Cargando…
Outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The present meta-analysis of clinical and simulation trials aimed to compare video-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (V-DACPR) with conventional audio-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-DACPR). METHODS: We search...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35107406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2032314 |
_version_ | 1784644719940206592 |
---|---|
author | Bielski, Karol Böttiger, Bernd W. Pruc, Michal Gasecka, Aleksandra Sieminski, Mariusz Jaguszewski, Milosz J. Smereka, Jacek Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza Peacock, Frank W. Szarpak, Lukasz |
author_facet | Bielski, Karol Böttiger, Bernd W. Pruc, Michal Gasecka, Aleksandra Sieminski, Mariusz Jaguszewski, Milosz J. Smereka, Jacek Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza Peacock, Frank W. Szarpak, Lukasz |
author_sort | Bielski, Karol |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The present meta-analysis of clinical and simulation trials aimed to compare video-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (V-DACPR) with conventional audio-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-DACPR). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collaboration databases and Scopus from inception until June 10, 2021. The primary outcomes were the prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital discharge, and survival to hospital discharge with a good neurological outcome for clinical trials, and chest compression quality for simulation trials. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) indicated the pooled effect. The analyses were performed with the RevMan 5.4 and STATA 14 software. RESULTS: Overall, 2 clinical and 8 simulation trials were included in this meta-analysis. In clinical trials, C-DACPR and V-DACPR were characterised by, respectively, 11.8% vs. 24.3% of prehospital ROSC (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.69; I(2) = 66%; p < .001), 10.7% vs. 22.3% of survival to hospital discharge (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.70; I(2) = 69%; p < .001), and 6.3% vs. 16.0% of survival to hospital discharge with a good neurological outcome (OR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.67; I(2) = 73%; p < .001). In simulation trials, chest compression rate per minute equalled 91.3 ± 22.6 for C-DACPR and 107.8 ± 12.6 for V-DACPR (MD = −13.40; 95% CI: −21.86, −4.95; I(2) = 97%; p = .002). The respective values for chest compression depth were 38.7 ± 14.3 and 41.8 ± 12.5 mm (MD = −2.67; 95% CI: −8.35, 3.01; I(2) = 98%; p = .36). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with C-DACPR, V-DACPR significantly increased prehospital ROSC and survival to hospital discharge. Under simulated resuscitation conditions, V-DACPR exhibited a higher rate of adequate chest compressions than C-DACPR. KEY MESSAGES: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation parameters significantly depend on the dispatcher’s support and the manner of the support provided. Video-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation can increase the rate of prehospital return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge. Video-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves the quality of chest compressions compared with dispatcher-assisted resuscitation without video instruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8812740 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88127402022-02-04 Outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis Bielski, Karol Böttiger, Bernd W. Pruc, Michal Gasecka, Aleksandra Sieminski, Mariusz Jaguszewski, Milosz J. Smereka, Jacek Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza Peacock, Frank W. Szarpak, Lukasz Ann Med Emergency Medicine BACKGROUND: The present meta-analysis of clinical and simulation trials aimed to compare video-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (V-DACPR) with conventional audio-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-DACPR). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collaboration databases and Scopus from inception until June 10, 2021. The primary outcomes were the prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital discharge, and survival to hospital discharge with a good neurological outcome for clinical trials, and chest compression quality for simulation trials. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) indicated the pooled effect. The analyses were performed with the RevMan 5.4 and STATA 14 software. RESULTS: Overall, 2 clinical and 8 simulation trials were included in this meta-analysis. In clinical trials, C-DACPR and V-DACPR were characterised by, respectively, 11.8% vs. 24.3% of prehospital ROSC (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.69; I(2) = 66%; p < .001), 10.7% vs. 22.3% of survival to hospital discharge (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.70; I(2) = 69%; p < .001), and 6.3% vs. 16.0% of survival to hospital discharge with a good neurological outcome (OR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.67; I(2) = 73%; p < .001). In simulation trials, chest compression rate per minute equalled 91.3 ± 22.6 for C-DACPR and 107.8 ± 12.6 for V-DACPR (MD = −13.40; 95% CI: −21.86, −4.95; I(2) = 97%; p = .002). The respective values for chest compression depth were 38.7 ± 14.3 and 41.8 ± 12.5 mm (MD = −2.67; 95% CI: −8.35, 3.01; I(2) = 98%; p = .36). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with C-DACPR, V-DACPR significantly increased prehospital ROSC and survival to hospital discharge. Under simulated resuscitation conditions, V-DACPR exhibited a higher rate of adequate chest compressions than C-DACPR. KEY MESSAGES: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation parameters significantly depend on the dispatcher’s support and the manner of the support provided. Video-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation can increase the rate of prehospital return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge. Video-instructed dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves the quality of chest compressions compared with dispatcher-assisted resuscitation without video instruction. Taylor & Francis 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8812740/ /pubmed/35107406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2032314 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Bielski, Karol Böttiger, Bernd W. Pruc, Michal Gasecka, Aleksandra Sieminski, Mariusz Jaguszewski, Milosz J. Smereka, Jacek Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza Peacock, Frank W. Szarpak, Lukasz Outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35107406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2032314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bielskikarol outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bottigerberndw outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT prucmichal outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gaseckaaleksandra outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sieminskimariusz outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jaguszewskimiloszj outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT smerekajacek outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gilismalinowskanatasza outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT peacockfrankw outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT szarpaklukasz outcomesofaudioinstructedandvideoinstructeddispatcherassistedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |