Cargando…
A protocol for the VISION study: An indiVidual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing MRI-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultraSound guided bIopsy in the detection of prOstate cancer
BACKGROUND: Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy for prostate cancer is prone to random and systemic error and has been shown to have a negative predictive value of 70%. PRECISION and PRECISE are among the first randomised studies to evaluate the new MRI-targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) pathway with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35113918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263345 |
_version_ | 1784644771190407168 |
---|---|
author | Kasivisvanathan, Veeru Chan, Vinson Wai-Shun Clement, Keiran D. Levis, Brooke Haider, Masoom Agarwal, Ridhi Emberton, Mark Pond, Gregory R. Takwoingi, Yemisi Klotz, Laurence Moore, Caroline M. |
author_facet | Kasivisvanathan, Veeru Chan, Vinson Wai-Shun Clement, Keiran D. Levis, Brooke Haider, Masoom Agarwal, Ridhi Emberton, Mark Pond, Gregory R. Takwoingi, Yemisi Klotz, Laurence Moore, Caroline M. |
author_sort | Kasivisvanathan, Veeru |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy for prostate cancer is prone to random and systemic error and has been shown to have a negative predictive value of 70%. PRECISION and PRECISE are among the first randomised studies to evaluate the new MRI-targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) pathway with a non-paired design to detect clinically significant prostate cancer and avoid unnecessary treatment. The trials’ results individually demonstrated non-inferiority of MRI-TB compared to TRUS biopsy. An individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis was planned from the outset of the two trials in parallel and this IPD meta-analysis aims to further elucidate the utility of MRI-TB as the optimal diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021249263). A search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Registered Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed up until 4(th) February 2021. Only randomised controlled trials (PRECISE, PRECISION and other eligible trials) comparing the MRI-targeted biopsy pathway and traditional TRUS biopsy pathway will be included. The primary outcome of the review is the proportion of men diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer in each arm (Gleason ≥ 3+4 = 7). IPD and study-level data and characteristics will be sought from eligible studies. Analyses will be done primarily using an intention-to-treat approach, and a one-step IPD meta-analysis will be performed using generalised linear mixed models. A non-inferiority margin of 5 percentage points will be used. Heterogeneity will be quantified using the variance parameters from the mixed model. If there is sufficient data, we will investigate heterogeneity by exploring the effect of the different conducts of MRIs, learning curves of MRI reporting and MRI targeted biopsies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This systematic review is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021249263) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8812968 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88129682022-02-04 A protocol for the VISION study: An indiVidual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing MRI-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultraSound guided bIopsy in the detection of prOstate cancer Kasivisvanathan, Veeru Chan, Vinson Wai-Shun Clement, Keiran D. Levis, Brooke Haider, Masoom Agarwal, Ridhi Emberton, Mark Pond, Gregory R. Takwoingi, Yemisi Klotz, Laurence Moore, Caroline M. PLoS One Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy for prostate cancer is prone to random and systemic error and has been shown to have a negative predictive value of 70%. PRECISION and PRECISE are among the first randomised studies to evaluate the new MRI-targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) pathway with a non-paired design to detect clinically significant prostate cancer and avoid unnecessary treatment. The trials’ results individually demonstrated non-inferiority of MRI-TB compared to TRUS biopsy. An individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis was planned from the outset of the two trials in parallel and this IPD meta-analysis aims to further elucidate the utility of MRI-TB as the optimal diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021249263). A search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Registered Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed up until 4(th) February 2021. Only randomised controlled trials (PRECISE, PRECISION and other eligible trials) comparing the MRI-targeted biopsy pathway and traditional TRUS biopsy pathway will be included. The primary outcome of the review is the proportion of men diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer in each arm (Gleason ≥ 3+4 = 7). IPD and study-level data and characteristics will be sought from eligible studies. Analyses will be done primarily using an intention-to-treat approach, and a one-step IPD meta-analysis will be performed using generalised linear mixed models. A non-inferiority margin of 5 percentage points will be used. Heterogeneity will be quantified using the variance parameters from the mixed model. If there is sufficient data, we will investigate heterogeneity by exploring the effect of the different conducts of MRIs, learning curves of MRI reporting and MRI targeted biopsies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This systematic review is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021249263) Public Library of Science 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8812968/ /pubmed/35113918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263345 Text en © 2022 Kasivisvanathan et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Kasivisvanathan, Veeru Chan, Vinson Wai-Shun Clement, Keiran D. Levis, Brooke Haider, Masoom Agarwal, Ridhi Emberton, Mark Pond, Gregory R. Takwoingi, Yemisi Klotz, Laurence Moore, Caroline M. A protocol for the VISION study: An indiVidual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing MRI-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultraSound guided bIopsy in the detection of prOstate cancer |
title | A protocol for the VISION study: An indiVidual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing MRI-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultraSound guided bIopsy in the detection of prOstate cancer |
title_full | A protocol for the VISION study: An indiVidual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing MRI-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultraSound guided bIopsy in the detection of prOstate cancer |
title_fullStr | A protocol for the VISION study: An indiVidual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing MRI-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultraSound guided bIopsy in the detection of prOstate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A protocol for the VISION study: An indiVidual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing MRI-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultraSound guided bIopsy in the detection of prOstate cancer |
title_short | A protocol for the VISION study: An indiVidual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing MRI-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultraSound guided bIopsy in the detection of prOstate cancer |
title_sort | protocol for the vision study: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing mri-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35113918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263345 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kasivisvanathanveeru aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT chanvinsonwaishun aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT clementkeirand aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT levisbrooke aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT haidermasoom aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT agarwalridhi aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT embertonmark aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT pondgregoryr aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT takwoingiyemisi aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT klotzlaurence aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT moorecarolinem aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT kasivisvanathanveeru protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT chanvinsonwaishun protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT clementkeirand protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT levisbrooke protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT haidermasoom protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT agarwalridhi protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT embertonmark protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT pondgregoryr protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT takwoingiyemisi protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT klotzlaurence protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT moorecarolinem protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer AT protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer |