Cargando…
Costing Analysis of Scalable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Modules Using Bottom Up Technique
In recent years, perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have achieved a remarkable power conversion efficiency of 25.5%, indicating that they are a promising alternative to dominant Si photovoltaic (PV) technology. This technology is expected to solve the world's energy demand with minimal investment an...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35140980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202100070 |
_version_ | 1784644758980788224 |
---|---|
author | Kajal, Priyanka Verma, Bhupesh Vadaga, Satya Gangadhara Rao Powar, Satvasheel |
author_facet | Kajal, Priyanka Verma, Bhupesh Vadaga, Satya Gangadhara Rao Powar, Satvasheel |
author_sort | Kajal, Priyanka |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent years, perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have achieved a remarkable power conversion efficiency of 25.5%, indicating that they are a promising alternative to dominant Si photovoltaic (PV) technology. This technology is expected to solve the world's energy demand with minimal investment and very low CO(2) emissions. The market has shown a lot of interest in PSCs technology. A technoeconomic analysis is a useful tool for tracking manufacturing costs and forecasting whether technology will eventually achieve market‐driven prices. A technoeconomic analysis of a 100 MW carbon‐based perovskite solar module (CPSM) factory located in India is presented in this paper. Two CPSMs architectures—high‐temperature processed CPSMs (Module A) and low‐temperature processed CPSM's (Module B)—are expected to offer minimum sustainable prices (MSPs) of $ 0.21 W(‐1) and $ 0.15 W(‐1). On the basis of MSP, the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) is calculated to be 3.40 ¢ kWh(‐1) for module A and 3.02 ¢ kWh(‐1) for module B, with a 10‐year module lifetime assumption. The same modules with a 25‐year lifespan have LCOEs of 1.66 and 1.47 ¢ kWh(‐1), respectively. These estimates are comparable to market dominant crystalline silicon solar modules, and they are also favorable for utilizing perovskite solar cell technology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8812919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88129192022-02-08 Costing Analysis of Scalable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Modules Using Bottom Up Technique Kajal, Priyanka Verma, Bhupesh Vadaga, Satya Gangadhara Rao Powar, Satvasheel Glob Chall Research Articles In recent years, perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have achieved a remarkable power conversion efficiency of 25.5%, indicating that they are a promising alternative to dominant Si photovoltaic (PV) technology. This technology is expected to solve the world's energy demand with minimal investment and very low CO(2) emissions. The market has shown a lot of interest in PSCs technology. A technoeconomic analysis is a useful tool for tracking manufacturing costs and forecasting whether technology will eventually achieve market‐driven prices. A technoeconomic analysis of a 100 MW carbon‐based perovskite solar module (CPSM) factory located in India is presented in this paper. Two CPSMs architectures—high‐temperature processed CPSMs (Module A) and low‐temperature processed CPSM's (Module B)—are expected to offer minimum sustainable prices (MSPs) of $ 0.21 W(‐1) and $ 0.15 W(‐1). On the basis of MSP, the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) is calculated to be 3.40 ¢ kWh(‐1) for module A and 3.02 ¢ kWh(‐1) for module B, with a 10‐year module lifetime assumption. The same modules with a 25‐year lifespan have LCOEs of 1.66 and 1.47 ¢ kWh(‐1), respectively. These estimates are comparable to market dominant crystalline silicon solar modules, and they are also favorable for utilizing perovskite solar cell technology. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8812919/ /pubmed/35140980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202100070 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Global Challenges published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Kajal, Priyanka Verma, Bhupesh Vadaga, Satya Gangadhara Rao Powar, Satvasheel Costing Analysis of Scalable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Modules Using Bottom Up Technique |
title | Costing Analysis of Scalable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Modules Using Bottom Up Technique |
title_full | Costing Analysis of Scalable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Modules Using Bottom Up Technique |
title_fullStr | Costing Analysis of Scalable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Modules Using Bottom Up Technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Costing Analysis of Scalable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Modules Using Bottom Up Technique |
title_short | Costing Analysis of Scalable Carbon‐Based Perovskite Modules Using Bottom Up Technique |
title_sort | costing analysis of scalable carbon‐based perovskite modules using bottom up technique |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35140980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202100070 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kajalpriyanka costinganalysisofscalablecarbonbasedperovskitemodulesusingbottomuptechnique AT vermabhupesh costinganalysisofscalablecarbonbasedperovskitemodulesusingbottomuptechnique AT vadagasatyagangadhararao costinganalysisofscalablecarbonbasedperovskitemodulesusingbottomuptechnique AT powarsatvasheel costinganalysisofscalablecarbonbasedperovskitemodulesusingbottomuptechnique |