Cargando…

“One-step” approach versus “Step-up” approach minimally invasive treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Currently, the minimally invasive “Step-up” surgical strategy is still the main treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN). However, indiscriminate implementation of the “Step-up” strategy can lead to increased numbers of operations and prolonged hospital stay. The “Step-up” approa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Zhi, Lu, Jiongdi, Cao, Feng, Ding, Yixuan, Guo, Yulin, Mei, Wentong, Qu, Yuanxu, Liu, Shuang, Sun, Haichen, Cui, Yeqing, Li, Ang, Li, Fei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8811975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35114931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02116-0
_version_ 1784644548056580096
author Zheng, Zhi
Lu, Jiongdi
Cao, Feng
Ding, Yixuan
Guo, Yulin
Mei, Wentong
Qu, Yuanxu
Liu, Shuang
Sun, Haichen
Cui, Yeqing
Li, Ang
Li, Fei
author_facet Zheng, Zhi
Lu, Jiongdi
Cao, Feng
Ding, Yixuan
Guo, Yulin
Mei, Wentong
Qu, Yuanxu
Liu, Shuang
Sun, Haichen
Cui, Yeqing
Li, Ang
Li, Fei
author_sort Zheng, Zhi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, the minimally invasive “Step-up” surgical strategy is still the main treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN). However, indiscriminate implementation of the “Step-up” strategy can lead to increased numbers of operations and prolonged hospital stay. The “Step-up” approach is not appropriate for some patients due to unavailabilty of a safe puncture path. Therefore, we developed the “One-step” surgical approach to treat IPN, which is safety. However, there is still a lack of comparison of the short and long-term efficacy between the “One-step” and “Step-up” approach. Consequently, we are conducting this clinical trial to provide a reference for IPN treatment. METHODS: This is an ongoing, single-center, randomized controlled trial of patients with IPN. The total sample size required for the trial (May 2021–December 2023) is approximately 128 patients. Patients will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group (One-step) or a control group (Step-up) at a ratio of 1:1 using the block randomization method. We used the case report forms and electronic data capture systems to obtain demographic information, preoperative laboratory examination, auxiliary examination results, surgery data, postoperative recovery outcomes, and follow-up outcomes. The patients will be followed up for 2 years after surgery. The primary endpoint is a composite endpoint, consisting of mortality and severe complications. The secondary endpoints include the incidence of organ dysfunction, the number of surgical procedures, mortality (the incidence of death in hospital and deaths within 30 days of discharge), hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, hospitalization costs, perioperative inflammatory marker changes, and short-and long-term complications. DISCUSSION: Compared with the “Step-up,” the “One-step” minimally invasive surgery can significantly reduce the number of operations, reduce the length of hospital stay and hospitalization costs without increasing the incidence of composite endpoint events, and has better short- and long-term efficacy and safety. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference in perioperative complications and mortality between “Step-up” and “One-step”. This study will assist with the formulation of an effective and scientific “One-step” minimally invasive treatment strategy for IPN, and an understanding of this technique will facilitate clinical decision-making for IPN. Trial Registration ChiCTR2100044348. Trial status: Ongoing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8811975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88119752022-02-03 “One-step” approach versus “Step-up” approach minimally invasive treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial Zheng, Zhi Lu, Jiongdi Cao, Feng Ding, Yixuan Guo, Yulin Mei, Wentong Qu, Yuanxu Liu, Shuang Sun, Haichen Cui, Yeqing Li, Ang Li, Fei BMC Gastroenterol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Currently, the minimally invasive “Step-up” surgical strategy is still the main treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN). However, indiscriminate implementation of the “Step-up” strategy can lead to increased numbers of operations and prolonged hospital stay. The “Step-up” approach is not appropriate for some patients due to unavailabilty of a safe puncture path. Therefore, we developed the “One-step” surgical approach to treat IPN, which is safety. However, there is still a lack of comparison of the short and long-term efficacy between the “One-step” and “Step-up” approach. Consequently, we are conducting this clinical trial to provide a reference for IPN treatment. METHODS: This is an ongoing, single-center, randomized controlled trial of patients with IPN. The total sample size required for the trial (May 2021–December 2023) is approximately 128 patients. Patients will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group (One-step) or a control group (Step-up) at a ratio of 1:1 using the block randomization method. We used the case report forms and electronic data capture systems to obtain demographic information, preoperative laboratory examination, auxiliary examination results, surgery data, postoperative recovery outcomes, and follow-up outcomes. The patients will be followed up for 2 years after surgery. The primary endpoint is a composite endpoint, consisting of mortality and severe complications. The secondary endpoints include the incidence of organ dysfunction, the number of surgical procedures, mortality (the incidence of death in hospital and deaths within 30 days of discharge), hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, hospitalization costs, perioperative inflammatory marker changes, and short-and long-term complications. DISCUSSION: Compared with the “Step-up,” the “One-step” minimally invasive surgery can significantly reduce the number of operations, reduce the length of hospital stay and hospitalization costs without increasing the incidence of composite endpoint events, and has better short- and long-term efficacy and safety. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference in perioperative complications and mortality between “Step-up” and “One-step”. This study will assist with the formulation of an effective and scientific “One-step” minimally invasive treatment strategy for IPN, and an understanding of this technique will facilitate clinical decision-making for IPN. Trial Registration ChiCTR2100044348. Trial status: Ongoing. BioMed Central 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8811975/ /pubmed/35114931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02116-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Zheng, Zhi
Lu, Jiongdi
Cao, Feng
Ding, Yixuan
Guo, Yulin
Mei, Wentong
Qu, Yuanxu
Liu, Shuang
Sun, Haichen
Cui, Yeqing
Li, Ang
Li, Fei
“One-step” approach versus “Step-up” approach minimally invasive treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial
title “One-step” approach versus “Step-up” approach minimally invasive treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_full “One-step” approach versus “Step-up” approach minimally invasive treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr “One-step” approach versus “Step-up” approach minimally invasive treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed “One-step” approach versus “Step-up” approach minimally invasive treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_short “One-step” approach versus “Step-up” approach minimally invasive treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_sort “one-step” approach versus “step-up” approach minimally invasive treatment for infected pancreatic necrosis: a study protocol for a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8811975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35114931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02116-0
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengzhi onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lujiongdi onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT caofeng onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dingyixuan onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guoyulin onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT meiwentong onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT quyuanxu onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liushuang onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sunhaichen onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cuiyeqing onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liang onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lifei onestepapproachversusstepupapproachminimallyinvasivetreatmentforinfectedpancreaticnecrosisastudyprotocolforasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial