Cargando…
Litter Detection with Deep Learning: A Comparative Study
Pollution in the form of litter in the natural environment is one of the great challenges of our times. Automated litter detection can help assess waste occurrences in the environment. Different machine learning solutions have been explored to develop litter detection tools, thereby supporting resea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35062507 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22020548 |
_version_ | 1784644615438073856 |
---|---|
author | Córdova, Manuel Pinto, Allan Hellevik, Christina Carrozzo Alaliyat, Saleh Abdel-Afou Hameed, Ibrahim A. Pedrini, Helio Torres, Ricardo da S. |
author_facet | Córdova, Manuel Pinto, Allan Hellevik, Christina Carrozzo Alaliyat, Saleh Abdel-Afou Hameed, Ibrahim A. Pedrini, Helio Torres, Ricardo da S. |
author_sort | Córdova, Manuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pollution in the form of litter in the natural environment is one of the great challenges of our times. Automated litter detection can help assess waste occurrences in the environment. Different machine learning solutions have been explored to develop litter detection tools, thereby supporting research, citizen science, and volunteer clean-up initiatives. However, to the best of our knowledge, no work has investigated the performance of state-of-the-art deep learning object detection approaches in the context of litter detection. In particular, no studies have focused on the assessment of those methods aiming their use in devices with low processing capabilities, e.g., mobile phones, typically employed in citizen science activities. In this paper, we fill this literature gap. We performed a comparative study involving state-of-the-art CNN architectures (e.g., Faster RCNN, Mask-RCNN, EfficientDet, RetinaNet and YOLO-v5), two litter image datasets and a smartphone. We also introduce a new dataset for litter detection, named PlastOPol, composed of 2418 images and 5300 annotations. The experimental results demonstrate that object detectors based on the YOLO family are promising for the construction of litter detection solutions, with superior performance in terms of detection accuracy, processing time, and memory footprint. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8812282 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88122822022-02-04 Litter Detection with Deep Learning: A Comparative Study Córdova, Manuel Pinto, Allan Hellevik, Christina Carrozzo Alaliyat, Saleh Abdel-Afou Hameed, Ibrahim A. Pedrini, Helio Torres, Ricardo da S. Sensors (Basel) Article Pollution in the form of litter in the natural environment is one of the great challenges of our times. Automated litter detection can help assess waste occurrences in the environment. Different machine learning solutions have been explored to develop litter detection tools, thereby supporting research, citizen science, and volunteer clean-up initiatives. However, to the best of our knowledge, no work has investigated the performance of state-of-the-art deep learning object detection approaches in the context of litter detection. In particular, no studies have focused on the assessment of those methods aiming their use in devices with low processing capabilities, e.g., mobile phones, typically employed in citizen science activities. In this paper, we fill this literature gap. We performed a comparative study involving state-of-the-art CNN architectures (e.g., Faster RCNN, Mask-RCNN, EfficientDet, RetinaNet and YOLO-v5), two litter image datasets and a smartphone. We also introduce a new dataset for litter detection, named PlastOPol, composed of 2418 images and 5300 annotations. The experimental results demonstrate that object detectors based on the YOLO family are promising for the construction of litter detection solutions, with superior performance in terms of detection accuracy, processing time, and memory footprint. MDPI 2022-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8812282/ /pubmed/35062507 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22020548 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Córdova, Manuel Pinto, Allan Hellevik, Christina Carrozzo Alaliyat, Saleh Abdel-Afou Hameed, Ibrahim A. Pedrini, Helio Torres, Ricardo da S. Litter Detection with Deep Learning: A Comparative Study |
title | Litter Detection with Deep Learning: A Comparative Study |
title_full | Litter Detection with Deep Learning: A Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | Litter Detection with Deep Learning: A Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Litter Detection with Deep Learning: A Comparative Study |
title_short | Litter Detection with Deep Learning: A Comparative Study |
title_sort | litter detection with deep learning: a comparative study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35062507 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22020548 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cordovamanuel litterdetectionwithdeeplearningacomparativestudy AT pintoallan litterdetectionwithdeeplearningacomparativestudy AT hellevikchristinacarrozzo litterdetectionwithdeeplearningacomparativestudy AT alaliyatsalehabdelafou litterdetectionwithdeeplearningacomparativestudy AT hameedibrahima litterdetectionwithdeeplearningacomparativestudy AT pedrinihelio litterdetectionwithdeeplearningacomparativestudy AT torresricardodas litterdetectionwithdeeplearningacomparativestudy |