Cargando…

The rates and measurement of adherence to acamprosate in randomised controlled clinical trials: A systematic review

AIM: The current research aims to systematically review the rates of adherence reported in randomised controlled clinical trials of acamprosate. It also sought to determine the reliability of the adherence monitoring and measurement methods used in these trials. METHODS: The protocol for this review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donoghue, Kim, Hermann, Laura, Brobbin, Eileen, Drummond, Colin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35113930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263350
_version_ 1784644754579914752
author Donoghue, Kim
Hermann, Laura
Brobbin, Eileen
Drummond, Colin
author_facet Donoghue, Kim
Hermann, Laura
Brobbin, Eileen
Drummond, Colin
author_sort Donoghue, Kim
collection PubMed
description AIM: The current research aims to systematically review the rates of adherence reported in randomised controlled clinical trials of acamprosate. It also sought to determine the reliability of the adherence monitoring and measurement methods used in these trials. METHODS: The protocol for this review was pre-registered (PROSPERO: CRD42021230011). A search of the literature was conducted using OVID MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO from database inception to January 2021. Randomised controlled trials with a minimum sample size of 10 per treatment arm that compared the efficacy of acamprosate with placebo or other active medication in adults with a diagnosis of alcohol dependence were included. Data on rates of adherence, methods of measurement and monitoring of adherence was extracted from eligible studies independently in duplicate by two reviewers. A weighted mean adherence rate was calculated. The reliability of adherence monitoring methods was determined by calculating an adherence-assurance score based on the adherence monitoring method used. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the eligibility criteria involving 4,450 participants (2,480 participants in the placebo arms). A mean adherence rate of 88% (54.2–95.0%) was reported across studies that reported the percentage of medication taken. A mean adherence rate of 84.9% (56.4–91.3%) was reported for trials that reported the percentage of participants taking more than 80% of medication prescribed. There is low confidence in the methods used to monitor adherence with all clinical trials having a low adherence-assurance rating. Risk of bias was judged to be high for all included studies. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to acamprosate in clinical trials can be poor with low confidence in the methods used to measure it. Adherence rates therefore might not be accurate, which has implications for determining the efficacy of acamprosate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8812903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88129032022-02-04 The rates and measurement of adherence to acamprosate in randomised controlled clinical trials: A systematic review Donoghue, Kim Hermann, Laura Brobbin, Eileen Drummond, Colin PLoS One Research Article AIM: The current research aims to systematically review the rates of adherence reported in randomised controlled clinical trials of acamprosate. It also sought to determine the reliability of the adherence monitoring and measurement methods used in these trials. METHODS: The protocol for this review was pre-registered (PROSPERO: CRD42021230011). A search of the literature was conducted using OVID MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO from database inception to January 2021. Randomised controlled trials with a minimum sample size of 10 per treatment arm that compared the efficacy of acamprosate with placebo or other active medication in adults with a diagnosis of alcohol dependence were included. Data on rates of adherence, methods of measurement and monitoring of adherence was extracted from eligible studies independently in duplicate by two reviewers. A weighted mean adherence rate was calculated. The reliability of adherence monitoring methods was determined by calculating an adherence-assurance score based on the adherence monitoring method used. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the eligibility criteria involving 4,450 participants (2,480 participants in the placebo arms). A mean adherence rate of 88% (54.2–95.0%) was reported across studies that reported the percentage of medication taken. A mean adherence rate of 84.9% (56.4–91.3%) was reported for trials that reported the percentage of participants taking more than 80% of medication prescribed. There is low confidence in the methods used to monitor adherence with all clinical trials having a low adherence-assurance rating. Risk of bias was judged to be high for all included studies. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to acamprosate in clinical trials can be poor with low confidence in the methods used to measure it. Adherence rates therefore might not be accurate, which has implications for determining the efficacy of acamprosate. Public Library of Science 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8812903/ /pubmed/35113930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263350 Text en © 2022 Donoghue et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Donoghue, Kim
Hermann, Laura
Brobbin, Eileen
Drummond, Colin
The rates and measurement of adherence to acamprosate in randomised controlled clinical trials: A systematic review
title The rates and measurement of adherence to acamprosate in randomised controlled clinical trials: A systematic review
title_full The rates and measurement of adherence to acamprosate in randomised controlled clinical trials: A systematic review
title_fullStr The rates and measurement of adherence to acamprosate in randomised controlled clinical trials: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The rates and measurement of adherence to acamprosate in randomised controlled clinical trials: A systematic review
title_short The rates and measurement of adherence to acamprosate in randomised controlled clinical trials: A systematic review
title_sort rates and measurement of adherence to acamprosate in randomised controlled clinical trials: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35113930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263350
work_keys_str_mv AT donoghuekim theratesandmeasurementofadherencetoacamprosateinrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialsasystematicreview
AT hermannlaura theratesandmeasurementofadherencetoacamprosateinrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialsasystematicreview
AT brobbineileen theratesandmeasurementofadherencetoacamprosateinrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialsasystematicreview
AT drummondcolin theratesandmeasurementofadherencetoacamprosateinrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialsasystematicreview
AT donoghuekim ratesandmeasurementofadherencetoacamprosateinrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialsasystematicreview
AT hermannlaura ratesandmeasurementofadherencetoacamprosateinrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialsasystematicreview
AT brobbineileen ratesandmeasurementofadherencetoacamprosateinrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialsasystematicreview
AT drummondcolin ratesandmeasurementofadherencetoacamprosateinrandomisedcontrolledclinicaltrialsasystematicreview