Cargando…

The Differential Diagnostic Value of the Callosal Angle and Evans Index in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease

BACKGROUND: Callosal Angle (CA) and Evans Index (EI) are considered as imaging biomarkers to diagnose normal-pressure hydrocephalus using traditional MR measurement methods. OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to evaluate the differential diagnostic value of CA and EI in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Mengqi, Zhang, Jing, Zong, Linxiong, Fan, Wenping, Wang, Botao, Chen, Zhiye
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Science Publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8811612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33357199
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573405616666201223150004
_version_ 1784644473375948800
author Liu, Mengqi
Zhang, Jing
Zong, Linxiong
Fan, Wenping
Wang, Botao
Chen, Zhiye
author_facet Liu, Mengqi
Zhang, Jing
Zong, Linxiong
Fan, Wenping
Wang, Botao
Chen, Zhiye
author_sort Liu, Mengqi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Callosal Angle (CA) and Evans Index (EI) are considered as imaging biomarkers to diagnose normal-pressure hydrocephalus using traditional MR measurement methods. OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to evaluate the differential diagnostic value of CA and EI in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). METHODS: Five-hundred and two subjects were selected from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, which included 168 Normal Controls (NC), 233 MCI and 101 AD patients. The structural MR images were interactively applied with multiplanar reconstruction to measure the CA and EI. RESULTS: CA presented no significant difference among NC, MCI and AD groups (H value = 3.848, P value = 0.146), and EI demonstrated higher value in MCI and AD groups than that in NC groups (P = 0.000 and 0.001, respectively). MCI group had significant larger EI (0.29±0.04) than (0.27±0.03) NC group in 70-75 years old sub-groups. ROC showed that the area under the curve was 0.704±0.045 for NC-MCI in 70-75 years old groups. The correlation analysis indicated that EI was significantly negatively related to MMSE scores of MCI patients (r = -0.131, P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: EI might serve as a screening imaging biomarker for MCI in 70-75 years old patients, and show limited differential value for the diagnosis of AD. CA could present no diagnostic value for MCI and AD in the current study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8811612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Bentham Science Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88116122022-03-02 The Differential Diagnostic Value of the Callosal Angle and Evans Index in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease Liu, Mengqi Zhang, Jing Zong, Linxiong Fan, Wenping Wang, Botao Chen, Zhiye Curr Med Imaging Article BACKGROUND: Callosal Angle (CA) and Evans Index (EI) are considered as imaging biomarkers to diagnose normal-pressure hydrocephalus using traditional MR measurement methods. OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to evaluate the differential diagnostic value of CA and EI in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). METHODS: Five-hundred and two subjects were selected from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, which included 168 Normal Controls (NC), 233 MCI and 101 AD patients. The structural MR images were interactively applied with multiplanar reconstruction to measure the CA and EI. RESULTS: CA presented no significant difference among NC, MCI and AD groups (H value = 3.848, P value = 0.146), and EI demonstrated higher value in MCI and AD groups than that in NC groups (P = 0.000 and 0.001, respectively). MCI group had significant larger EI (0.29±0.04) than (0.27±0.03) NC group in 70-75 years old sub-groups. ROC showed that the area under the curve was 0.704±0.045 for NC-MCI in 70-75 years old groups. The correlation analysis indicated that EI was significantly negatively related to MMSE scores of MCI patients (r = -0.131, P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: EI might serve as a screening imaging biomarker for MCI in 70-75 years old patients, and show limited differential value for the diagnosis of AD. CA could present no diagnostic value for MCI and AD in the current study. Bentham Science Publishers 2021-01-28 2021-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8811612/ /pubmed/33357199 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573405616666201223150004 Text en © 2021 Bentham Science Publishers https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Mengqi
Zhang, Jing
Zong, Linxiong
Fan, Wenping
Wang, Botao
Chen, Zhiye
The Differential Diagnostic Value of the Callosal Angle and Evans Index in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease
title The Differential Diagnostic Value of the Callosal Angle and Evans Index in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease
title_full The Differential Diagnostic Value of the Callosal Angle and Evans Index in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease
title_fullStr The Differential Diagnostic Value of the Callosal Angle and Evans Index in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease
title_full_unstemmed The Differential Diagnostic Value of the Callosal Angle and Evans Index in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease
title_short The Differential Diagnostic Value of the Callosal Angle and Evans Index in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease
title_sort differential diagnostic value of the callosal angle and evans index in mild cognitive impairment and alzheimer's disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8811612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33357199
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573405616666201223150004
work_keys_str_mv AT liumengqi thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease
AT zhangjing thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease
AT zonglinxiong thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease
AT fanwenping thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease
AT wangbotao thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease
AT chenzhiye thedifferentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease
AT liumengqi differentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease
AT zhangjing differentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease
AT zonglinxiong differentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease
AT fanwenping differentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease
AT wangbotao differentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease
AT chenzhiye differentialdiagnosticvalueofthecallosalangleandevansindexinmildcognitiveimpairmentandalzheimersdisease