Cargando…

A Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Selinexor in Recurrent Glioblastoma

PURPOSE: Selinexor is an oral selective inhibitor of exportin-1 (XPO1) with efficacy in various solid and hematologic tumors. We assessed intratumoral penetration, safety, and efficacy of selinexor monotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-six adults with Karnofsky Perfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lassman, Andrew B., Wen, Patrick Y., van den Bent, Martin J., Plotkin, Scott R., Walenkamp, Annemiek M.E., Green, Adam L., Li, Kai, Walker, Christopher J., Chang, Hua, Tamir, Sharon, Henegar, Leah, Shen, Yao, Alvarez, Mariano J., Califano, Andrea, Landesman, Yosef, Kauffman, Michael G., Shacham, Sharon, Mau-Sørensen, Morten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for Cancer Research 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8810630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2225
_version_ 1784644285095739392
author Lassman, Andrew B.
Wen, Patrick Y.
van den Bent, Martin J.
Plotkin, Scott R.
Walenkamp, Annemiek M.E.
Green, Adam L.
Li, Kai
Walker, Christopher J.
Chang, Hua
Tamir, Sharon
Henegar, Leah
Shen, Yao
Alvarez, Mariano J.
Califano, Andrea
Landesman, Yosef
Kauffman, Michael G.
Shacham, Sharon
Mau-Sørensen, Morten
author_facet Lassman, Andrew B.
Wen, Patrick Y.
van den Bent, Martin J.
Plotkin, Scott R.
Walenkamp, Annemiek M.E.
Green, Adam L.
Li, Kai
Walker, Christopher J.
Chang, Hua
Tamir, Sharon
Henegar, Leah
Shen, Yao
Alvarez, Mariano J.
Califano, Andrea
Landesman, Yosef
Kauffman, Michael G.
Shacham, Sharon
Mau-Sørensen, Morten
author_sort Lassman, Andrew B.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Selinexor is an oral selective inhibitor of exportin-1 (XPO1) with efficacy in various solid and hematologic tumors. We assessed intratumoral penetration, safety, and efficacy of selinexor monotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-six adults with Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 60 were enrolled. Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery received up to three selinexor doses (twice weekly) preoperatively (Arm A; n = 8 patients). Patients not undergoing surgery received 50 mg/m(2) (Arm B, n = 24), or 60 mg (Arm C, n = 14) twice weekly, or 80 mg once weekly (Arm D; n = 30). Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFS6). RESULTS: Median selinexor concentrations in resected tumors from patients receiving presurgical selinexor was 105.4 nmol/L (range 39.7–291 nmol/L). In Arms B, C, and D, respectively, the PFS6 was 10% [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.79–35.9], 7.7% (95% CI, 1.17–50.6), and 17% (95% CI, 7.78–38.3). Measurable reduction in tumor size was observed in 19 (28%) and RANO-response rate overall was 8.8% [Arm B, 8.3% (95% CI, 1.0–27.0); C: 7.7% (95% CI, 0.2–36.0); D: 10% (95% CI, 2.1–26.5)], with one complete and two durable partial responses in Arm D. Serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 26 (34%) patients; 1 (1.3%) was fatal. The most common treatment-related AEs were fatigue (61%), nausea (59%), decreased appetite (43%), and thrombocytopenia (43%), and were manageable by supportive care and dose modification. Molecular studies identified a signature predictive of response (AUC = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: At 80 mg weekly, single-agent selinexor induced responses and clinically relevant PFS6 with manageable side effects requiring dose reductions. Ongoing trials are evaluating safety and efficacy of selinexor in combination with other therapies for newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8810630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Association for Cancer Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88106302022-02-03 A Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Selinexor in Recurrent Glioblastoma Lassman, Andrew B. Wen, Patrick Y. van den Bent, Martin J. Plotkin, Scott R. Walenkamp, Annemiek M.E. Green, Adam L. Li, Kai Walker, Christopher J. Chang, Hua Tamir, Sharon Henegar, Leah Shen, Yao Alvarez, Mariano J. Califano, Andrea Landesman, Yosef Kauffman, Michael G. Shacham, Sharon Mau-Sørensen, Morten Clin Cancer Res Clinical Trials: Targeted Therapy PURPOSE: Selinexor is an oral selective inhibitor of exportin-1 (XPO1) with efficacy in various solid and hematologic tumors. We assessed intratumoral penetration, safety, and efficacy of selinexor monotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-six adults with Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 60 were enrolled. Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery received up to three selinexor doses (twice weekly) preoperatively (Arm A; n = 8 patients). Patients not undergoing surgery received 50 mg/m(2) (Arm B, n = 24), or 60 mg (Arm C, n = 14) twice weekly, or 80 mg once weekly (Arm D; n = 30). Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFS6). RESULTS: Median selinexor concentrations in resected tumors from patients receiving presurgical selinexor was 105.4 nmol/L (range 39.7–291 nmol/L). In Arms B, C, and D, respectively, the PFS6 was 10% [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.79–35.9], 7.7% (95% CI, 1.17–50.6), and 17% (95% CI, 7.78–38.3). Measurable reduction in tumor size was observed in 19 (28%) and RANO-response rate overall was 8.8% [Arm B, 8.3% (95% CI, 1.0–27.0); C: 7.7% (95% CI, 0.2–36.0); D: 10% (95% CI, 2.1–26.5)], with one complete and two durable partial responses in Arm D. Serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 26 (34%) patients; 1 (1.3%) was fatal. The most common treatment-related AEs were fatigue (61%), nausea (59%), decreased appetite (43%), and thrombocytopenia (43%), and were manageable by supportive care and dose modification. Molecular studies identified a signature predictive of response (AUC = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: At 80 mg weekly, single-agent selinexor induced responses and clinically relevant PFS6 with manageable side effects requiring dose reductions. Ongoing trials are evaluating safety and efficacy of selinexor in combination with other therapies for newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma. American Association for Cancer Research 2022-02-01 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8810630/ /pubmed/34728525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2225 Text en ©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.
spellingShingle Clinical Trials: Targeted Therapy
Lassman, Andrew B.
Wen, Patrick Y.
van den Bent, Martin J.
Plotkin, Scott R.
Walenkamp, Annemiek M.E.
Green, Adam L.
Li, Kai
Walker, Christopher J.
Chang, Hua
Tamir, Sharon
Henegar, Leah
Shen, Yao
Alvarez, Mariano J.
Califano, Andrea
Landesman, Yosef
Kauffman, Michael G.
Shacham, Sharon
Mau-Sørensen, Morten
A Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Selinexor in Recurrent Glioblastoma
title A Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Selinexor in Recurrent Glioblastoma
title_full A Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Selinexor in Recurrent Glioblastoma
title_fullStr A Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Selinexor in Recurrent Glioblastoma
title_full_unstemmed A Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Selinexor in Recurrent Glioblastoma
title_short A Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Selinexor in Recurrent Glioblastoma
title_sort phase ii study of the efficacy and safety of oral selinexor in recurrent glioblastoma
topic Clinical Trials: Targeted Therapy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8810630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2225
work_keys_str_mv AT lassmanandrewb aphaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT wenpatricky aphaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT vandenbentmartinj aphaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT plotkinscottr aphaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT walenkampannemiekme aphaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT greenadaml aphaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT likai aphaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT walkerchristopherj aphaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT changhua aphaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT tamirsharon aphaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT henegarleah aphaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT shenyao aphaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT alvarezmarianoj aphaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT califanoandrea aphaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT landesmanyosef aphaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT kauffmanmichaelg aphaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT shachamsharon aphaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT mausørensenmorten aphaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT lassmanandrewb phaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT wenpatricky phaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT vandenbentmartinj phaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT plotkinscottr phaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT walenkampannemiekme phaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT greenadaml phaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT likai phaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT walkerchristopherj phaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT changhua phaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT tamirsharon phaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT henegarleah phaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT shenyao phaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT alvarezmarianoj phaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT califanoandrea phaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT landesmanyosef phaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT kauffmanmichaelg phaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT shachamsharon phaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma
AT mausørensenmorten phaseiistudyoftheefficacyandsafetyoforalselinexorinrecurrentglioblastoma