Cargando…

Is pre-freeze sperm preparation more advantageous than post-freeze?

Human sperm cryopreservation is characterised to this day by sub-optimal success rates. Interestingly, a traditional approach to improving post-thaw outcome has been to integrate standard sperm preparation techniques into freezing protocols as a means of selecting sperm with the highest fertilisatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Androni, Dimitra Apostolia, Dodds, Sophie, Tomlinson, Mathew, Maalouf, Walid E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/RAF-20-0041
_version_ 1784644654433566720
author Androni, Dimitra Apostolia
Dodds, Sophie
Tomlinson, Mathew
Maalouf, Walid E
author_facet Androni, Dimitra Apostolia
Dodds, Sophie
Tomlinson, Mathew
Maalouf, Walid E
author_sort Androni, Dimitra Apostolia
collection PubMed
description Human sperm cryopreservation is characterised to this day by sub-optimal success rates. Interestingly, a traditional approach to improving post-thaw outcome has been to integrate standard sperm preparation techniques into freezing protocols as a means of selecting sperm with the highest fertilisation potential prior to insemination. However, no consensus has been reached yet regarding the optimal timing (before or after freezing) of this selection step. Following analysis of a total of 20 human semen samples, which were divided into two aliquots prepared by density gradient centrifugation either before or after freezing, this study demonstrated higher post-thaw total (P < 0.0001), progressively motile (P = 0.005) and vital (P < 0.0001) sperm counts for frozen-prepared semen samples. The present study suggests that direct insemination with frozen-prepared sperm with minimal intervening post-thaw processing might be a more advantageous approach to current clinical practices, particularly for donor and patient intrauterine insemination programmes. Further research into cryopreservation-induced coiled sperm tail morphology is also warranted. LAY SUMMARY: Freezing and storing of sperm in liquid nitrogen (’sperm cryopreservation') is the current method of choice for preserving the fertility of a wide scope of men. Nevertheless, sub-optimal sperm survival is still associated with traditional cryopreservation methods, namely 'slow freezing', and may affect fertility treatment success rates. Interestingly, a widely applied approach for selecting high-quality sperm before treatment has been to incorporate 'sperm preparation' techniques, such as density gradient centrifugation, in slow freezing protocols. There is, however, an ongoing debate regarding which is the optimal timing of this selection step: before or after freezing. In this study, we collected 20 human semen samples which were divided into two portions and subjected to density gradient centrifugation either before or after freezing. Post-thaw semen analyses demonstrated significantly improved sperm counts (P < 0.05) when density gradient centrifugation was performed before freezing, thus suggesting this approach to be more advantageous for current clinical practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8812453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Bioscientifica Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88124532022-02-04 Is pre-freeze sperm preparation more advantageous than post-freeze? Androni, Dimitra Apostolia Dodds, Sophie Tomlinson, Mathew Maalouf, Walid E Reprod Fertil Research Human sperm cryopreservation is characterised to this day by sub-optimal success rates. Interestingly, a traditional approach to improving post-thaw outcome has been to integrate standard sperm preparation techniques into freezing protocols as a means of selecting sperm with the highest fertilisation potential prior to insemination. However, no consensus has been reached yet regarding the optimal timing (before or after freezing) of this selection step. Following analysis of a total of 20 human semen samples, which were divided into two aliquots prepared by density gradient centrifugation either before or after freezing, this study demonstrated higher post-thaw total (P < 0.0001), progressively motile (P = 0.005) and vital (P < 0.0001) sperm counts for frozen-prepared semen samples. The present study suggests that direct insemination with frozen-prepared sperm with minimal intervening post-thaw processing might be a more advantageous approach to current clinical practices, particularly for donor and patient intrauterine insemination programmes. Further research into cryopreservation-induced coiled sperm tail morphology is also warranted. LAY SUMMARY: Freezing and storing of sperm in liquid nitrogen (’sperm cryopreservation') is the current method of choice for preserving the fertility of a wide scope of men. Nevertheless, sub-optimal sperm survival is still associated with traditional cryopreservation methods, namely 'slow freezing', and may affect fertility treatment success rates. Interestingly, a widely applied approach for selecting high-quality sperm before treatment has been to incorporate 'sperm preparation' techniques, such as density gradient centrifugation, in slow freezing protocols. There is, however, an ongoing debate regarding which is the optimal timing of this selection step: before or after freezing. In this study, we collected 20 human semen samples which were divided into two portions and subjected to density gradient centrifugation either before or after freezing. Post-thaw semen analyses demonstrated significantly improved sperm counts (P < 0.05) when density gradient centrifugation was performed before freezing, thus suggesting this approach to be more advantageous for current clinical practices. Bioscientifica Ltd 2021-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8812453/ /pubmed/35128430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/RAF-20-0041 Text en © 2021 The authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research
Androni, Dimitra Apostolia
Dodds, Sophie
Tomlinson, Mathew
Maalouf, Walid E
Is pre-freeze sperm preparation more advantageous than post-freeze?
title Is pre-freeze sperm preparation more advantageous than post-freeze?
title_full Is pre-freeze sperm preparation more advantageous than post-freeze?
title_fullStr Is pre-freeze sperm preparation more advantageous than post-freeze?
title_full_unstemmed Is pre-freeze sperm preparation more advantageous than post-freeze?
title_short Is pre-freeze sperm preparation more advantageous than post-freeze?
title_sort is pre-freeze sperm preparation more advantageous than post-freeze?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/RAF-20-0041
work_keys_str_mv AT andronidimitraapostolia isprefreezespermpreparationmoreadvantageousthanpostfreeze
AT doddssophie isprefreezespermpreparationmoreadvantageousthanpostfreeze
AT tomlinsonmathew isprefreezespermpreparationmoreadvantageousthanpostfreeze
AT maaloufwalide isprefreezespermpreparationmoreadvantageousthanpostfreeze