Cargando…

Valid and reliable neonatal near-miss assessment scale in Ethiopia: a psychometric validation

BACKGROUND: The concept of a neonatal near miss is used to explain neonates who nearly died but survived a life-threatening complication in the first 28 days of life. We have left many ill surviving (near-miss) neonates, due to a lack of valid and reliable assessment scale, particularly in Ethiopia....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melkamu Asaye, Mengstu, Gelaye, Kassahun Alemu, Matebe, Yohannes Hailu, Lindgren, Helena, Erlandsson, Kerstin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35107412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2022.2029334
_version_ 1784644730529775616
author Melkamu Asaye, Mengstu
Gelaye, Kassahun Alemu
Matebe, Yohannes Hailu
Lindgren, Helena
Erlandsson, Kerstin
author_facet Melkamu Asaye, Mengstu
Gelaye, Kassahun Alemu
Matebe, Yohannes Hailu
Lindgren, Helena
Erlandsson, Kerstin
author_sort Melkamu Asaye, Mengstu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The concept of a neonatal near miss is used to explain neonates who nearly died but survived a life-threatening complication in the first 28 days of life. We have left many ill surviving (near-miss) neonates, due to a lack of valid and reliable assessment scale, particularly in Ethiopia. AIM: We aim to psychometrically validate the neonatal near-miss assessment scale (NNMAS) for Ethiopia. METHODS: A total of 465 live birth neonates were included with the assumption of a participant-to-item ratio of 15:1. A new contextually validated NNMAS was used to collect data. The Kaiseri––Mayer––Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy with a cutoff value of ≥0.50 for each item was applied. For reliability and validity of NNMAS, exploratory factor analysis using principal component analysis with oblique varimax rotation was used. Internal consistency and reliability were assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Convergent and discriminant validity was assessed using composite reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE). RESULTS: The Kaiser––Mayer––Olkin (KMO = 0.74) measure of sampling adequacy and Bartlett’s Sphericity test for the appropriateness of the identity matrix (χ(2) = 2903.9, df = 276, and P = 0.000) were suitable for exploratory factor analysis (EFA). The correlation matrix determinant of the study was 0.002. The principal component analysis (PCA) identified six factors and together explained 54.3% of the variation in the Neonatal Near miss. The Cronbach-alpha coefficient was 0.80 for the entire scale. The composite reliability values of the factors ranged from 0.87 to 0.95. The AVEs, CR, and factor loadings were above 0.5 for all factors indicating that convergent validity was met. The square roots of the AVEs were greater than factor correlation values. It was revealed that discriminated validity was also met. CONCLUSION: The neonatal near-miss assessment scale was found to be valid and reliable in the present context. The scale can be used to identify near-miss neonates in Ethiopia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8812796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88127962022-02-04 Valid and reliable neonatal near-miss assessment scale in Ethiopia: a psychometric validation Melkamu Asaye, Mengstu Gelaye, Kassahun Alemu Matebe, Yohannes Hailu Lindgren, Helena Erlandsson, Kerstin Glob Health Action Research Article BACKGROUND: The concept of a neonatal near miss is used to explain neonates who nearly died but survived a life-threatening complication in the first 28 days of life. We have left many ill surviving (near-miss) neonates, due to a lack of valid and reliable assessment scale, particularly in Ethiopia. AIM: We aim to psychometrically validate the neonatal near-miss assessment scale (NNMAS) for Ethiopia. METHODS: A total of 465 live birth neonates were included with the assumption of a participant-to-item ratio of 15:1. A new contextually validated NNMAS was used to collect data. The Kaiseri––Mayer––Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy with a cutoff value of ≥0.50 for each item was applied. For reliability and validity of NNMAS, exploratory factor analysis using principal component analysis with oblique varimax rotation was used. Internal consistency and reliability were assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Convergent and discriminant validity was assessed using composite reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE). RESULTS: The Kaiser––Mayer––Olkin (KMO = 0.74) measure of sampling adequacy and Bartlett’s Sphericity test for the appropriateness of the identity matrix (χ(2) = 2903.9, df = 276, and P = 0.000) were suitable for exploratory factor analysis (EFA). The correlation matrix determinant of the study was 0.002. The principal component analysis (PCA) identified six factors and together explained 54.3% of the variation in the Neonatal Near miss. The Cronbach-alpha coefficient was 0.80 for the entire scale. The composite reliability values of the factors ranged from 0.87 to 0.95. The AVEs, CR, and factor loadings were above 0.5 for all factors indicating that convergent validity was met. The square roots of the AVEs were greater than factor correlation values. It was revealed that discriminated validity was also met. CONCLUSION: The neonatal near-miss assessment scale was found to be valid and reliable in the present context. The scale can be used to identify near-miss neonates in Ethiopia. Taylor & Francis 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8812796/ /pubmed/35107412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2022.2029334 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Melkamu Asaye, Mengstu
Gelaye, Kassahun Alemu
Matebe, Yohannes Hailu
Lindgren, Helena
Erlandsson, Kerstin
Valid and reliable neonatal near-miss assessment scale in Ethiopia: a psychometric validation
title Valid and reliable neonatal near-miss assessment scale in Ethiopia: a psychometric validation
title_full Valid and reliable neonatal near-miss assessment scale in Ethiopia: a psychometric validation
title_fullStr Valid and reliable neonatal near-miss assessment scale in Ethiopia: a psychometric validation
title_full_unstemmed Valid and reliable neonatal near-miss assessment scale in Ethiopia: a psychometric validation
title_short Valid and reliable neonatal near-miss assessment scale in Ethiopia: a psychometric validation
title_sort valid and reliable neonatal near-miss assessment scale in ethiopia: a psychometric validation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35107412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2022.2029334
work_keys_str_mv AT melkamuasayemengstu validandreliableneonatalnearmissassessmentscaleinethiopiaapsychometricvalidation
AT gelayekassahunalemu validandreliableneonatalnearmissassessmentscaleinethiopiaapsychometricvalidation
AT matebeyohanneshailu validandreliableneonatalnearmissassessmentscaleinethiopiaapsychometricvalidation
AT lindgrenhelena validandreliableneonatalnearmissassessmentscaleinethiopiaapsychometricvalidation
AT erlandssonkerstin validandreliableneonatalnearmissassessmentscaleinethiopiaapsychometricvalidation