Cargando…
The Differential Diagnostic Value of the Callosal Angle and Evans Index in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease
BACKGROUND: Callosal Angle (CA) and Evans Index (EI) are considered as imaging biomarkers to diagnose normal-pressure hydrocephalus using traditional MR measurement methods. OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to evaluate the differential diagnostic value of CA and EI in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MC...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Science Publishers
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8811612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33357199 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573405616666201223150004 |
_version_ | 1784644473375948800 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Mengqi Zhang, Jing Zong, Linxiong Fan, Wenping Wang, Botao Chen, Zhiye |
author_facet | Liu, Mengqi Zhang, Jing Zong, Linxiong Fan, Wenping Wang, Botao Chen, Zhiye |
author_sort | Liu, Mengqi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Callosal Angle (CA) and Evans Index (EI) are considered as imaging biomarkers to diagnose normal-pressure hydrocephalus using traditional MR measurement methods. OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to evaluate the differential diagnostic value of CA and EI in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). METHODS: Five-hundred and two subjects were selected from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, which included 168 Normal Controls (NC), 233 MCI and 101 AD patients. The structural MR images were interactively applied with multiplanar reconstruction to measure the CA and EI. RESULTS: CA presented no significant difference among NC, MCI and AD groups (H value = 3.848, P value = 0.146), and EI demonstrated higher value in MCI and AD groups than that in NC groups (P = 0.000 and 0.001, respectively). MCI group had significant larger EI (0.29±0.04) than (0.27±0.03) NC group in 70-75 years old sub-groups. ROC showed that the area under the curve was 0.704±0.045 for NC-MCI in 70-75 years old groups. The correlation analysis indicated that EI was significantly negatively related to MMSE scores of MCI patients (r = -0.131, P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: EI might serve as a screening imaging biomarker for MCI in 70-75 years old patients, and show limited differential value for the diagnosis of AD. CA could present no diagnostic value for MCI and AD in the current study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8811612 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Bentham Science Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88116122022-03-02 The Differential Diagnostic Value of the Callosal Angle and Evans Index in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease Liu, Mengqi Zhang, Jing Zong, Linxiong Fan, Wenping Wang, Botao Chen, Zhiye Curr Med Imaging Article BACKGROUND: Callosal Angle (CA) and Evans Index (EI) are considered as imaging biomarkers to diagnose normal-pressure hydrocephalus using traditional MR measurement methods. OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to evaluate the differential diagnostic value of CA and EI in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). METHODS: Five-hundred and two subjects were selected from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, which included 168 Normal Controls (NC), 233 MCI and 101 AD patients. The structural MR images were interactively applied with multiplanar reconstruction to measure the CA and EI. RESULTS: CA presented no significant difference among NC, MCI and AD groups (H value = 3.848, P value = 0.146), and EI demonstrated higher value in MCI and AD groups than that in NC groups (P = 0.000 and 0.001, respectively). MCI group had significant larger EI (0.29±0.04) than (0.27±0.03) NC group in 70-75 years old sub-groups. ROC showed that the area under the curve was 0.704±0.045 for NC-MCI in 70-75 years old groups. The correlation analysis indicated that EI was significantly negatively related to MMSE scores of MCI patients (r = -0.131, P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: EI might serve as a screening imaging biomarker for MCI in 70-75 years old patients, and show limited differential value for the diagnosis of AD. CA could present no diagnostic value for MCI and AD in the current study. Bentham Science Publishers 2021-01-28 2021-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8811612/ /pubmed/33357199 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573405616666201223150004 Text en © 2021 Bentham Science Publishers https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, Mengqi Zhang, Jing Zong, Linxiong Fan, Wenping Wang, Botao Chen, Zhiye The Differential Diagnostic Value of the Callosal Angle and Evans Index in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease |
title | The Differential Diagnostic Value of the Callosal Angle and Evans Index in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease |
title_full | The Differential Diagnostic Value of the Callosal Angle and Evans Index in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease |
title_fullStr | The Differential Diagnostic Value of the Callosal Angle and Evans Index in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | The Differential Diagnostic Value of the Callosal Angle and Evans Index in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease |
title_short | The Differential Diagnostic Value of the Callosal Angle and Evans Index in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease |
title_sort | differential diagnostic value of the callosal angle and evans index in mild cognitive impairment and alzheimer's disease |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8811612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33357199 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573405616666201223150004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liumengqi thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease AT zhangjing thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease AT zonglinxiong thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease AT fanwenping thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease AT wangbotao thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease AT chenzhiye thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease AT liumengqi differentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease AT zhangjing differentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease AT zonglinxiong differentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease AT fanwenping differentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease AT wangbotao differentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease AT chenzhiye differentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease |