Cargando…

A protocol for the VISION study: An indiVidual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing MRI-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultraSound guided bIopsy in the detection of prOstate cancer

BACKGROUND: Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy for prostate cancer is prone to random and systemic error and has been shown to have a negative predictive value of 70%. PRECISION and PRECISE are among the first randomised studies to evaluate the new MRI-targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) pathway with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasivisvanathan, Veeru, Chan, Vinson Wai-Shun, Clement, Keiran D., Levis, Brooke, Haider, Masoom, Agarwal, Ridhi, Emberton, Mark, Pond, Gregory R., Takwoingi, Yemisi, Klotz, Laurence, Moore, Caroline M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35113918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263345
_version_ 1784644771190407168
author Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
Chan, Vinson Wai-Shun
Clement, Keiran D.
Levis, Brooke
Haider, Masoom
Agarwal, Ridhi
Emberton, Mark
Pond, Gregory R.
Takwoingi, Yemisi
Klotz, Laurence
Moore, Caroline M.
author_facet Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
Chan, Vinson Wai-Shun
Clement, Keiran D.
Levis, Brooke
Haider, Masoom
Agarwal, Ridhi
Emberton, Mark
Pond, Gregory R.
Takwoingi, Yemisi
Klotz, Laurence
Moore, Caroline M.
author_sort Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy for prostate cancer is prone to random and systemic error and has been shown to have a negative predictive value of 70%. PRECISION and PRECISE are among the first randomised studies to evaluate the new MRI-targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) pathway with a non-paired design to detect clinically significant prostate cancer and avoid unnecessary treatment. The trials’ results individually demonstrated non-inferiority of MRI-TB compared to TRUS biopsy. An individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis was planned from the outset of the two trials in parallel and this IPD meta-analysis aims to further elucidate the utility of MRI-TB as the optimal diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021249263). A search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Registered Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed up until 4(th) February 2021. Only randomised controlled trials (PRECISE, PRECISION and other eligible trials) comparing the MRI-targeted biopsy pathway and traditional TRUS biopsy pathway will be included. The primary outcome of the review is the proportion of men diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer in each arm (Gleason ≥ 3+4 = 7). IPD and study-level data and characteristics will be sought from eligible studies. Analyses will be done primarily using an intention-to-treat approach, and a one-step IPD meta-analysis will be performed using generalised linear mixed models. A non-inferiority margin of 5 percentage points will be used. Heterogeneity will be quantified using the variance parameters from the mixed model. If there is sufficient data, we will investigate heterogeneity by exploring the effect of the different conducts of MRIs, learning curves of MRI reporting and MRI targeted biopsies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This systematic review is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021249263)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8812968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88129682022-02-04 A protocol for the VISION study: An indiVidual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing MRI-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultraSound guided bIopsy in the detection of prOstate cancer Kasivisvanathan, Veeru Chan, Vinson Wai-Shun Clement, Keiran D. Levis, Brooke Haider, Masoom Agarwal, Ridhi Emberton, Mark Pond, Gregory R. Takwoingi, Yemisi Klotz, Laurence Moore, Caroline M. PLoS One Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy for prostate cancer is prone to random and systemic error and has been shown to have a negative predictive value of 70%. PRECISION and PRECISE are among the first randomised studies to evaluate the new MRI-targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) pathway with a non-paired design to detect clinically significant prostate cancer and avoid unnecessary treatment. The trials’ results individually demonstrated non-inferiority of MRI-TB compared to TRUS biopsy. An individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis was planned from the outset of the two trials in parallel and this IPD meta-analysis aims to further elucidate the utility of MRI-TB as the optimal diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021249263). A search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Registered Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed up until 4(th) February 2021. Only randomised controlled trials (PRECISE, PRECISION and other eligible trials) comparing the MRI-targeted biopsy pathway and traditional TRUS biopsy pathway will be included. The primary outcome of the review is the proportion of men diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer in each arm (Gleason ≥ 3+4 = 7). IPD and study-level data and characteristics will be sought from eligible studies. Analyses will be done primarily using an intention-to-treat approach, and a one-step IPD meta-analysis will be performed using generalised linear mixed models. A non-inferiority margin of 5 percentage points will be used. Heterogeneity will be quantified using the variance parameters from the mixed model. If there is sufficient data, we will investigate heterogeneity by exploring the effect of the different conducts of MRIs, learning curves of MRI reporting and MRI targeted biopsies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This systematic review is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021249263) Public Library of Science 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8812968/ /pubmed/35113918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263345 Text en © 2022 Kasivisvanathan et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
Chan, Vinson Wai-Shun
Clement, Keiran D.
Levis, Brooke
Haider, Masoom
Agarwal, Ridhi
Emberton, Mark
Pond, Gregory R.
Takwoingi, Yemisi
Klotz, Laurence
Moore, Caroline M.
A protocol for the VISION study: An indiVidual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing MRI-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultraSound guided bIopsy in the detection of prOstate cancer
title A protocol for the VISION study: An indiVidual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing MRI-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultraSound guided bIopsy in the detection of prOstate cancer
title_full A protocol for the VISION study: An indiVidual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing MRI-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultraSound guided bIopsy in the detection of prOstate cancer
title_fullStr A protocol for the VISION study: An indiVidual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing MRI-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultraSound guided bIopsy in the detection of prOstate cancer
title_full_unstemmed A protocol for the VISION study: An indiVidual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing MRI-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultraSound guided bIopsy in the detection of prOstate cancer
title_short A protocol for the VISION study: An indiVidual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing MRI-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultraSound guided bIopsy in the detection of prOstate cancer
title_sort protocol for the vision study: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing mri-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35113918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263345
work_keys_str_mv AT kasivisvanathanveeru aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT chanvinsonwaishun aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT clementkeirand aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT levisbrooke aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT haidermasoom aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT agarwalridhi aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT embertonmark aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT pondgregoryr aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT takwoingiyemisi aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT klotzlaurence aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT moorecarolinem aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT aprotocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT kasivisvanathanveeru protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT chanvinsonwaishun protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT clementkeirand protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT levisbrooke protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT haidermasoom protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT agarwalridhi protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT embertonmark protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT pondgregoryr protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT takwoingiyemisi protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT klotzlaurence protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT moorecarolinem protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer
AT protocolforthevisionstudyanindividualpatientdatametaanalysisofrandomisedtrialscomparingmritargetedbiopsytostandardtransrectalultrasoundguidedbiopsyinthedetectionofprostatecancer