Cargando…

Active Middle Ear Implant Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Intensity-Latency Characteristics

OBJECTIVE: To analyze intensity-latency functions of intraoperative auditory evoked brainstem responses (ABRs) to stimulation by the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) active middle ear implant with respect to coupling efficiency, VSB evoked ABR thresholds, and coupling modality [oval window (OW) placement v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fröhlich, Laura, Müller, Alexander, Kropp, Miriam H., Mir-Salim, Parwis, Dziemba, Oliver, Oberhoffner, Tobias, Plontke, Stefan K., Rahne, Torsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8810535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126279
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.739906
_version_ 1784644276037091328
author Fröhlich, Laura
Müller, Alexander
Kropp, Miriam H.
Mir-Salim, Parwis
Dziemba, Oliver
Oberhoffner, Tobias
Plontke, Stefan K.
Rahne, Torsten
author_facet Fröhlich, Laura
Müller, Alexander
Kropp, Miriam H.
Mir-Salim, Parwis
Dziemba, Oliver
Oberhoffner, Tobias
Plontke, Stefan K.
Rahne, Torsten
author_sort Fröhlich, Laura
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze intensity-latency functions of intraoperative auditory evoked brainstem responses (ABRs) to stimulation by the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) active middle ear implant with respect to coupling efficiency, VSB evoked ABR thresholds, and coupling modality [oval window (OW) placement vs. Incus placement and vs. round window (RW) placement]. STUDY DESIGN: Exploratory study. SETTING: Bi-centric study at tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS: Twenty-four patients (10 female, 14 male, mean age: 58 years) who received a VSB. OUTCOME MEASURES: Wave-V intensity-latency functions of intraoperative VSB evoked ABRs using a modified audio processor programmed to preoperative bone conduction thresholds for stimulation. Threshold level correction to coupling efficiency and ABR thresholds. Individual plots and exponential function fits. RESULTS: After ABR threshold level correction, the latency functions could be aligned. A large variance of latencies was observed at individual threshold level. Wave-V latency was longest in the Incus placement subgroup (9.73 ms, SD: 1.04) as compared to OW placement subgroup (9.47 ms, SD: 1.05), with the shortest latency in the RW placement subgroup (8.99 ms, SD: 0.68). For increasing stimulation levels, the variance decreased with intensity-latency function slopes converging toward a steady-state (saturation) latency caused by saturation of audio processor (stimulation) gain. Latency saturation was reached at a stimulation level of 50 dB nHL for the OW placement subgroup, 35 dB nHL for the Incus placement subgroup, and 30 dB nHL for the RW placement subgroup. The latency and saturation results indicated decreased dynamic range for RW placement, i.e., reverse stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: VSB evoked ABR wave-V intensity-latency function slopes were similar to acoustic stimulation at high stimulation levels with a shift toward longer latencies caused by audio processor signal delay. Saturation of latencies occurred for higher stimulation levels due to saturation of audio processor gain. Thus, the analysis of VSB evoked intensity-latency functions appears to allow for the objective assessment of a patient's individual dynamic range. This can further improve diagnostics as well as intraoperative and postoperative quality control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8810535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88105352022-02-04 Active Middle Ear Implant Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Intensity-Latency Characteristics Fröhlich, Laura Müller, Alexander Kropp, Miriam H. Mir-Salim, Parwis Dziemba, Oliver Oberhoffner, Tobias Plontke, Stefan K. Rahne, Torsten Front Neurol Neurology OBJECTIVE: To analyze intensity-latency functions of intraoperative auditory evoked brainstem responses (ABRs) to stimulation by the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) active middle ear implant with respect to coupling efficiency, VSB evoked ABR thresholds, and coupling modality [oval window (OW) placement vs. Incus placement and vs. round window (RW) placement]. STUDY DESIGN: Exploratory study. SETTING: Bi-centric study at tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS: Twenty-four patients (10 female, 14 male, mean age: 58 years) who received a VSB. OUTCOME MEASURES: Wave-V intensity-latency functions of intraoperative VSB evoked ABRs using a modified audio processor programmed to preoperative bone conduction thresholds for stimulation. Threshold level correction to coupling efficiency and ABR thresholds. Individual plots and exponential function fits. RESULTS: After ABR threshold level correction, the latency functions could be aligned. A large variance of latencies was observed at individual threshold level. Wave-V latency was longest in the Incus placement subgroup (9.73 ms, SD: 1.04) as compared to OW placement subgroup (9.47 ms, SD: 1.05), with the shortest latency in the RW placement subgroup (8.99 ms, SD: 0.68). For increasing stimulation levels, the variance decreased with intensity-latency function slopes converging toward a steady-state (saturation) latency caused by saturation of audio processor (stimulation) gain. Latency saturation was reached at a stimulation level of 50 dB nHL for the OW placement subgroup, 35 dB nHL for the Incus placement subgroup, and 30 dB nHL for the RW placement subgroup. The latency and saturation results indicated decreased dynamic range for RW placement, i.e., reverse stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: VSB evoked ABR wave-V intensity-latency function slopes were similar to acoustic stimulation at high stimulation levels with a shift toward longer latencies caused by audio processor signal delay. Saturation of latencies occurred for higher stimulation levels due to saturation of audio processor gain. Thus, the analysis of VSB evoked intensity-latency functions appears to allow for the objective assessment of a patient's individual dynamic range. This can further improve diagnostics as well as intraoperative and postoperative quality control. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8810535/ /pubmed/35126279 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.739906 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fröhlich, Müller, Kropp, Mir-Salim, Dziemba, Oberhoffner, Plontke and Rahne. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Fröhlich, Laura
Müller, Alexander
Kropp, Miriam H.
Mir-Salim, Parwis
Dziemba, Oliver
Oberhoffner, Tobias
Plontke, Stefan K.
Rahne, Torsten
Active Middle Ear Implant Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Intensity-Latency Characteristics
title Active Middle Ear Implant Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Intensity-Latency Characteristics
title_full Active Middle Ear Implant Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Intensity-Latency Characteristics
title_fullStr Active Middle Ear Implant Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Intensity-Latency Characteristics
title_full_unstemmed Active Middle Ear Implant Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Intensity-Latency Characteristics
title_short Active Middle Ear Implant Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Intensity-Latency Characteristics
title_sort active middle ear implant evoked auditory brainstem response intensity-latency characteristics
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8810535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126279
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.739906
work_keys_str_mv AT frohlichlaura activemiddleearimplantevokedauditorybrainstemresponseintensitylatencycharacteristics
AT mulleralexander activemiddleearimplantevokedauditorybrainstemresponseintensitylatencycharacteristics
AT kroppmiriamh activemiddleearimplantevokedauditorybrainstemresponseintensitylatencycharacteristics
AT mirsalimparwis activemiddleearimplantevokedauditorybrainstemresponseintensitylatencycharacteristics
AT dziembaoliver activemiddleearimplantevokedauditorybrainstemresponseintensitylatencycharacteristics
AT oberhoffnertobias activemiddleearimplantevokedauditorybrainstemresponseintensitylatencycharacteristics
AT plontkestefank activemiddleearimplantevokedauditorybrainstemresponseintensitylatencycharacteristics
AT rahnetorsten activemiddleearimplantevokedauditorybrainstemresponseintensitylatencycharacteristics