Cargando…

Comparison between headless cannulated screws and partially threaded screws in femoral neck fracture treatment: a retrospective cohort study

The choices of the treatments for femoral neck fractures (FNF) remain controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognoses of the variable pitch fully threaded headless cannulated screws (HCS) in the fixation of femoral neck fractures and to compare them with those of partially thre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yilin, Han, Na, Zhang, Dianying, Zhang, Peixun, Jiang, Baoguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8810802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35110568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03494-3
_version_ 1784644306030559232
author Wang, Yilin
Han, Na
Zhang, Dianying
Zhang, Peixun
Jiang, Baoguo
author_facet Wang, Yilin
Han, Na
Zhang, Dianying
Zhang, Peixun
Jiang, Baoguo
author_sort Wang, Yilin
collection PubMed
description The choices of the treatments for femoral neck fractures (FNF) remain controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognoses of the variable pitch fully threaded headless cannulated screws (HCS) in the fixation of femoral neck fractures and to compare them with those of partially threaded cannulated screws (PCS). Between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2016, there were 89 patients with the main diagnose of FNF who accepted the treatment of closed reduction cannulated screw fixation in Peking University People’s Hospital. 34 cases of PCS and 23 cases of HCS met the criterion. The characteristics, prognoses and the imaging changes of all cases were described and the differences between the two groups were compared. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., USA). Mann–Whitney U test, Analysis of Variance and Chi-square test were used. Statistical significance was defined as P value (two sided) less than 0.05. There was no significant difference in the general characteristics, fracture classifications and reduction quality between the two groups. HCS group had a significant lower angle decrease rate (30.4% vs. 58.8%, P = 0.035), femoral neck shortening rate (26.1% vs. 52.9%, P = 0.044) and screw back-sliding rate (21.7% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.032), but a higher screw cut-out rate (21.7% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.008). In non-displacement fracture subgroup, HCS had significant higher Harris Score (92 vs. 90, P = 0.048). Compared with PCS, HCS had a lower screw back-sliding rate, femoral shortening rate, angle decrease rate and similar function score, but would result in more screw cut-outs in displaced FNF. As a conclusion, HCS should not be used in displaced FNF due to its higher screw cut-out rate, and its potential advantage in non-displaced FNF needs to be further proved. Further qualified investigations with a larger scale of patients and longer follow-up are needed in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8810802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88108022022-02-03 Comparison between headless cannulated screws and partially threaded screws in femoral neck fracture treatment: a retrospective cohort study Wang, Yilin Han, Na Zhang, Dianying Zhang, Peixun Jiang, Baoguo Sci Rep Article The choices of the treatments for femoral neck fractures (FNF) remain controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognoses of the variable pitch fully threaded headless cannulated screws (HCS) in the fixation of femoral neck fractures and to compare them with those of partially threaded cannulated screws (PCS). Between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2016, there were 89 patients with the main diagnose of FNF who accepted the treatment of closed reduction cannulated screw fixation in Peking University People’s Hospital. 34 cases of PCS and 23 cases of HCS met the criterion. The characteristics, prognoses and the imaging changes of all cases were described and the differences between the two groups were compared. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., USA). Mann–Whitney U test, Analysis of Variance and Chi-square test were used. Statistical significance was defined as P value (two sided) less than 0.05. There was no significant difference in the general characteristics, fracture classifications and reduction quality between the two groups. HCS group had a significant lower angle decrease rate (30.4% vs. 58.8%, P = 0.035), femoral neck shortening rate (26.1% vs. 52.9%, P = 0.044) and screw back-sliding rate (21.7% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.032), but a higher screw cut-out rate (21.7% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.008). In non-displacement fracture subgroup, HCS had significant higher Harris Score (92 vs. 90, P = 0.048). Compared with PCS, HCS had a lower screw back-sliding rate, femoral shortening rate, angle decrease rate and similar function score, but would result in more screw cut-outs in displaced FNF. As a conclusion, HCS should not be used in displaced FNF due to its higher screw cut-out rate, and its potential advantage in non-displaced FNF needs to be further proved. Further qualified investigations with a larger scale of patients and longer follow-up are needed in the future. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8810802/ /pubmed/35110568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03494-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Yilin
Han, Na
Zhang, Dianying
Zhang, Peixun
Jiang, Baoguo
Comparison between headless cannulated screws and partially threaded screws in femoral neck fracture treatment: a retrospective cohort study
title Comparison between headless cannulated screws and partially threaded screws in femoral neck fracture treatment: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Comparison between headless cannulated screws and partially threaded screws in femoral neck fracture treatment: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Comparison between headless cannulated screws and partially threaded screws in femoral neck fracture treatment: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between headless cannulated screws and partially threaded screws in femoral neck fracture treatment: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Comparison between headless cannulated screws and partially threaded screws in femoral neck fracture treatment: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort comparison between headless cannulated screws and partially threaded screws in femoral neck fracture treatment: a retrospective cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8810802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35110568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03494-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyilin comparisonbetweenheadlesscannulatedscrewsandpartiallythreadedscrewsinfemoralneckfracturetreatmentaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hanna comparisonbetweenheadlesscannulatedscrewsandpartiallythreadedscrewsinfemoralneckfracturetreatmentaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhangdianying comparisonbetweenheadlesscannulatedscrewsandpartiallythreadedscrewsinfemoralneckfracturetreatmentaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhangpeixun comparisonbetweenheadlesscannulatedscrewsandpartiallythreadedscrewsinfemoralneckfracturetreatmentaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jiangbaoguo comparisonbetweenheadlesscannulatedscrewsandpartiallythreadedscrewsinfemoralneckfracturetreatmentaretrospectivecohortstudy