Cargando…
Comparing Geant4 physics models for proton-induced dose deposition and radiolysis enhancement from a gold nanoparticle
Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are materials that make the tumor cells more radiosensitive when irradiated with ionizing radiation. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of different physical interaction models on the dose calculations and radiochemical results around the GNP. By applying the Ge...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8810973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35110613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05748-0 |
_version_ | 1784644340191068160 |
---|---|
author | Rajabpour, Saeed Saberi, Hassan Rasouli, Javad Jabbari, Nasrollah |
author_facet | Rajabpour, Saeed Saberi, Hassan Rasouli, Javad Jabbari, Nasrollah |
author_sort | Rajabpour, Saeed |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are materials that make the tumor cells more radiosensitive when irradiated with ionizing radiation. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of different physical interaction models on the dose calculations and radiochemical results around the GNP. By applying the Geant4 Monte Carlo (MC) toolkit, a single 50-nm GNP was simulated, which was immersed in a water phantom and irradiated with 5, 50, and 150 MeV proton beams. The present work assessed various parameters including the secondary electron spectra, secondary photon spectra, radial dose distribution (RDD), dose enhancement factor (DEF), and radiochemical yields around the GNP. The results with an acceptable statistical uncertainty of less than 1% indicated that low-energy electrons deriving from the ionization process formed a significant part of the total number of secondary particles generated in the presence of GNP; the Penelope model produced a larger number of these electrons by a factor of about 30%. Discrepancies of the secondary electron spectrum between Livermore and Penelope were more obvious at energies of less than 1 keV and reached the factor of about 30% at energies between 250 eV and 1 keV. The RDDs for Livermore and Penelope models were very similar with small variations within the first 6 nm from NP surface by a factor of 10%. In addition, neither the G-value nor the REF was affected by the choice of physical interaction models with the same energy cut-off. This work illustrated the similarity of the Livermore and Penelope models (within 15%) available in Geant4 for future simulation studies of GNP enhanced proton therapy with physical, physicochemical, and chemical mechanisms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8810973 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88109732022-02-07 Comparing Geant4 physics models for proton-induced dose deposition and radiolysis enhancement from a gold nanoparticle Rajabpour, Saeed Saberi, Hassan Rasouli, Javad Jabbari, Nasrollah Sci Rep Article Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are materials that make the tumor cells more radiosensitive when irradiated with ionizing radiation. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of different physical interaction models on the dose calculations and radiochemical results around the GNP. By applying the Geant4 Monte Carlo (MC) toolkit, a single 50-nm GNP was simulated, which was immersed in a water phantom and irradiated with 5, 50, and 150 MeV proton beams. The present work assessed various parameters including the secondary electron spectra, secondary photon spectra, radial dose distribution (RDD), dose enhancement factor (DEF), and radiochemical yields around the GNP. The results with an acceptable statistical uncertainty of less than 1% indicated that low-energy electrons deriving from the ionization process formed a significant part of the total number of secondary particles generated in the presence of GNP; the Penelope model produced a larger number of these electrons by a factor of about 30%. Discrepancies of the secondary electron spectrum between Livermore and Penelope were more obvious at energies of less than 1 keV and reached the factor of about 30% at energies between 250 eV and 1 keV. The RDDs for Livermore and Penelope models were very similar with small variations within the first 6 nm from NP surface by a factor of 10%. In addition, neither the G-value nor the REF was affected by the choice of physical interaction models with the same energy cut-off. This work illustrated the similarity of the Livermore and Penelope models (within 15%) available in Geant4 for future simulation studies of GNP enhanced proton therapy with physical, physicochemical, and chemical mechanisms. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8810973/ /pubmed/35110613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05748-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Rajabpour, Saeed Saberi, Hassan Rasouli, Javad Jabbari, Nasrollah Comparing Geant4 physics models for proton-induced dose deposition and radiolysis enhancement from a gold nanoparticle |
title | Comparing Geant4 physics models for proton-induced dose deposition and radiolysis enhancement from a gold nanoparticle |
title_full | Comparing Geant4 physics models for proton-induced dose deposition and radiolysis enhancement from a gold nanoparticle |
title_fullStr | Comparing Geant4 physics models for proton-induced dose deposition and radiolysis enhancement from a gold nanoparticle |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Geant4 physics models for proton-induced dose deposition and radiolysis enhancement from a gold nanoparticle |
title_short | Comparing Geant4 physics models for proton-induced dose deposition and radiolysis enhancement from a gold nanoparticle |
title_sort | comparing geant4 physics models for proton-induced dose deposition and radiolysis enhancement from a gold nanoparticle |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8810973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35110613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05748-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajabpoursaeed comparinggeant4physicsmodelsforprotoninduceddosedepositionandradiolysisenhancementfromagoldnanoparticle AT saberihassan comparinggeant4physicsmodelsforprotoninduceddosedepositionandradiolysisenhancementfromagoldnanoparticle AT rasoulijavad comparinggeant4physicsmodelsforprotoninduceddosedepositionandradiolysisenhancementfromagoldnanoparticle AT jabbarinasrollah comparinggeant4physicsmodelsforprotoninduceddosedepositionandradiolysisenhancementfromagoldnanoparticle |