the pre-intervention period, a similar change was observed for the unrestricted antibiotics group (1.360, p<.001). CONCLUSION: Preauthorization and 24 hour expert consultation were partially effective as a restrictive antimicrobial stewardship bundle in a Brazilian tertiary-care hospital. Increased consumption of unrestricted antimicrobials was observed as a side effect of the intervention.