Cargando…

Usefulness of the additional contrast agents to identify offending nerve root in selective nerve root block

It is hypothesized that if it is confirmed that the pain caused by the injection needle coincides with the lower leg radiating pain(LLRP) that the patient mainly complains of, then the contrast agents may be used less. This study aims to understand if the identification of lancinating identical pain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ko, Sangbong, Nam, Junho, Lee, Jaejun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35118998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025131
_version_ 1784644694886580224
author Ko, Sangbong
Nam, Junho
Lee, Jaejun
author_facet Ko, Sangbong
Nam, Junho
Lee, Jaejun
author_sort Ko, Sangbong
collection PubMed
description It is hypothesized that if it is confirmed that the pain caused by the injection needle coincides with the lower leg radiating pain(LLRP) that the patient mainly complains of, then the contrast agents may be used less. This study aims to understand if the identification of lancinating identical pain in the procedure could replace the use of contrast agents that causes additional pain provocation using control arm of randomized clinical trial. This retrospective study included 165 patients who met exclusion criteria from among patients who underwent Selective nerve root block for the treatment of LLRP. With the identical and lancinating pain confirmed in the same site of the patient, consistent with that of the original symptom, the subjects were divided into 2 groups: 1 without contrast injection (Non-Dye [ND] group; 57 patients) and the other with contrast injection (Dye [D] group; 108 patients). The degree of LLRP in the 2 groups was evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) before injection, 2, 6, and 12 weeks after injection. Functional outcomes were measured using Owestry Disability Index and Rolland-Morris Disability Questionnair, whereas quality of life was measured using Physical component score and Mental component score of Short Form 36 (SF-36) before injection and 3 months after injection. There was no statistically significant difference in the LLRP severity in both groups at all times and no statistical difference in the degree of VAS improvement relative to the before-injection VAS value between the 2 groups at 2 and 6 weeks after injection (all P > .05). At 12 weeks after injection, there was a statistically significant difference, but they were below Minimum Clinical Important Difference, bearing little clinical implications. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in Owestry Disability Index, Rolland-Morris Disability Questionnair, SF-36 Physical component score, and SF-36 Mental component score at every interval (all P > .05). Instead of contrast agent injections that have been used for accurate nerve root identification during Selective Nerve Root Block, the method of merely checking if the needle-induced pain under fluoroscopic imaging is consistent with the LLRP that the patient predominantly experiences shows the same effect in the patient's pain control and functional outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8812628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88126282022-02-18 Usefulness of the additional contrast agents to identify offending nerve root in selective nerve root block Ko, Sangbong Nam, Junho Lee, Jaejun Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 It is hypothesized that if it is confirmed that the pain caused by the injection needle coincides with the lower leg radiating pain(LLRP) that the patient mainly complains of, then the contrast agents may be used less. This study aims to understand if the identification of lancinating identical pain in the procedure could replace the use of contrast agents that causes additional pain provocation using control arm of randomized clinical trial. This retrospective study included 165 patients who met exclusion criteria from among patients who underwent Selective nerve root block for the treatment of LLRP. With the identical and lancinating pain confirmed in the same site of the patient, consistent with that of the original symptom, the subjects were divided into 2 groups: 1 without contrast injection (Non-Dye [ND] group; 57 patients) and the other with contrast injection (Dye [D] group; 108 patients). The degree of LLRP in the 2 groups was evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) before injection, 2, 6, and 12 weeks after injection. Functional outcomes were measured using Owestry Disability Index and Rolland-Morris Disability Questionnair, whereas quality of life was measured using Physical component score and Mental component score of Short Form 36 (SF-36) before injection and 3 months after injection. There was no statistically significant difference in the LLRP severity in both groups at all times and no statistical difference in the degree of VAS improvement relative to the before-injection VAS value between the 2 groups at 2 and 6 weeks after injection (all P > .05). At 12 weeks after injection, there was a statistically significant difference, but they were below Minimum Clinical Important Difference, bearing little clinical implications. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in Owestry Disability Index, Rolland-Morris Disability Questionnair, SF-36 Physical component score, and SF-36 Mental component score at every interval (all P > .05). Instead of contrast agent injections that have been used for accurate nerve root identification during Selective Nerve Root Block, the method of merely checking if the needle-induced pain under fluoroscopic imaging is consistent with the LLRP that the patient predominantly experiences shows the same effect in the patient's pain control and functional outcome. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8812628/ /pubmed/35118998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025131 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 7100
Ko, Sangbong
Nam, Junho
Lee, Jaejun
Usefulness of the additional contrast agents to identify offending nerve root in selective nerve root block
title Usefulness of the additional contrast agents to identify offending nerve root in selective nerve root block
title_full Usefulness of the additional contrast agents to identify offending nerve root in selective nerve root block
title_fullStr Usefulness of the additional contrast agents to identify offending nerve root in selective nerve root block
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of the additional contrast agents to identify offending nerve root in selective nerve root block
title_short Usefulness of the additional contrast agents to identify offending nerve root in selective nerve root block
title_sort usefulness of the additional contrast agents to identify offending nerve root in selective nerve root block
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35118998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025131
work_keys_str_mv AT kosangbong usefulnessoftheadditionalcontrastagentstoidentifyoffendingnerverootinselectivenerverootblock
AT namjunho usefulnessoftheadditionalcontrastagentstoidentifyoffendingnerverootinselectivenerverootblock
AT leejaejun usefulnessoftheadditionalcontrastagentstoidentifyoffendingnerverootinselectivenerverootblock