Cargando…
Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for septic shock: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Septic shock is a life-threatening syndrome. Despite Western medicine guidelines being continually updated on septic shock, the disease still has a high mortality rate. Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) are injections made from effective components of traditional Chinese medicine, which h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35118999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028183 |
_version_ | 1784644702035771392 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Peiying Chen, Yan Liu, Qiang Lei, Sisi Feng, Yuchao Wu, Qihua Zhang, Haobo Chen, Bojun Zeng, Zhongyi |
author_facet | Huang, Peiying Chen, Yan Liu, Qiang Lei, Sisi Feng, Yuchao Wu, Qihua Zhang, Haobo Chen, Bojun Zeng, Zhongyi |
author_sort | Huang, Peiying |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Septic shock is a life-threatening syndrome. Despite Western medicine guidelines being continually updated on septic shock, the disease still has a high mortality rate. Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) are injections made from effective components of traditional Chinese medicine, which have a potential therapeutic effect on septic shock and are recommended as the adjunctive treatment for septic shock in China. Although pairwise meta-analysis has been published for category-single CHIs about treatment effects of septic shock, there is no meta-analysis comparing more than 3 various types of CHIs used for septic shock. METHODS: Chinese and English databases will be retrieved for randomized controlled trials from the establishment of the databases to September 30, 2021. Two reviewers will perform literature searches and data extractions while another 2 reviewers for risk assessments. RevMan V.5.4 software, Stata V.14.0 software, and R V. 4.1.1 software will be applied to perform pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. We will apply the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess the risk of bias while the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach will be used to summarize the results of the study. The PRISMA-P guideline was followed for this protocol. RESULTS: The current study will explore the therapeutic effect of CHIs in the treatment of septic shock through pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: This study will seek out the best-performed CHIs under various indicators for septic shock, providing supporting evidence for clinical selection of CHIs for septic shock. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8812664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88126642022-02-18 Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for septic shock: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis Huang, Peiying Chen, Yan Liu, Qiang Lei, Sisi Feng, Yuchao Wu, Qihua Zhang, Haobo Chen, Bojun Zeng, Zhongyi Medicine (Baltimore) 3900 BACKGROUND: Septic shock is a life-threatening syndrome. Despite Western medicine guidelines being continually updated on septic shock, the disease still has a high mortality rate. Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) are injections made from effective components of traditional Chinese medicine, which have a potential therapeutic effect on septic shock and are recommended as the adjunctive treatment for septic shock in China. Although pairwise meta-analysis has been published for category-single CHIs about treatment effects of septic shock, there is no meta-analysis comparing more than 3 various types of CHIs used for septic shock. METHODS: Chinese and English databases will be retrieved for randomized controlled trials from the establishment of the databases to September 30, 2021. Two reviewers will perform literature searches and data extractions while another 2 reviewers for risk assessments. RevMan V.5.4 software, Stata V.14.0 software, and R V. 4.1.1 software will be applied to perform pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. We will apply the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess the risk of bias while the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach will be used to summarize the results of the study. The PRISMA-P guideline was followed for this protocol. RESULTS: The current study will explore the therapeutic effect of CHIs in the treatment of septic shock through pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: This study will seek out the best-performed CHIs under various indicators for septic shock, providing supporting evidence for clinical selection of CHIs for septic shock. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8812664/ /pubmed/35118999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028183 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 3900 Huang, Peiying Chen, Yan Liu, Qiang Lei, Sisi Feng, Yuchao Wu, Qihua Zhang, Haobo Chen, Bojun Zeng, Zhongyi Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for septic shock: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for septic shock: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for septic shock: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for septic shock: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for septic shock: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for septic shock: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparative efficacy of chinese herbal injections for septic shock: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | 3900 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35118999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028183 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangpeiying comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforsepticshockaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT chenyan comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforsepticshockaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT liuqiang comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforsepticshockaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT leisisi comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforsepticshockaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT fengyuchao comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforsepticshockaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT wuqihua comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforsepticshockaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zhanghaobo comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforsepticshockaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT chenbojun comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforsepticshockaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zengzhongyi comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforsepticshockaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |