Cargando…
Implementation of an in situ simulation-based training adapted from Morbidity and Mortality conference cases: effect on the occurrence of adverse events—study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Morbidity and Mortality conference provides the necessary improvement measures for patient safety. However, they are an underused resource mainly because the conclusions to be drawn from the discussion and their implications for practice are not always well integrated by inpatient care t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35109900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06040-2 |
_version_ | 1784644593146396672 |
---|---|
author | Michel, Nicolas Bui-Xuan, Bernard Bapteste, Lionel Rimmele, Thomas Lilot, Marc Chollet, François Favre, Hélène Duclos, Antoine Michel, Philippe |
author_facet | Michel, Nicolas Bui-Xuan, Bernard Bapteste, Lionel Rimmele, Thomas Lilot, Marc Chollet, François Favre, Hélène Duclos, Antoine Michel, Philippe |
author_sort | Michel, Nicolas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Morbidity and Mortality conference provides the necessary improvement measures for patient safety. However, they are an underused resource mainly because the conclusions to be drawn from the discussion and their implications for practice are not always well integrated by inpatient care teams. We therefore propose in this study two interventions to optimise their effectiveness: a passive feedback with wide dissemination by e-mail and/or on paper of the results of the Morbidity and Mortality conference to inpatient care teams and an active feedback with in situ inter-professional simulation-training programme in which scenarios will be based on cases studied in Morbidity and Mortality conference. In the present study, we hypothesise that the greatest reduction the occurrence of adverse event will be in the active feedback arm. METHODS: A cluster randomised controlled study will be performed at four study sites. The unit of randomisation is wards within the study sites. Fifteen wards will be randomly assigned to passive feedback, active feedback, or a standard MMC (control arm). Passive feedback and active feedback arms will be compared to standard arm in terms of occurrence of adverse events. The trigger tool methodology used to identify adverse events is a retrospective review of inpatient records using “triggers”: an adverse event is defined as a patient’s stay with at least one positive trigger. DISCUSSION: The in situ simulation training based on cases processed in Morbidity and Mortality conference is built according to the main topics identified for the successful implementation of healthcare simulation in patient safety programmes: technical skills, nontechnical skills, assessment, effectiveness, and system probing. The in situ simulation-training programme conducted as part of the study has the potential to improve patient safety during hospitalisation. We therefore expect the greatest reduction in the occurrence of adverse events in patients hospitalised in the active feedback arm. This expected result would have a direct impact on patient safety and would place in situ simulation at the highest level of the Kirkpatrick model. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02771613. Registered on May 12, 2016. All items from the WHO Trial Registration Data Set can be found within the protocol. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06040-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8812171 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88121712022-02-03 Implementation of an in situ simulation-based training adapted from Morbidity and Mortality conference cases: effect on the occurrence of adverse events—study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial Michel, Nicolas Bui-Xuan, Bernard Bapteste, Lionel Rimmele, Thomas Lilot, Marc Chollet, François Favre, Hélène Duclos, Antoine Michel, Philippe Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Morbidity and Mortality conference provides the necessary improvement measures for patient safety. However, they are an underused resource mainly because the conclusions to be drawn from the discussion and their implications for practice are not always well integrated by inpatient care teams. We therefore propose in this study two interventions to optimise their effectiveness: a passive feedback with wide dissemination by e-mail and/or on paper of the results of the Morbidity and Mortality conference to inpatient care teams and an active feedback with in situ inter-professional simulation-training programme in which scenarios will be based on cases studied in Morbidity and Mortality conference. In the present study, we hypothesise that the greatest reduction the occurrence of adverse event will be in the active feedback arm. METHODS: A cluster randomised controlled study will be performed at four study sites. The unit of randomisation is wards within the study sites. Fifteen wards will be randomly assigned to passive feedback, active feedback, or a standard MMC (control arm). Passive feedback and active feedback arms will be compared to standard arm in terms of occurrence of adverse events. The trigger tool methodology used to identify adverse events is a retrospective review of inpatient records using “triggers”: an adverse event is defined as a patient’s stay with at least one positive trigger. DISCUSSION: The in situ simulation training based on cases processed in Morbidity and Mortality conference is built according to the main topics identified for the successful implementation of healthcare simulation in patient safety programmes: technical skills, nontechnical skills, assessment, effectiveness, and system probing. The in situ simulation-training programme conducted as part of the study has the potential to improve patient safety during hospitalisation. We therefore expect the greatest reduction in the occurrence of adverse events in patients hospitalised in the active feedback arm. This expected result would have a direct impact on patient safety and would place in situ simulation at the highest level of the Kirkpatrick model. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02771613. Registered on May 12, 2016. All items from the WHO Trial Registration Data Set can be found within the protocol. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06040-2. BioMed Central 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8812171/ /pubmed/35109900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06040-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Michel, Nicolas Bui-Xuan, Bernard Bapteste, Lionel Rimmele, Thomas Lilot, Marc Chollet, François Favre, Hélène Duclos, Antoine Michel, Philippe Implementation of an in situ simulation-based training adapted from Morbidity and Mortality conference cases: effect on the occurrence of adverse events—study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial |
title | Implementation of an in situ simulation-based training adapted from Morbidity and Mortality conference cases: effect on the occurrence of adverse events—study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Implementation of an in situ simulation-based training adapted from Morbidity and Mortality conference cases: effect on the occurrence of adverse events—study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Implementation of an in situ simulation-based training adapted from Morbidity and Mortality conference cases: effect on the occurrence of adverse events—study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of an in situ simulation-based training adapted from Morbidity and Mortality conference cases: effect on the occurrence of adverse events—study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Implementation of an in situ simulation-based training adapted from Morbidity and Mortality conference cases: effect on the occurrence of adverse events—study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | implementation of an in situ simulation-based training adapted from morbidity and mortality conference cases: effect on the occurrence of adverse events—study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35109900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06040-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT michelnicolas implementationofaninsitusimulationbasedtrainingadaptedfrommorbidityandmortalityconferencecaseseffectontheoccurrenceofadverseeventsstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT buixuanbernard implementationofaninsitusimulationbasedtrainingadaptedfrommorbidityandmortalityconferencecaseseffectontheoccurrenceofadverseeventsstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT baptestelionel implementationofaninsitusimulationbasedtrainingadaptedfrommorbidityandmortalityconferencecaseseffectontheoccurrenceofadverseeventsstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT rimmelethomas implementationofaninsitusimulationbasedtrainingadaptedfrommorbidityandmortalityconferencecaseseffectontheoccurrenceofadverseeventsstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lilotmarc implementationofaninsitusimulationbasedtrainingadaptedfrommorbidityandmortalityconferencecaseseffectontheoccurrenceofadverseeventsstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cholletfrancois implementationofaninsitusimulationbasedtrainingadaptedfrommorbidityandmortalityconferencecaseseffectontheoccurrenceofadverseeventsstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT favrehelene implementationofaninsitusimulationbasedtrainingadaptedfrommorbidityandmortalityconferencecaseseffectontheoccurrenceofadverseeventsstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT duclosantoine implementationofaninsitusimulationbasedtrainingadaptedfrommorbidityandmortalityconferencecaseseffectontheoccurrenceofadverseeventsstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT michelphilippe implementationofaninsitusimulationbasedtrainingadaptedfrommorbidityandmortalityconferencecaseseffectontheoccurrenceofadverseeventsstudyprotocolofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial |