Cargando…

Study design flaws and statistical challenges in evaluating fertility treatments

Health interventions should be tested before being introduced into clinical practice, to find out whether they work and whether they are harmful. However, research studies will only provide reliable answers to these questions if they are appropriately designed and analysed. But these are not trivial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilkinson, Jack, Stocking, Katie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/RAF-21-0015
_version_ 1784644645089705984
author Wilkinson, Jack
Stocking, Katie
author_facet Wilkinson, Jack
Stocking, Katie
author_sort Wilkinson, Jack
collection PubMed
description Health interventions should be tested before being introduced into clinical practice, to find out whether they work and whether they are harmful. However, research studies will only provide reliable answers to these questions if they are appropriately designed and analysed. But these are not trivial tasks. We review some methodological challenges that arise when evaluating fertility interventions and explain the implications for a non-statistical audience. These include flexibility in outcomes and analyses; use of surrogate outcomes instead of live birth; use of inappropriate denominators; evaluating cumulative outcomes and time to live birth; allowing each patient or couple to contribute to a research study more than once. We highlight recurring errors and present solutions. We conclude by highlighting the importance of collaboration between clinical and methodological experts, as well as people with experience of subfertility, for realising high-quality research. LAY SUMMARY: We do research to find out whether fertility treatments are beneficial and to make sure they don’t cause harm. However, research will only provide reliable answers if it is done properly. It is not unusual for researchers to make mistakes when they are designing research studies and analysing the data that we get from them. In this review, we describe some of the mistakes people make when they do research about fertility treatments and explain how to avoid them. These include challenges which arise due to the large number of things that can be measured and reported when looking to see if fertility treatments work; failure to check whether the treatment increases the number of live births; failing to include all study participants in calculations;challenges in studies where participants may have more than one treatment attempt. We conclude by highlighting the importance of collaboration between clinical and methodological experts, as well as people with experience of fertility problems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8812412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Bioscientifica Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88124122022-02-04 Study design flaws and statistical challenges in evaluating fertility treatments Wilkinson, Jack Stocking, Katie Reprod Fertil Commentary Health interventions should be tested before being introduced into clinical practice, to find out whether they work and whether they are harmful. However, research studies will only provide reliable answers to these questions if they are appropriately designed and analysed. But these are not trivial tasks. We review some methodological challenges that arise when evaluating fertility interventions and explain the implications for a non-statistical audience. These include flexibility in outcomes and analyses; use of surrogate outcomes instead of live birth; use of inappropriate denominators; evaluating cumulative outcomes and time to live birth; allowing each patient or couple to contribute to a research study more than once. We highlight recurring errors and present solutions. We conclude by highlighting the importance of collaboration between clinical and methodological experts, as well as people with experience of subfertility, for realising high-quality research. LAY SUMMARY: We do research to find out whether fertility treatments are beneficial and to make sure they don’t cause harm. However, research will only provide reliable answers if it is done properly. It is not unusual for researchers to make mistakes when they are designing research studies and analysing the data that we get from them. In this review, we describe some of the mistakes people make when they do research about fertility treatments and explain how to avoid them. These include challenges which arise due to the large number of things that can be measured and reported when looking to see if fertility treatments work; failure to check whether the treatment increases the number of live births; failing to include all study participants in calculations;challenges in studies where participants may have more than one treatment attempt. We conclude by highlighting the importance of collaboration between clinical and methodological experts, as well as people with experience of fertility problems. Bioscientifica Ltd 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8812412/ /pubmed/35128452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/RAF-21-0015 Text en © The authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Commentary
Wilkinson, Jack
Stocking, Katie
Study design flaws and statistical challenges in evaluating fertility treatments
title Study design flaws and statistical challenges in evaluating fertility treatments
title_full Study design flaws and statistical challenges in evaluating fertility treatments
title_fullStr Study design flaws and statistical challenges in evaluating fertility treatments
title_full_unstemmed Study design flaws and statistical challenges in evaluating fertility treatments
title_short Study design flaws and statistical challenges in evaluating fertility treatments
title_sort study design flaws and statistical challenges in evaluating fertility treatments
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/RAF-21-0015
work_keys_str_mv AT wilkinsonjack studydesignflawsandstatisticalchallengesinevaluatingfertilitytreatments
AT stockingkatie studydesignflawsandstatisticalchallengesinevaluatingfertilitytreatments