Humidified and standard oxygen therapy in acute severe asthma in children (HUMOX): A pilot randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Oxygen (O(2)) is a mainstay of treatment in acute severe asthma but how it is administered varies widely. The objectives were to examine whether a trial comparing humidified O(2) to standard O(2) in children is feasible, and specifically to obtain data on recruitment, tolerability and outcome measure stability. METHODS: Heated humidified, cold humidified and standard O(2) treatments were compared for children (2–16 years) with acute severe asthma in a multi-centre, open, parallel, pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT). Multiple outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Of 258 children screened, 66 were randomised (heated humidified O(2) n = 25; cold humidified O(2) n = 21; standard O(2) n = 20). Median (IQR) length of stay (hours) in hospital was 37.9 (29.1), 52 (35.4) and 49.1 (29.7) for standard, heated humidified and cold humidified respectively and time (hours) on O(2) was 15.9 (9.4), 13.6 (14.9) and 13.1 (14.9) for the three groups respectively. The mean (standard deviation) time (hours) taken to step down nebulised to inhaled treatment was 5.6 (14.3), 35.1 (28.2) and 32.7 (20.1). Asthma Severity Score decreased in all three groups similarly, although missing data prevented complete analysis. Humidified O(2) was least well tolerated with eight participants discontinuing their randomised treatment early. An important barrier to recruitment was research nurse availability. CONCLUSION: Although, the results of this pilot study should not be extrapolated beyond the study sample and inferential conclusions should not be drawn from the results, this is the first RCT to compare humidified and standard O(2) therapy in acute severe asthmatics of any age. These findings and accompanying screening data show that a large RCT of O(2) therapy is feasible. However, challenges associated with randomisation and data collection should be addressed in any future trial design.