Cargando…
Automated Detection of Candidate Subjects With Cerebral Microbleeds Using Machine Learning
Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) appear as small, circular, well defined hypointense lesions of a few mm in size on T2(*)-weighted gradient recalled echo (T2(*)-GRE) images and appear enhanced on susceptibility weighted images (SWI). Due to their small size, contrast variations and other mimics (e.g., bl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8811357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126079 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2021.777828 |
_version_ | 1784644416786399232 |
---|---|
author | Sundaresan, Vaanathi Arthofer, Christoph Zamboni, Giovanna Dineen, Robert A. Rothwell, Peter M. Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N. Auer, Dorothee P. Tozer, Daniel J. Markus, Hugh S. Miller, Karla L. Dragonu, Iulius Sprigg, Nikola Alfaro-Almagro, Fidel Jenkinson, Mark Griffanti, Ludovica |
author_facet | Sundaresan, Vaanathi Arthofer, Christoph Zamboni, Giovanna Dineen, Robert A. Rothwell, Peter M. Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N. Auer, Dorothee P. Tozer, Daniel J. Markus, Hugh S. Miller, Karla L. Dragonu, Iulius Sprigg, Nikola Alfaro-Almagro, Fidel Jenkinson, Mark Griffanti, Ludovica |
author_sort | Sundaresan, Vaanathi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) appear as small, circular, well defined hypointense lesions of a few mm in size on T2(*)-weighted gradient recalled echo (T2(*)-GRE) images and appear enhanced on susceptibility weighted images (SWI). Due to their small size, contrast variations and other mimics (e.g., blood vessels), CMBs are highly challenging to detect automatically. In large datasets (e.g., the UK Biobank dataset), exhaustively labelling CMBs manually is difficult and time consuming. Hence it would be useful to preselect candidate CMB subjects in order to focus on those for manual labelling, which is essential for training and testing automated CMB detection tools on these datasets. In this work, we aim to detect CMB candidate subjects from a larger dataset, UK Biobank, using a machine learning-based, computationally light pipeline. For our evaluation, we used 3 different datasets, with different intensity characteristics, acquired with different scanners. They include the UK Biobank dataset and two clinical datasets with different pathological conditions. We developed and evaluated our pipelines on different types of images, consisting of SWI or GRE images. We also used the UK Biobank dataset to compare our approach with alternative CMB preselection methods using non-imaging factors and/or imaging data. Finally, we evaluated the pipeline's generalisability across datasets. Our method provided subject-level detection accuracy > 80% on all the datasets (within-dataset results), and showed good generalisability across datasets, providing a consistent accuracy of over 80%, even when evaluated across different modalities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8811357 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88113572022-02-04 Automated Detection of Candidate Subjects With Cerebral Microbleeds Using Machine Learning Sundaresan, Vaanathi Arthofer, Christoph Zamboni, Giovanna Dineen, Robert A. Rothwell, Peter M. Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N. Auer, Dorothee P. Tozer, Daniel J. Markus, Hugh S. Miller, Karla L. Dragonu, Iulius Sprigg, Nikola Alfaro-Almagro, Fidel Jenkinson, Mark Griffanti, Ludovica Front Neuroinform Neuroscience Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) appear as small, circular, well defined hypointense lesions of a few mm in size on T2(*)-weighted gradient recalled echo (T2(*)-GRE) images and appear enhanced on susceptibility weighted images (SWI). Due to their small size, contrast variations and other mimics (e.g., blood vessels), CMBs are highly challenging to detect automatically. In large datasets (e.g., the UK Biobank dataset), exhaustively labelling CMBs manually is difficult and time consuming. Hence it would be useful to preselect candidate CMB subjects in order to focus on those for manual labelling, which is essential for training and testing automated CMB detection tools on these datasets. In this work, we aim to detect CMB candidate subjects from a larger dataset, UK Biobank, using a machine learning-based, computationally light pipeline. For our evaluation, we used 3 different datasets, with different intensity characteristics, acquired with different scanners. They include the UK Biobank dataset and two clinical datasets with different pathological conditions. We developed and evaluated our pipelines on different types of images, consisting of SWI or GRE images. We also used the UK Biobank dataset to compare our approach with alternative CMB preselection methods using non-imaging factors and/or imaging data. Finally, we evaluated the pipeline's generalisability across datasets. Our method provided subject-level detection accuracy > 80% on all the datasets (within-dataset results), and showed good generalisability across datasets, providing a consistent accuracy of over 80%, even when evaluated across different modalities. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8811357/ /pubmed/35126079 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2021.777828 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sundaresan, Arthofer, Zamboni, Dineen, Rothwell, Sotiropoulos, Auer, Tozer, Markus, Miller, Dragonu, Sprigg, Alfaro-Almagro, Jenkinson and Griffanti. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Sundaresan, Vaanathi Arthofer, Christoph Zamboni, Giovanna Dineen, Robert A. Rothwell, Peter M. Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N. Auer, Dorothee P. Tozer, Daniel J. Markus, Hugh S. Miller, Karla L. Dragonu, Iulius Sprigg, Nikola Alfaro-Almagro, Fidel Jenkinson, Mark Griffanti, Ludovica Automated Detection of Candidate Subjects With Cerebral Microbleeds Using Machine Learning |
title | Automated Detection of Candidate Subjects With Cerebral Microbleeds Using Machine Learning |
title_full | Automated Detection of Candidate Subjects With Cerebral Microbleeds Using Machine Learning |
title_fullStr | Automated Detection of Candidate Subjects With Cerebral Microbleeds Using Machine Learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated Detection of Candidate Subjects With Cerebral Microbleeds Using Machine Learning |
title_short | Automated Detection of Candidate Subjects With Cerebral Microbleeds Using Machine Learning |
title_sort | automated detection of candidate subjects with cerebral microbleeds using machine learning |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8811357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126079 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2021.777828 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sundaresanvaanathi automateddetectionofcandidatesubjectswithcerebralmicrobleedsusingmachinelearning AT arthoferchristoph automateddetectionofcandidatesubjectswithcerebralmicrobleedsusingmachinelearning AT zambonigiovanna automateddetectionofcandidatesubjectswithcerebralmicrobleedsusingmachinelearning AT dineenroberta automateddetectionofcandidatesubjectswithcerebralmicrobleedsusingmachinelearning AT rothwellpeterm automateddetectionofcandidatesubjectswithcerebralmicrobleedsusingmachinelearning AT sotiropoulosstamatiosn automateddetectionofcandidatesubjectswithcerebralmicrobleedsusingmachinelearning AT auerdorotheep automateddetectionofcandidatesubjectswithcerebralmicrobleedsusingmachinelearning AT tozerdanielj automateddetectionofcandidatesubjectswithcerebralmicrobleedsusingmachinelearning AT markushughs automateddetectionofcandidatesubjectswithcerebralmicrobleedsusingmachinelearning AT millerkarlal automateddetectionofcandidatesubjectswithcerebralmicrobleedsusingmachinelearning AT dragonuiulius automateddetectionofcandidatesubjectswithcerebralmicrobleedsusingmachinelearning AT spriggnikola automateddetectionofcandidatesubjectswithcerebralmicrobleedsusingmachinelearning AT alfaroalmagrofidel automateddetectionofcandidatesubjectswithcerebralmicrobleedsusingmachinelearning AT jenkinsonmark automateddetectionofcandidatesubjectswithcerebralmicrobleedsusingmachinelearning AT griffantiludovica automateddetectionofcandidatesubjectswithcerebralmicrobleedsusingmachinelearning |