Cargando…

Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for septic shock: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Septic shock is a life-threatening syndrome. Despite Western medicine guidelines being continually updated on septic shock, the disease still has a high mortality rate. Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) are injections made from effective components of traditional Chinese medicine, which h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Peiying, Chen, Yan, Liu, Qiang, Lei, Sisi, Feng, Yuchao, Wu, Qihua, Zhang, Haobo, Chen, Bojun, Zeng, Zhongyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35118999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028183
_version_ 1784644702035771392
author Huang, Peiying
Chen, Yan
Liu, Qiang
Lei, Sisi
Feng, Yuchao
Wu, Qihua
Zhang, Haobo
Chen, Bojun
Zeng, Zhongyi
author_facet Huang, Peiying
Chen, Yan
Liu, Qiang
Lei, Sisi
Feng, Yuchao
Wu, Qihua
Zhang, Haobo
Chen, Bojun
Zeng, Zhongyi
author_sort Huang, Peiying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Septic shock is a life-threatening syndrome. Despite Western medicine guidelines being continually updated on septic shock, the disease still has a high mortality rate. Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) are injections made from effective components of traditional Chinese medicine, which have a potential therapeutic effect on septic shock and are recommended as the adjunctive treatment for septic shock in China. Although pairwise meta-analysis has been published for category-single CHIs about treatment effects of septic shock, there is no meta-analysis comparing more than 3 various types of CHIs used for septic shock. METHODS: Chinese and English databases will be retrieved for randomized controlled trials from the establishment of the databases to September 30, 2021. Two reviewers will perform literature searches and data extractions while another 2 reviewers for risk assessments. RevMan V.5.4 software, Stata V.14.0 software, and R V. 4.1.1 software will be applied to perform pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. We will apply the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess the risk of bias while the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach will be used to summarize the results of the study. The PRISMA-P guideline was followed for this protocol. RESULTS: The current study will explore the therapeutic effect of CHIs in the treatment of septic shock through pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: This study will seek out the best-performed CHIs under various indicators for septic shock, providing supporting evidence for clinical selection of CHIs for septic shock.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8812664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88126642022-02-18 Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for septic shock: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis Huang, Peiying Chen, Yan Liu, Qiang Lei, Sisi Feng, Yuchao Wu, Qihua Zhang, Haobo Chen, Bojun Zeng, Zhongyi Medicine (Baltimore) 3900 BACKGROUND: Septic shock is a life-threatening syndrome. Despite Western medicine guidelines being continually updated on septic shock, the disease still has a high mortality rate. Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) are injections made from effective components of traditional Chinese medicine, which have a potential therapeutic effect on septic shock and are recommended as the adjunctive treatment for septic shock in China. Although pairwise meta-analysis has been published for category-single CHIs about treatment effects of septic shock, there is no meta-analysis comparing more than 3 various types of CHIs used for septic shock. METHODS: Chinese and English databases will be retrieved for randomized controlled trials from the establishment of the databases to September 30, 2021. Two reviewers will perform literature searches and data extractions while another 2 reviewers for risk assessments. RevMan V.5.4 software, Stata V.14.0 software, and R V. 4.1.1 software will be applied to perform pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. We will apply the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess the risk of bias while the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach will be used to summarize the results of the study. The PRISMA-P guideline was followed for this protocol. RESULTS: The current study will explore the therapeutic effect of CHIs in the treatment of septic shock through pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: This study will seek out the best-performed CHIs under various indicators for septic shock, providing supporting evidence for clinical selection of CHIs for septic shock. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8812664/ /pubmed/35118999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028183 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 3900
Huang, Peiying
Chen, Yan
Liu, Qiang
Lei, Sisi
Feng, Yuchao
Wu, Qihua
Zhang, Haobo
Chen, Bojun
Zeng, Zhongyi
Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for septic shock: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for septic shock: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for septic shock: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for septic shock: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for septic shock: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for septic shock: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy of chinese herbal injections for septic shock: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic 3900
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35118999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028183
work_keys_str_mv AT huangpeiying comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforsepticshockaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenyan comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforsepticshockaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT liuqiang comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforsepticshockaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT leisisi comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforsepticshockaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT fengyuchao comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforsepticshockaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT wuqihua comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforsepticshockaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhanghaobo comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforsepticshockaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenbojun comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforsepticshockaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT zengzhongyi comparativeefficacyofchineseherbalinjectionsforsepticshockaprotocolforsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis