Cargando…

Outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The present meta-analysis of clinical and simulation trials aimed to compare video-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (V-DACPR) with conventional audio-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-DACPR). METHODS: We search...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bielski, Karol, Böttiger, Bernd W., Pruc, Michal, Gasecka, Aleksandra, Sieminski, Mariusz, Jaguszewski, Milosz J., Smereka, Jacek, Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza, Peacock, Frank W., Szarpak, Lukasz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35107406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2032314
_version_ 1784644719940206592
author Bielski, Karol
Böttiger, Bernd W.
Pruc, Michal
Gasecka, Aleksandra
Sieminski, Mariusz
Jaguszewski, Milosz J.
Smereka, Jacek
Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza
Peacock, Frank W.
Szarpak, Lukasz
author_facet Bielski, Karol
Böttiger, Bernd W.
Pruc, Michal
Gasecka, Aleksandra
Sieminski, Mariusz
Jaguszewski, Milosz J.
Smereka, Jacek
Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza
Peacock, Frank W.
Szarpak, Lukasz
author_sort Bielski, Karol
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The present meta-analysis of clinical and simulation trials aimed to compare video-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (V-DACPR) with conventional audio-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-DACPR). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collaboration databases and Scopus from inception until June 10, 2021. The primary outcomes were the prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital discharge, and survival to hospital discharge with a good neurological outcome for clinical trials, and chest compression quality for simulation trials. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) indicated the pooled effect. The analyses were performed with the RevMan 5.4 and STATA 14 software. RESULTS: Overall, 2 clinical and 8 simulation trials were included in this meta-analysis. In clinical trials, C-DACPR and V-DACPR were characterised by, respectively, 11.8% vs. 24.3% of prehospital ROSC (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.69; I(2) = 66%; p < .001), 10.7% vs. 22.3% of survival to hospital discharge (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.70; I(2) = 69%; p < .001), and 6.3% vs. 16.0% of survival to hospital discharge with a good neurological outcome (OR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.67; I(2) = 73%; p < .001). In simulation trials, chest compression rate per minute equalled 91.3 ± 22.6 for C-DACPR and 107.8 ± 12.6 for V-DACPR (MD = −13.40; 95% CI: −21.86, −4.95; I(2) = 97%; p = .002). The respective values for chest compression depth were 38.7 ± 14.3 and 41.8 ± 12.5 mm (MD = −2.67; 95% CI: −8.35, 3.01; I(2) = 98%; p = .36). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with C-DACPR, V-DACPR significantly increased prehospital ROSC and survival to hospital discharge. Under simulated resuscitation conditions, V-DACPR exhibited a higher rate of adequate chest compressions than C-DACPR. KEY MESSAGES: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation parameters significantly depend on the dispatcher’s support and the manner of the support provided. Video-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation can increase the rate of prehospital return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge. Video-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves the quality of chest compressions compared with dispatcher-assisted resuscitation without video instruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8812740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88127402022-02-04 Outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis Bielski, Karol Böttiger, Bernd W. Pruc, Michal Gasecka, Aleksandra Sieminski, Mariusz Jaguszewski, Milosz J. Smereka, Jacek Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza Peacock, Frank W. Szarpak, Lukasz Ann Med Emergency Medicine BACKGROUND: The present meta-analysis of clinical and simulation trials aimed to compare video-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (V-DACPR) with conventional audio-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-DACPR). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collaboration databases and Scopus from inception until June 10, 2021. The primary outcomes were the prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital discharge, and survival to hospital discharge with a good neurological outcome for clinical trials, and chest compression quality for simulation trials. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) indicated the pooled effect. The analyses were performed with the RevMan 5.4 and STATA 14 software. RESULTS: Overall, 2 clinical and 8 simulation trials were included in this meta-analysis. In clinical trials, C-DACPR and V-DACPR were characterised by, respectively, 11.8% vs. 24.3% of prehospital ROSC (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.69; I(2) = 66%; p < .001), 10.7% vs. 22.3% of survival to hospital discharge (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.70; I(2) = 69%; p < .001), and 6.3% vs. 16.0% of survival to hospital discharge with a good neurological outcome (OR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.67; I(2) = 73%; p < .001). In simulation trials, chest compression rate per minute equalled 91.3 ± 22.6 for C-DACPR and 107.8 ± 12.6 for V-DACPR (MD = −13.40; 95% CI: −21.86, −4.95; I(2) = 97%; p = .002). The respective values for chest compression depth were 38.7 ± 14.3 and 41.8 ± 12.5 mm (MD = −2.67; 95% CI: −8.35, 3.01; I(2) = 98%; p = .36). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with C-DACPR, V-DACPR significantly increased prehospital ROSC and survival to hospital discharge. Under simulated resuscitation conditions, V-DACPR exhibited a higher rate of adequate chest compressions than C-DACPR. KEY MESSAGES: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation parameters significantly depend on the dispatcher’s support and the manner of the support provided. Video-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation can increase the rate of prehospital return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge. Video-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves the quality of chest compressions compared with dispatcher-assisted resuscitation without video instruction. Taylor & Francis 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8812740/ /pubmed/35107406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2032314 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Bielski, Karol
Böttiger, Bernd W.
Pruc, Michal
Gasecka, Aleksandra
Sieminski, Mariusz
Jaguszewski, Milosz J.
Smereka, Jacek
Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza
Peacock, Frank W.
Szarpak, Lukasz
Outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35107406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2032314
work_keys_str_mv AT bielskikarol outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bottigerberndw outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT prucmichal outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaseckaaleksandra outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sieminskimariusz outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jaguszewskimiloszj outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT smerekajacek outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gilismalinowskanatasza outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT peacockfrankw outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT szarpaklukasz outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis