Cargando…

Higher Adenoma Detection Rates at Screening Associated With Lower Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Detection and removal of adenomas reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. The impact of adenoma detection rates (ADRs) on long-term CRC incidence and mortality is unknown. We investigated this using data from the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial. METHODS: Of 167,882 UK...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cross, Amanda J., Robbins, Emma C., Saunders, Brian P., Duffy, Stephen W., Wooldrage, Kate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: W.B. Saunders for the American Gastroenterological Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8811539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32931959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.09.020
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND & AIMS: Detection and removal of adenomas reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. The impact of adenoma detection rates (ADRs) on long-term CRC incidence and mortality is unknown. We investigated this using data from the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial. METHODS: Of 167,882 UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial participants, 40,085 were in the intervention arm and underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy screening at 13 trial centers. The median follow-up time was 17 years. At each center, 1 endoscopist performed most flexible sigmoidoscopies. Multivariable logistic regression was used to classify centers into high-, intermediate-, and low-detector groups based on their main endoscopist’s ADR. We calculated the incidence and mortality of distal and all-site CRC, and estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs using Cox regression. RESULTS: Five, 4, and 4 centers, respectively, were classified into the high-detector, intermediate-detector, and low-detector groups. The average ADRs in each respective group were 15%, 12%, and 9%. Distal CRC incidence and mortality were reduced among those screened compared with controls in all groups, and effects of screening varied significantly by detector ranking, with larger reductions in incidence and mortality seen in the high-detector group (incidence: HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.27–0.42; mortality: HR, 0.22, 95% CI, 0.13–0.37) than in the low-detector group (incidence: HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44–0.68; mortality: HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34–0.86). Similar results were observed for all-site CRC, with larger effects seen in the high-detector (incidence: HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.50–0.67; mortality: HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.39–0.69) than in the low-detector group (incidence: HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61–0.85; mortality: HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51–0.92), although the heterogeneity was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Higher ADRs at screening provide greater long-term protection against CRC incidence and mortality. Isrctn.org, number: ISRCTN28352761.