Cargando…

Costing Analysis of Scalable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Modules Using Bottom Up Technique

In recent years, perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have achieved a remarkable power conversion efficiency of 25.5%, indicating that they are a promising alternative to dominant Si photovoltaic (PV) technology. This technology is expected to solve the world's energy demand with minimal investment an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kajal, Priyanka, Verma, Bhupesh, Vadaga, Satya Gangadhara Rao, Powar, Satvasheel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35140980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202100070
_version_ 1784644758980788224
author Kajal, Priyanka
Verma, Bhupesh
Vadaga, Satya Gangadhara Rao
Powar, Satvasheel
author_facet Kajal, Priyanka
Verma, Bhupesh
Vadaga, Satya Gangadhara Rao
Powar, Satvasheel
author_sort Kajal, Priyanka
collection PubMed
description In recent years, perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have achieved a remarkable power conversion efficiency of 25.5%, indicating that they are a promising alternative to dominant Si photovoltaic (PV) technology. This technology is expected to solve the world's energy demand with minimal investment and very low CO(2) emissions. The market has shown a lot of interest in PSCs technology. A technoeconomic analysis is a useful tool for tracking manufacturing costs and forecasting whether technology will eventually achieve market‐driven prices. A technoeconomic analysis of a 100 MW carbon‐based perovskite solar module (CPSM) factory located in India is presented in this paper. Two CPSMs architectures—high‐temperature processed CPSMs (Module A) and low‐temperature processed CPSM's (Module B)—are expected to offer minimum sustainable prices (MSPs) of $ 0.21 W(‐1) and $ 0.15 W(‐1). On the basis of MSP, the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) is calculated to be 3.40 ¢ kWh(‐1) for module A and 3.02 ¢ kWh(‐1) for module B, with a 10‐year module lifetime assumption. The same modules with a 25‐year lifespan have LCOEs of 1.66 and 1.47 ¢ kWh(‐1), respectively. These estimates are comparable to market dominant crystalline silicon solar modules, and they are also favorable for utilizing perovskite solar cell technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8812919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88129192022-02-08 Costing Analysis of Scalable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Modules Using Bottom Up Technique Kajal, Priyanka Verma, Bhupesh Vadaga, Satya Gangadhara Rao Powar, Satvasheel Glob Chall Research Articles In recent years, perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have achieved a remarkable power conversion efficiency of 25.5%, indicating that they are a promising alternative to dominant Si photovoltaic (PV) technology. This technology is expected to solve the world's energy demand with minimal investment and very low CO(2) emissions. The market has shown a lot of interest in PSCs technology. A technoeconomic analysis is a useful tool for tracking manufacturing costs and forecasting whether technology will eventually achieve market‐driven prices. A technoeconomic analysis of a 100 MW carbon‐based perovskite solar module (CPSM) factory located in India is presented in this paper. Two CPSMs architectures—high‐temperature processed CPSMs (Module A) and low‐temperature processed CPSM's (Module B)—are expected to offer minimum sustainable prices (MSPs) of $ 0.21 W(‐1) and $ 0.15 W(‐1). On the basis of MSP, the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) is calculated to be 3.40 ¢ kWh(‐1) for module A and 3.02 ¢ kWh(‐1) for module B, with a 10‐year module lifetime assumption. The same modules with a 25‐year lifespan have LCOEs of 1.66 and 1.47 ¢ kWh(‐1), respectively. These estimates are comparable to market dominant crystalline silicon solar modules, and they are also favorable for utilizing perovskite solar cell technology. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8812919/ /pubmed/35140980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202100070 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Global Challenges published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Kajal, Priyanka
Verma, Bhupesh
Vadaga, Satya Gangadhara Rao
Powar, Satvasheel
Costing Analysis of Scalable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Modules Using Bottom Up Technique
title Costing Analysis of Scalable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Modules Using Bottom Up Technique
title_full Costing Analysis of Scalable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Modules Using Bottom Up Technique
title_fullStr Costing Analysis of Scalable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Modules Using Bottom Up Technique
title_full_unstemmed Costing Analysis of Scalable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Modules Using Bottom Up Technique
title_short Costing Analysis of Scalable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Modules Using Bottom Up Technique
title_sort costing analysis of scalable carbon‐based perovskite modules using bottom up technique
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35140980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202100070
work_keys_str_mv AT kajalpriyanka costinganalysisofscalablecarbonbasedperovskitemodulesusingbottomuptechnique
AT vermabhupesh costinganalysisofscalablecarbonbasedperovskitemodulesusingbottomuptechnique
AT vadagasatyagangadhararao costinganalysisofscalablecarbonbasedperovskitemodulesusingbottomuptechnique
AT powarsatvasheel costinganalysisofscalablecarbonbasedperovskitemodulesusingbottomuptechnique