Cargando…
“One-step” approach versus “Step-up” approach minimally invasive treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Currently, the minimally invasive “Step-up” surgical strategy is still the main treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN). However, indiscriminate implementation of the “Step-up” strategy can lead to increased numbers of operations and prolonged hospital stay. The “Step-up” approa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8811975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35114931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02116-0 |
_version_ | 1784644548056580096 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Zhi Lu, Jiongdi Cao, Feng Ding, Yixuan Guo, Yulin Mei, Wentong Qu, Yuanxu Liu, Shuang Sun, Haichen Cui, Yeqing Li, Ang Li, Fei |
author_facet | Zheng, Zhi Lu, Jiongdi Cao, Feng Ding, Yixuan Guo, Yulin Mei, Wentong Qu, Yuanxu Liu, Shuang Sun, Haichen Cui, Yeqing Li, Ang Li, Fei |
author_sort | Zheng, Zhi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Currently, the minimally invasive “Step-up” surgical strategy is still the main treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN). However, indiscriminate implementation of the “Step-up” strategy can lead to increased numbers of operations and prolonged hospital stay. The “Step-up” approach is not appropriate for some patients due to unavailabilty of a safe puncture path. Therefore, we developed the “One-step” surgical approach to treat IPN, which is safety. However, there is still a lack of comparison of the short and long-term efficacy between the “One-step” and “Step-up” approach. Consequently, we are conducting this clinical trial to provide a reference for IPN treatment. METHODS: This is an ongoing, single-center, randomized controlled trial of patients with IPN. The total sample size required for the trial (May 2021–December 2023) is approximately 128 patients. Patients will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group (One-step) or a control group (Step-up) at a ratio of 1:1 using the block randomization method. We used the case report forms and electronic data capture systems to obtain demographic information, preoperative laboratory examination, auxiliary examination results, surgery data, postoperative recovery outcomes, and follow-up outcomes. The patients will be followed up for 2 years after surgery. The primary endpoint is a composite endpoint, consisting of mortality and severe complications. The secondary endpoints include the incidence of organ dysfunction, the number of surgical procedures, mortality (the incidence of death in hospital and deaths within 30 days of discharge), hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, hospitalization costs, perioperative inflammatory marker changes, and short-and long-term complications. DISCUSSION: Compared with the “Step-up,” the “One-step” minimally invasive surgery can significantly reduce the number of operations, reduce the length of hospital stay and hospitalization costs without increasing the incidence of composite endpoint events, and has better short- and long-term efficacy and safety. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference in perioperative complications and mortality between “Step-up” and “One-step”. This study will assist with the formulation of an effective and scientific “One-step” minimally invasive treatment strategy for IPN, and an understanding of this technique will facilitate clinical decision-making for IPN. Trial Registration ChiCTR2100044348. Trial status: Ongoing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8811975 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88119752022-02-03 “One-step” approach versus “Step-up” approach minimally invasive treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial Zheng, Zhi Lu, Jiongdi Cao, Feng Ding, Yixuan Guo, Yulin Mei, Wentong Qu, Yuanxu Liu, Shuang Sun, Haichen Cui, Yeqing Li, Ang Li, Fei BMC Gastroenterol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Currently, the minimally invasive “Step-up” surgical strategy is still the main treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN). However, indiscriminate implementation of the “Step-up” strategy can lead to increased numbers of operations and prolonged hospital stay. The “Step-up” approach is not appropriate for some patients due to unavailabilty of a safe puncture path. Therefore, we developed the “One-step” surgical approach to treat IPN, which is safety. However, there is still a lack of comparison of the short and long-term efficacy between the “One-step” and “Step-up” approach. Consequently, we are conducting this clinical trial to provide a reference for IPN treatment. METHODS: This is an ongoing, single-center, randomized controlled trial of patients with IPN. The total sample size required for the trial (May 2021–December 2023) is approximately 128 patients. Patients will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group (One-step) or a control group (Step-up) at a ratio of 1:1 using the block randomization method. We used the case report forms and electronic data capture systems to obtain demographic information, preoperative laboratory examination, auxiliary examination results, surgery data, postoperative recovery outcomes, and follow-up outcomes. The patients will be followed up for 2 years after surgery. The primary endpoint is a composite endpoint, consisting of mortality and severe complications. The secondary endpoints include the incidence of organ dysfunction, the number of surgical procedures, mortality (the incidence of death in hospital and deaths within 30 days of discharge), hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, hospitalization costs, perioperative inflammatory marker changes, and short-and long-term complications. DISCUSSION: Compared with the “Step-up,” the “One-step” minimally invasive surgery can significantly reduce the number of operations, reduce the length of hospital stay and hospitalization costs without increasing the incidence of composite endpoint events, and has better short- and long-term efficacy and safety. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference in perioperative complications and mortality between “Step-up” and “One-step”. This study will assist with the formulation of an effective and scientific “One-step” minimally invasive treatment strategy for IPN, and an understanding of this technique will facilitate clinical decision-making for IPN. Trial Registration ChiCTR2100044348. Trial status: Ongoing. BioMed Central 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8811975/ /pubmed/35114931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02116-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Zheng, Zhi Lu, Jiongdi Cao, Feng Ding, Yixuan Guo, Yulin Mei, Wentong Qu, Yuanxu Liu, Shuang Sun, Haichen Cui, Yeqing Li, Ang Li, Fei “One-step” approach versus “Step-up” approach minimally invasive treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial |
title | “One-step” approach versus “Step-up” approach minimally invasive treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial |
title_full | “One-step” approach versus “Step-up” approach minimally invasive treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | “One-step” approach versus “Step-up” approach minimally invasive treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | “One-step” approach versus “Step-up” approach minimally invasive treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial |
title_short | “One-step” approach versus “Step-up” approach minimally invasive treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | “one-step” approach versus “step-up” approach minimally invasive treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8811975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35114931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02116-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengzhi onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lujiongdi onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT caofeng onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dingyixuan onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT guoyulin onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT meiwentong onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT quyuanxu onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liushuang onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sunhaichen onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cuiyeqing onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liang onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lifei onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial |